Cargando…

Sex differences in the association between marital status and the risk of cardiovascular, cancer, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 7,881,040 individuals

PURPOSE: To ascertain whether sex differences exist in the relationship between marital status and cardiovascular diseases (CVD), coronary heart disease (CHD), cancer and all-cause mortality in the general population and to explore the potential effect of age, location, the duration of follow-up and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yafeng, Jiao, Yurui, Nie, Jing, O’Neil, Adrienne, Huang, Wentao, Zhang, Lei, Han, Jiafei, Liu, Hao, Zhu, Yikun, Yu, Chuanhua, Woodward, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7047380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32161813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41256-020-00133-8
_version_ 1783502128457711616
author Wang, Yafeng
Jiao, Yurui
Nie, Jing
O’Neil, Adrienne
Huang, Wentao
Zhang, Lei
Han, Jiafei
Liu, Hao
Zhu, Yikun
Yu, Chuanhua
Woodward, Mark
author_facet Wang, Yafeng
Jiao, Yurui
Nie, Jing
O’Neil, Adrienne
Huang, Wentao
Zhang, Lei
Han, Jiafei
Liu, Hao
Zhu, Yikun
Yu, Chuanhua
Woodward, Mark
author_sort Wang, Yafeng
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To ascertain whether sex differences exist in the relationship between marital status and cardiovascular diseases (CVD), coronary heart disease (CHD), cancer and all-cause mortality in the general population and to explore the potential effect of age, location, the duration of follow-up and publication years on these outcomes. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE from inception through to April 2018 and review of references to obtain sex-specific relative risks and their 95% confidence intervals. These were used to derive the women-to-men ratio of RRs (RRR) and 95% CI for each study. RRs and RRRs for each outcome were then pooled using random effects inverse-variance weighted meta-analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies with 7,891,623 individuals and 1,888,752 deaths were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with married individuals, being unmarried was significantly associated with all-cause, cancer, CVD and coronary heart disease mortalities for both sexes. However, the association with CVD and all-cause mortality was stronger in men. Being divorced/separated was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality in men and a stronger risk of cancer and CVD mortality. The pooled ratio for women versus men showed 31 and 9% greater risk of stroke mortality and all-cause mortality associated with never married in men than in women. CONCLUSIONS: Being unmarried conferred higher risk of stroke and all-cause mortality for men than women. Moreover, divorced/separated men had higher risk of cancer mortality and CVD mortality. Further studies are warranted to clarify the biological, behavioral, and/or social mechanisms involved in sex differences by these associations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7047380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70473802020-03-11 Sex differences in the association between marital status and the risk of cardiovascular, cancer, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 7,881,040 individuals Wang, Yafeng Jiao, Yurui Nie, Jing O’Neil, Adrienne Huang, Wentao Zhang, Lei Han, Jiafei Liu, Hao Zhu, Yikun Yu, Chuanhua Woodward, Mark Glob Health Res Policy Review PURPOSE: To ascertain whether sex differences exist in the relationship between marital status and cardiovascular diseases (CVD), coronary heart disease (CHD), cancer and all-cause mortality in the general population and to explore the potential effect of age, location, the duration of follow-up and publication years on these outcomes. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE from inception through to April 2018 and review of references to obtain sex-specific relative risks and their 95% confidence intervals. These were used to derive the women-to-men ratio of RRs (RRR) and 95% CI for each study. RRs and RRRs for each outcome were then pooled using random effects inverse-variance weighted meta-analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies with 7,891,623 individuals and 1,888,752 deaths were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with married individuals, being unmarried was significantly associated with all-cause, cancer, CVD and coronary heart disease mortalities for both sexes. However, the association with CVD and all-cause mortality was stronger in men. Being divorced/separated was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality in men and a stronger risk of cancer and CVD mortality. The pooled ratio for women versus men showed 31 and 9% greater risk of stroke mortality and all-cause mortality associated with never married in men than in women. CONCLUSIONS: Being unmarried conferred higher risk of stroke and all-cause mortality for men than women. Moreover, divorced/separated men had higher risk of cancer mortality and CVD mortality. Further studies are warranted to clarify the biological, behavioral, and/or social mechanisms involved in sex differences by these associations. BioMed Central 2020-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7047380/ /pubmed/32161813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41256-020-00133-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Wang, Yafeng
Jiao, Yurui
Nie, Jing
O’Neil, Adrienne
Huang, Wentao
Zhang, Lei
Han, Jiafei
Liu, Hao
Zhu, Yikun
Yu, Chuanhua
Woodward, Mark
Sex differences in the association between marital status and the risk of cardiovascular, cancer, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 7,881,040 individuals
title Sex differences in the association between marital status and the risk of cardiovascular, cancer, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 7,881,040 individuals
title_full Sex differences in the association between marital status and the risk of cardiovascular, cancer, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 7,881,040 individuals
title_fullStr Sex differences in the association between marital status and the risk of cardiovascular, cancer, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 7,881,040 individuals
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in the association between marital status and the risk of cardiovascular, cancer, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 7,881,040 individuals
title_short Sex differences in the association between marital status and the risk of cardiovascular, cancer, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 7,881,040 individuals
title_sort sex differences in the association between marital status and the risk of cardiovascular, cancer, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 7,881,040 individuals
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7047380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32161813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41256-020-00133-8
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyafeng sexdifferencesintheassociationbetweenmaritalstatusandtheriskofcardiovascularcancerandallcausemortalityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof7881040individuals
AT jiaoyurui sexdifferencesintheassociationbetweenmaritalstatusandtheriskofcardiovascularcancerandallcausemortalityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof7881040individuals
AT niejing sexdifferencesintheassociationbetweenmaritalstatusandtheriskofcardiovascularcancerandallcausemortalityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof7881040individuals
AT oneiladrienne sexdifferencesintheassociationbetweenmaritalstatusandtheriskofcardiovascularcancerandallcausemortalityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof7881040individuals
AT huangwentao sexdifferencesintheassociationbetweenmaritalstatusandtheriskofcardiovascularcancerandallcausemortalityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof7881040individuals
AT zhanglei sexdifferencesintheassociationbetweenmaritalstatusandtheriskofcardiovascularcancerandallcausemortalityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof7881040individuals
AT hanjiafei sexdifferencesintheassociationbetweenmaritalstatusandtheriskofcardiovascularcancerandallcausemortalityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof7881040individuals
AT liuhao sexdifferencesintheassociationbetweenmaritalstatusandtheriskofcardiovascularcancerandallcausemortalityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof7881040individuals
AT zhuyikun sexdifferencesintheassociationbetweenmaritalstatusandtheriskofcardiovascularcancerandallcausemortalityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof7881040individuals
AT yuchuanhua sexdifferencesintheassociationbetweenmaritalstatusandtheriskofcardiovascularcancerandallcausemortalityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof7881040individuals
AT woodwardmark sexdifferencesintheassociationbetweenmaritalstatusandtheriskofcardiovascularcancerandallcausemortalityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisof7881040individuals