Cargando…

Slow-pull capillary technique versus suction technique in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for diagnosing diseases involving hilar and mediastinal lymph node enlargement

BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a widely used, safe, and accurate technique for obtaining pathological specimens to be used in the diagnosis of diseases involving lung hilar and mediastinal lymph node (LN) enlargement. However, application...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Xin, Wu, Yanjun, Wang, Haoyan, Yu, Ganggang, Xu, Bo, Jia, Nan, Yao, Zhigang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7047425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32103709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753466620907037
_version_ 1783502139175206912
author He, Xin
Wu, Yanjun
Wang, Haoyan
Yu, Ganggang
Xu, Bo
Jia, Nan
Yao, Zhigang
author_facet He, Xin
Wu, Yanjun
Wang, Haoyan
Yu, Ganggang
Xu, Bo
Jia, Nan
Yao, Zhigang
author_sort He, Xin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a widely used, safe, and accurate technique for obtaining pathological specimens to be used in the diagnosis of diseases involving lung hilar and mediastinal lymph node (LN) enlargement. However, application of the suction technique during EBUS-TBNA remains controversial. In addition, the effectiveness of the slow-pull capillary technique for the diagnosis of pancreatic masses was recently reported. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA using these two techniques. METHODS: The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and availability of tissue cores of the suction and slow-pull capillary techniques were studied retrospectively in patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of diseases involving lung hilar and mediastinal LN enlargement. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients with hilar and mediastinal LN enlargement underwent EBUS-TBNA; 30 patients underwent the suction technique, 56 patients underwent the slow-pull capillary technique, 5 patients underwent both techniques, and 6 patients had failed operations. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and the number of tissue cores obtained with the suction and slow-pull capillary techniques were 66.67% versus 85.71% (p = 0.039), 43.75% versus 85.42% (p < 0.001), 92.86% versus 87.5% (p > 0.05), 59.09% versus 50% (p > 0.05), 87.5% versus 97.62% (p > 0.05), and 19 versus 50 (p = 0.004), respectively. In both univariate and multivariate analyses, the acquisition of tissue core was significantly associated with the diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA. Moreover, the slow-pull capillary technique was significantly associated with the acquisition of tissue core in EBUS-TBNA. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the blood contamination of samples. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the slow-pull capillary technique in EBUS-TBNA can significantly increase the accuracy related to the diagnosis of diseases involving hilar and mediastinal LN enlargement by improving the acquisition of tissue core. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7047425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70474252020-03-10 Slow-pull capillary technique versus suction technique in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for diagnosing diseases involving hilar and mediastinal lymph node enlargement He, Xin Wu, Yanjun Wang, Haoyan Yu, Ganggang Xu, Bo Jia, Nan Yao, Zhigang Ther Adv Respir Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a widely used, safe, and accurate technique for obtaining pathological specimens to be used in the diagnosis of diseases involving lung hilar and mediastinal lymph node (LN) enlargement. However, application of the suction technique during EBUS-TBNA remains controversial. In addition, the effectiveness of the slow-pull capillary technique for the diagnosis of pancreatic masses was recently reported. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA using these two techniques. METHODS: The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and availability of tissue cores of the suction and slow-pull capillary techniques were studied retrospectively in patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of diseases involving lung hilar and mediastinal LN enlargement. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients with hilar and mediastinal LN enlargement underwent EBUS-TBNA; 30 patients underwent the suction technique, 56 patients underwent the slow-pull capillary technique, 5 patients underwent both techniques, and 6 patients had failed operations. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and the number of tissue cores obtained with the suction and slow-pull capillary techniques were 66.67% versus 85.71% (p = 0.039), 43.75% versus 85.42% (p < 0.001), 92.86% versus 87.5% (p > 0.05), 59.09% versus 50% (p > 0.05), 87.5% versus 97.62% (p > 0.05), and 19 versus 50 (p = 0.004), respectively. In both univariate and multivariate analyses, the acquisition of tissue core was significantly associated with the diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA. Moreover, the slow-pull capillary technique was significantly associated with the acquisition of tissue core in EBUS-TBNA. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the blood contamination of samples. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the slow-pull capillary technique in EBUS-TBNA can significantly increase the accuracy related to the diagnosis of diseases involving hilar and mediastinal LN enlargement by improving the acquisition of tissue core. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section. SAGE Publications 2020-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7047425/ /pubmed/32103709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753466620907037 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
He, Xin
Wu, Yanjun
Wang, Haoyan
Yu, Ganggang
Xu, Bo
Jia, Nan
Yao, Zhigang
Slow-pull capillary technique versus suction technique in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for diagnosing diseases involving hilar and mediastinal lymph node enlargement
title Slow-pull capillary technique versus suction technique in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for diagnosing diseases involving hilar and mediastinal lymph node enlargement
title_full Slow-pull capillary technique versus suction technique in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for diagnosing diseases involving hilar and mediastinal lymph node enlargement
title_fullStr Slow-pull capillary technique versus suction technique in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for diagnosing diseases involving hilar and mediastinal lymph node enlargement
title_full_unstemmed Slow-pull capillary technique versus suction technique in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for diagnosing diseases involving hilar and mediastinal lymph node enlargement
title_short Slow-pull capillary technique versus suction technique in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for diagnosing diseases involving hilar and mediastinal lymph node enlargement
title_sort slow-pull capillary technique versus suction technique in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for diagnosing diseases involving hilar and mediastinal lymph node enlargement
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7047425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32103709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753466620907037
work_keys_str_mv AT hexin slowpullcapillarytechniqueversussuctiontechniqueinendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationfordiagnosingdiseasesinvolvinghilarandmediastinallymphnodeenlargement
AT wuyanjun slowpullcapillarytechniqueversussuctiontechniqueinendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationfordiagnosingdiseasesinvolvinghilarandmediastinallymphnodeenlargement
AT wanghaoyan slowpullcapillarytechniqueversussuctiontechniqueinendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationfordiagnosingdiseasesinvolvinghilarandmediastinallymphnodeenlargement
AT yuganggang slowpullcapillarytechniqueversussuctiontechniqueinendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationfordiagnosingdiseasesinvolvinghilarandmediastinallymphnodeenlargement
AT xubo slowpullcapillarytechniqueversussuctiontechniqueinendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationfordiagnosingdiseasesinvolvinghilarandmediastinallymphnodeenlargement
AT jianan slowpullcapillarytechniqueversussuctiontechniqueinendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationfordiagnosingdiseasesinvolvinghilarandmediastinallymphnodeenlargement
AT yaozhigang slowpullcapillarytechniqueversussuctiontechniqueinendobronchialultrasoundguidedtransbronchialneedleaspirationfordiagnosingdiseasesinvolvinghilarandmediastinallymphnodeenlargement