Cargando…

Feasibility and acceptability of introducing advance care planning on a thoracic medicine inpatient ward: an exploratory mixed method study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Advance care planning (ACP) is communication about wishes and preferences for end-of-life care. ACP is not routinely used in any Norwegian hospitals. We performed a pilot study (2014–2017) introducing ACP on a thoracic medicine ward in Norway. The aims of this study were to expl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hjorth, Nina Elisabeth, Schaufel, Margrethe Aase, Sigurdardottir, Katrin Ruth, Haugen, Dagny R Faksvåg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7047484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32107203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000485
_version_ 1783502151039844352
author Hjorth, Nina Elisabeth
Schaufel, Margrethe Aase
Sigurdardottir, Katrin Ruth
Haugen, Dagny R Faksvåg
author_facet Hjorth, Nina Elisabeth
Schaufel, Margrethe Aase
Sigurdardottir, Katrin Ruth
Haugen, Dagny R Faksvåg
author_sort Hjorth, Nina Elisabeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Advance care planning (ACP) is communication about wishes and preferences for end-of-life care. ACP is not routinely used in any Norwegian hospitals. We performed a pilot study (2014–2017) introducing ACP on a thoracic medicine ward in Norway. The aims of this study were to explore which topics patients discussed during ACP conversations and to assess how patients, relatives and clinicians experienced the acceptability and feasibility of performing ACP. METHODS: Conversations were led by a study nurse or physician using a semistructured guide, encouraging patients to talk freely. Each conversation was summarised in a report in the patient’s medical record. At the end of the pilot period, clinicians discussed their experiences in focus group interviews. Reports and transcribed interviews were analysed using systematic text condensation. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients participated in ACP conversations (41–86 years; 9 COPD, 41 lung cancer, 1 lung fibrosis; 11 women); 18 were accompanied by a relative. Four themes emerged: (1) disturbing symptoms, (2) existential topics, (3) care planning and (4) important relationships. All participants appreciated the conversations. Clinicians (1 physician and 7 nurses) participated in two focus group interviews. Reports from ACP conversations revealed patient values previously unknown to clinicians; important information was passed on to primary care. Fearing they would deprive patients of hope, clinicians acted as gatekeepers for recruitment. Although they reported barriers during recruitment, many clinicians saw ACP as pertinent and called for time and skills to integrate it into their daily clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Patients, relatives and clinicians showed a positive attitude towards ACP. Focusing on present and future symptom control may be an acceptable way to introduce ACP. Important aspects for implementing ACP in this patient group are management support, education, training, feasible routines and allocated time to perform the conversations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7047484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70474842020-03-09 Feasibility and acceptability of introducing advance care planning on a thoracic medicine inpatient ward: an exploratory mixed method study Hjorth, Nina Elisabeth Schaufel, Margrethe Aase Sigurdardottir, Katrin Ruth Haugen, Dagny R Faksvåg BMJ Open Respir Res Lung Cancer BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Advance care planning (ACP) is communication about wishes and preferences for end-of-life care. ACP is not routinely used in any Norwegian hospitals. We performed a pilot study (2014–2017) introducing ACP on a thoracic medicine ward in Norway. The aims of this study were to explore which topics patients discussed during ACP conversations and to assess how patients, relatives and clinicians experienced the acceptability and feasibility of performing ACP. METHODS: Conversations were led by a study nurse or physician using a semistructured guide, encouraging patients to talk freely. Each conversation was summarised in a report in the patient’s medical record. At the end of the pilot period, clinicians discussed their experiences in focus group interviews. Reports and transcribed interviews were analysed using systematic text condensation. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients participated in ACP conversations (41–86 years; 9 COPD, 41 lung cancer, 1 lung fibrosis; 11 women); 18 were accompanied by a relative. Four themes emerged: (1) disturbing symptoms, (2) existential topics, (3) care planning and (4) important relationships. All participants appreciated the conversations. Clinicians (1 physician and 7 nurses) participated in two focus group interviews. Reports from ACP conversations revealed patient values previously unknown to clinicians; important information was passed on to primary care. Fearing they would deprive patients of hope, clinicians acted as gatekeepers for recruitment. Although they reported barriers during recruitment, many clinicians saw ACP as pertinent and called for time and skills to integrate it into their daily clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Patients, relatives and clinicians showed a positive attitude towards ACP. Focusing on present and future symptom control may be an acceptable way to introduce ACP. Important aspects for implementing ACP in this patient group are management support, education, training, feasible routines and allocated time to perform the conversations. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7047484/ /pubmed/32107203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000485 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Lung Cancer
Hjorth, Nina Elisabeth
Schaufel, Margrethe Aase
Sigurdardottir, Katrin Ruth
Haugen, Dagny R Faksvåg
Feasibility and acceptability of introducing advance care planning on a thoracic medicine inpatient ward: an exploratory mixed method study
title Feasibility and acceptability of introducing advance care planning on a thoracic medicine inpatient ward: an exploratory mixed method study
title_full Feasibility and acceptability of introducing advance care planning on a thoracic medicine inpatient ward: an exploratory mixed method study
title_fullStr Feasibility and acceptability of introducing advance care planning on a thoracic medicine inpatient ward: an exploratory mixed method study
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and acceptability of introducing advance care planning on a thoracic medicine inpatient ward: an exploratory mixed method study
title_short Feasibility and acceptability of introducing advance care planning on a thoracic medicine inpatient ward: an exploratory mixed method study
title_sort feasibility and acceptability of introducing advance care planning on a thoracic medicine inpatient ward: an exploratory mixed method study
topic Lung Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7047484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32107203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000485
work_keys_str_mv AT hjorthninaelisabeth feasibilityandacceptabilityofintroducingadvancecareplanningonathoracicmedicineinpatientwardanexploratorymixedmethodstudy
AT schaufelmargretheaase feasibilityandacceptabilityofintroducingadvancecareplanningonathoracicmedicineinpatientwardanexploratorymixedmethodstudy
AT sigurdardottirkatrinruth feasibilityandacceptabilityofintroducingadvancecareplanningonathoracicmedicineinpatientwardanexploratorymixedmethodstudy
AT haugendagnyrfaksvag feasibilityandacceptabilityofintroducingadvancecareplanningonathoracicmedicineinpatientwardanexploratorymixedmethodstudy