Cargando…

What do we really assess with organisational culture tools in healthcare? An interpretive systematic umbrella review of tools in healthcare

INTRODUCTION: A toxic organisational culture (OC) is a major contributing factor to serious failings in healthcare delivery. Poor OC with its consequences of unprofessional behaviour, unsafe attitudes of professionals and its impact on patient care still need to be addressed. Although various tools...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malik, Romana Fattimah, Buljac-Samardžić, Martina, Akdemir, Nesibe, Hilders, Carina, Scheele, Fedde
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7047493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32075804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000826
_version_ 1783502153205153792
author Malik, Romana Fattimah
Buljac-Samardžić, Martina
Akdemir, Nesibe
Hilders, Carina
Scheele, Fedde
author_facet Malik, Romana Fattimah
Buljac-Samardžić, Martina
Akdemir, Nesibe
Hilders, Carina
Scheele, Fedde
author_sort Malik, Romana Fattimah
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A toxic organisational culture (OC) is a major contributing factor to serious failings in healthcare delivery. Poor OC with its consequences of unprofessional behaviour, unsafe attitudes of professionals and its impact on patient care still need to be addressed. Although various tools have been developed to determine OC and improve patient safety, it remains a challenge to decide on the suitability of tools for uncovering the underlying factors which truly impact OC, such as behavioural norms, or the unwritten rules. A better understanding of the underlying dimensions that these tools do and do not unravel is required. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to provide an overview of existing tools to assess OC and the tangible and intangible OC dimensions these tools address. METHODS: An interpretive umbrella review was conducted. Literature reviews were considered for inclusion if they described multiple tools and their dimensional characteristics in the context of OC, organisational climate, patient safety culture or climate. OC tools and the underlying dimensions were extracted from the reviews. A qualitative data analysis software program (MAX.QDA 2007) was used for coding the dimensions, which resulted in tangible and intangible themes. RESULTS: Fifteen reviews met our inclusion criteria. A total of 127 tools were identified, which were mainly quantitative questionnaires covering tangible key dimensions. Qualitative analyses distinguished nine intangible themes (commitment, trust, psychological safety, power, support, communication openness, blame and shame, morals and valuing ethics, and cohesion) and seven tangible themes (leadership, communication system, teamwork, training and development, organisational structures and processes, employee and job attributes, and patient orientation). CONCLUSION: This umbrella review identifies the essential tangible and intangible themes of OC tools. OC tools in healthcare do not seem to be designed to determine deeper underlying dimensions of culture. We suggest approaching complex underlying OC problems by focusing on the intangible dimensions, rather than putting the tangible dimensions up front.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7047493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70474932020-03-09 What do we really assess with organisational culture tools in healthcare? An interpretive systematic umbrella review of tools in healthcare Malik, Romana Fattimah Buljac-Samardžić, Martina Akdemir, Nesibe Hilders, Carina Scheele, Fedde BMJ Open Qual Systematic Review INTRODUCTION: A toxic organisational culture (OC) is a major contributing factor to serious failings in healthcare delivery. Poor OC with its consequences of unprofessional behaviour, unsafe attitudes of professionals and its impact on patient care still need to be addressed. Although various tools have been developed to determine OC and improve patient safety, it remains a challenge to decide on the suitability of tools for uncovering the underlying factors which truly impact OC, such as behavioural norms, or the unwritten rules. A better understanding of the underlying dimensions that these tools do and do not unravel is required. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to provide an overview of existing tools to assess OC and the tangible and intangible OC dimensions these tools address. METHODS: An interpretive umbrella review was conducted. Literature reviews were considered for inclusion if they described multiple tools and their dimensional characteristics in the context of OC, organisational climate, patient safety culture or climate. OC tools and the underlying dimensions were extracted from the reviews. A qualitative data analysis software program (MAX.QDA 2007) was used for coding the dimensions, which resulted in tangible and intangible themes. RESULTS: Fifteen reviews met our inclusion criteria. A total of 127 tools were identified, which were mainly quantitative questionnaires covering tangible key dimensions. Qualitative analyses distinguished nine intangible themes (commitment, trust, psychological safety, power, support, communication openness, blame and shame, morals and valuing ethics, and cohesion) and seven tangible themes (leadership, communication system, teamwork, training and development, organisational structures and processes, employee and job attributes, and patient orientation). CONCLUSION: This umbrella review identifies the essential tangible and intangible themes of OC tools. OC tools in healthcare do not seem to be designed to determine deeper underlying dimensions of culture. We suggest approaching complex underlying OC problems by focusing on the intangible dimensions, rather than putting the tangible dimensions up front. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7047493/ /pubmed/32075804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000826 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Malik, Romana Fattimah
Buljac-Samardžić, Martina
Akdemir, Nesibe
Hilders, Carina
Scheele, Fedde
What do we really assess with organisational culture tools in healthcare? An interpretive systematic umbrella review of tools in healthcare
title What do we really assess with organisational culture tools in healthcare? An interpretive systematic umbrella review of tools in healthcare
title_full What do we really assess with organisational culture tools in healthcare? An interpretive systematic umbrella review of tools in healthcare
title_fullStr What do we really assess with organisational culture tools in healthcare? An interpretive systematic umbrella review of tools in healthcare
title_full_unstemmed What do we really assess with organisational culture tools in healthcare? An interpretive systematic umbrella review of tools in healthcare
title_short What do we really assess with organisational culture tools in healthcare? An interpretive systematic umbrella review of tools in healthcare
title_sort what do we really assess with organisational culture tools in healthcare? an interpretive systematic umbrella review of tools in healthcare
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7047493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32075804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000826
work_keys_str_mv AT malikromanafattimah whatdowereallyassesswithorganisationalculturetoolsinhealthcareaninterpretivesystematicumbrellareviewoftoolsinhealthcare
AT buljacsamardzicmartina whatdowereallyassesswithorganisationalculturetoolsinhealthcareaninterpretivesystematicumbrellareviewoftoolsinhealthcare
AT akdemirnesibe whatdowereallyassesswithorganisationalculturetoolsinhealthcareaninterpretivesystematicumbrellareviewoftoolsinhealthcare
AT hilderscarina whatdowereallyassesswithorganisationalculturetoolsinhealthcareaninterpretivesystematicumbrellareviewoftoolsinhealthcare
AT scheelefedde whatdowereallyassesswithorganisationalculturetoolsinhealthcareaninterpretivesystematicumbrellareviewoftoolsinhealthcare