Cargando…
Doing our work better, together: a relationship-based approach to defining the quality improvement agenda in trauma care
BACKGROUND: Trauma care represents a complex patient journey, requiring multidisciplinary coordinated care. Team members are human, and as such, how they feel about their colleagues and their work affects performance. The challenge for health service leaders is enabling culture that supports high le...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7047507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32046977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000749 |
_version_ | 1783502155780456448 |
---|---|
author | Purdy, Eve Isabelle McLean, Darren Alexander, Charlotte Scott, Matthew Donohue, Andrew Campbell, Don Wullschleger, Martin Berkowitz, Gary Winearls, James Henry, Doug Brazil, Victoria |
author_facet | Purdy, Eve Isabelle McLean, Darren Alexander, Charlotte Scott, Matthew Donohue, Andrew Campbell, Don Wullschleger, Martin Berkowitz, Gary Winearls, James Henry, Doug Brazil, Victoria |
author_sort | Purdy, Eve Isabelle |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Trauma care represents a complex patient journey, requiring multidisciplinary coordinated care. Team members are human, and as such, how they feel about their colleagues and their work affects performance. The challenge for health service leaders is enabling culture that supports high levels of collaboration, co-operation and coordination across diverse groups. We aimed to define and improve relational aspects of trauma care at Gold Coast University Hospital. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods collaborative ethnography using the relational coordination survey—an established tool to analyse the relational dimensions of multidisciplinary teamwork—participant observation, interviews and narrative surveys. Findings were presented to clinicians in working groups for further interpretation and to facilitate co-creation of targeted interventions designed to improve team relationships and performance. FINDINGS: We engaged a complex multidisciplinary network of ~500 care providers dispersed across seven core interdependent clinical disciplines. Initial findings highlighted the importance of relationships in trauma care and opportunities to improve. Narrative survey and ethnographic findings further highlighted the centrality of a translational simulation programme in contributing positively to team culture and relational ties. A range of 16 interventions—focusing on structural, process and relational dimensions—were co-created with participants and are now being implemented and evaluated by various trauma care providers. CONCLUSIONS: Through engagement of clinicians spanning organisational boundaries, relational aspects of care can be measured and directly targeted in a collaborative quality improvement process. We encourage healthcare leaders to consider relationship-based quality improvement strategies, including translational simulation and relational coordination processes, in their efforts to improve care for patients with complex, interdependent journeys. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7047507 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70475072020-03-09 Doing our work better, together: a relationship-based approach to defining the quality improvement agenda in trauma care Purdy, Eve Isabelle McLean, Darren Alexander, Charlotte Scott, Matthew Donohue, Andrew Campbell, Don Wullschleger, Martin Berkowitz, Gary Winearls, James Henry, Doug Brazil, Victoria BMJ Open Qual Original Research BACKGROUND: Trauma care represents a complex patient journey, requiring multidisciplinary coordinated care. Team members are human, and as such, how they feel about their colleagues and their work affects performance. The challenge for health service leaders is enabling culture that supports high levels of collaboration, co-operation and coordination across diverse groups. We aimed to define and improve relational aspects of trauma care at Gold Coast University Hospital. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods collaborative ethnography using the relational coordination survey—an established tool to analyse the relational dimensions of multidisciplinary teamwork—participant observation, interviews and narrative surveys. Findings were presented to clinicians in working groups for further interpretation and to facilitate co-creation of targeted interventions designed to improve team relationships and performance. FINDINGS: We engaged a complex multidisciplinary network of ~500 care providers dispersed across seven core interdependent clinical disciplines. Initial findings highlighted the importance of relationships in trauma care and opportunities to improve. Narrative survey and ethnographic findings further highlighted the centrality of a translational simulation programme in contributing positively to team culture and relational ties. A range of 16 interventions—focusing on structural, process and relational dimensions—were co-created with participants and are now being implemented and evaluated by various trauma care providers. CONCLUSIONS: Through engagement of clinicians spanning organisational boundaries, relational aspects of care can be measured and directly targeted in a collaborative quality improvement process. We encourage healthcare leaders to consider relationship-based quality improvement strategies, including translational simulation and relational coordination processes, in their efforts to improve care for patients with complex, interdependent journeys. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7047507/ /pubmed/32046977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000749 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Purdy, Eve Isabelle McLean, Darren Alexander, Charlotte Scott, Matthew Donohue, Andrew Campbell, Don Wullschleger, Martin Berkowitz, Gary Winearls, James Henry, Doug Brazil, Victoria Doing our work better, together: a relationship-based approach to defining the quality improvement agenda in trauma care |
title | Doing our work better, together: a relationship-based approach to defining the quality improvement agenda in trauma care |
title_full | Doing our work better, together: a relationship-based approach to defining the quality improvement agenda in trauma care |
title_fullStr | Doing our work better, together: a relationship-based approach to defining the quality improvement agenda in trauma care |
title_full_unstemmed | Doing our work better, together: a relationship-based approach to defining the quality improvement agenda in trauma care |
title_short | Doing our work better, together: a relationship-based approach to defining the quality improvement agenda in trauma care |
title_sort | doing our work better, together: a relationship-based approach to defining the quality improvement agenda in trauma care |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7047507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32046977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000749 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT purdyeveisabelle doingourworkbettertogetherarelationshipbasedapproachtodefiningthequalityimprovementagendaintraumacare AT mcleandarren doingourworkbettertogetherarelationshipbasedapproachtodefiningthequalityimprovementagendaintraumacare AT alexandercharlotte doingourworkbettertogetherarelationshipbasedapproachtodefiningthequalityimprovementagendaintraumacare AT scottmatthew doingourworkbettertogetherarelationshipbasedapproachtodefiningthequalityimprovementagendaintraumacare AT donohueandrew doingourworkbettertogetherarelationshipbasedapproachtodefiningthequalityimprovementagendaintraumacare AT campbelldon doingourworkbettertogetherarelationshipbasedapproachtodefiningthequalityimprovementagendaintraumacare AT wullschlegermartin doingourworkbettertogetherarelationshipbasedapproachtodefiningthequalityimprovementagendaintraumacare AT berkowitzgary doingourworkbettertogetherarelationshipbasedapproachtodefiningthequalityimprovementagendaintraumacare AT winearlsjames doingourworkbettertogetherarelationshipbasedapproachtodefiningthequalityimprovementagendaintraumacare AT henrydoug doingourworkbettertogetherarelationshipbasedapproachtodefiningthequalityimprovementagendaintraumacare AT brazilvictoria doingourworkbettertogetherarelationshipbasedapproachtodefiningthequalityimprovementagendaintraumacare |