Cargando…
The Odyssey of Integration: Is Management its Achilles’ Heel?
INTRODUCTION: The importance of management to the implementation of integrated care is recognised in evidence and practice. Despite this recognition, there is a lack of clarity about what ‘good’ management of integrated care looks like, if the competences are different to management for ‘traditional...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ubiquity Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7047758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32140091 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5440 |
_version_ | 1783502175429722112 |
---|---|
author | Miller, Robin Stein, K. Viktoria |
author_facet | Miller, Robin Stein, K. Viktoria |
author_sort | Miller, Robin |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The importance of management to the implementation of integrated care is recognised in evidence and practice. Despite this recognition, there is a lack of clarity about what ‘good’ management of integrated care looks like, if the competences are different to management for ‘traditional’ care, and how such competences can be acquired. THEORY AND METHODS: This exploratory study is based on qualitative interviews with participants with extensive experience of implementing integrated care in senior professional, research, administrative and/or policy roles. It conceptualises management as working at ‘strategic’ and ‘operational’ levels. RESULTS: Management of integrated care was seen to require an ability to create networks across professions and organisations, to be comfortable with distributing responsibilities, and to thoroughly understand the wider system. Competences to support these new ways of working included an understanding of how to implement people-centredness, to have courage to challenge the status quo, and to demonstrate humility to learn from others. Structured development opportunities for managers were lacking, but seen as vital for the sustainability of change. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Management for integrated care remains an underdeveloped concept and practice. A first formulation of the competences necessary was achieved, but more work is urgently required to understand how to better prepare and support managers to achieve necessary changes in practice and culture. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7047758 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Ubiquity Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70477582020-03-05 The Odyssey of Integration: Is Management its Achilles’ Heel? Miller, Robin Stein, K. Viktoria Int J Integr Care Research and Theory INTRODUCTION: The importance of management to the implementation of integrated care is recognised in evidence and practice. Despite this recognition, there is a lack of clarity about what ‘good’ management of integrated care looks like, if the competences are different to management for ‘traditional’ care, and how such competences can be acquired. THEORY AND METHODS: This exploratory study is based on qualitative interviews with participants with extensive experience of implementing integrated care in senior professional, research, administrative and/or policy roles. It conceptualises management as working at ‘strategic’ and ‘operational’ levels. RESULTS: Management of integrated care was seen to require an ability to create networks across professions and organisations, to be comfortable with distributing responsibilities, and to thoroughly understand the wider system. Competences to support these new ways of working included an understanding of how to implement people-centredness, to have courage to challenge the status quo, and to demonstrate humility to learn from others. Structured development opportunities for managers were lacking, but seen as vital for the sustainability of change. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Management for integrated care remains an underdeveloped concept and practice. A first formulation of the competences necessary was achieved, but more work is urgently required to understand how to better prepare and support managers to achieve necessary changes in practice and culture. Ubiquity Press 2020-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7047758/ /pubmed/32140091 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5440 Text en Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research and Theory Miller, Robin Stein, K. Viktoria The Odyssey of Integration: Is Management its Achilles’ Heel? |
title | The Odyssey of Integration: Is Management its Achilles’ Heel? |
title_full | The Odyssey of Integration: Is Management its Achilles’ Heel? |
title_fullStr | The Odyssey of Integration: Is Management its Achilles’ Heel? |
title_full_unstemmed | The Odyssey of Integration: Is Management its Achilles’ Heel? |
title_short | The Odyssey of Integration: Is Management its Achilles’ Heel? |
title_sort | odyssey of integration: is management its achilles’ heel? |
topic | Research and Theory |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7047758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32140091 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5440 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT millerrobin theodysseyofintegrationismanagementitsachillesheel AT steinkviktoria theodysseyofintegrationismanagementitsachillesheel AT millerrobin odysseyofintegrationismanagementitsachillesheel AT steinkviktoria odysseyofintegrationismanagementitsachillesheel |