Cargando…

The Odyssey of Integration: Is Management its Achilles’ Heel?

INTRODUCTION: The importance of management to the implementation of integrated care is recognised in evidence and practice. Despite this recognition, there is a lack of clarity about what ‘good’ management of integrated care looks like, if the competences are different to management for ‘traditional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Robin, Stein, K. Viktoria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7047758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32140091
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5440
_version_ 1783502175429722112
author Miller, Robin
Stein, K. Viktoria
author_facet Miller, Robin
Stein, K. Viktoria
author_sort Miller, Robin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The importance of management to the implementation of integrated care is recognised in evidence and practice. Despite this recognition, there is a lack of clarity about what ‘good’ management of integrated care looks like, if the competences are different to management for ‘traditional’ care, and how such competences can be acquired. THEORY AND METHODS: This exploratory study is based on qualitative interviews with participants with extensive experience of implementing integrated care in senior professional, research, administrative and/or policy roles. It conceptualises management as working at ‘strategic’ and ‘operational’ levels. RESULTS: Management of integrated care was seen to require an ability to create networks across professions and organisations, to be comfortable with distributing responsibilities, and to thoroughly understand the wider system. Competences to support these new ways of working included an understanding of how to implement people-centredness, to have courage to challenge the status quo, and to demonstrate humility to learn from others. Structured development opportunities for managers were lacking, but seen as vital for the sustainability of change. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Management for integrated care remains an underdeveloped concept and practice. A first formulation of the competences necessary was achieved, but more work is urgently required to understand how to better prepare and support managers to achieve necessary changes in practice and culture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7047758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70477582020-03-05 The Odyssey of Integration: Is Management its Achilles’ Heel? Miller, Robin Stein, K. Viktoria Int J Integr Care Research and Theory INTRODUCTION: The importance of management to the implementation of integrated care is recognised in evidence and practice. Despite this recognition, there is a lack of clarity about what ‘good’ management of integrated care looks like, if the competences are different to management for ‘traditional’ care, and how such competences can be acquired. THEORY AND METHODS: This exploratory study is based on qualitative interviews with participants with extensive experience of implementing integrated care in senior professional, research, administrative and/or policy roles. It conceptualises management as working at ‘strategic’ and ‘operational’ levels. RESULTS: Management of integrated care was seen to require an ability to create networks across professions and organisations, to be comfortable with distributing responsibilities, and to thoroughly understand the wider system. Competences to support these new ways of working included an understanding of how to implement people-centredness, to have courage to challenge the status quo, and to demonstrate humility to learn from others. Structured development opportunities for managers were lacking, but seen as vital for the sustainability of change. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Management for integrated care remains an underdeveloped concept and practice. A first formulation of the competences necessary was achieved, but more work is urgently required to understand how to better prepare and support managers to achieve necessary changes in practice and culture. Ubiquity Press 2020-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7047758/ /pubmed/32140091 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5440 Text en Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research and Theory
Miller, Robin
Stein, K. Viktoria
The Odyssey of Integration: Is Management its Achilles’ Heel?
title The Odyssey of Integration: Is Management its Achilles’ Heel?
title_full The Odyssey of Integration: Is Management its Achilles’ Heel?
title_fullStr The Odyssey of Integration: Is Management its Achilles’ Heel?
title_full_unstemmed The Odyssey of Integration: Is Management its Achilles’ Heel?
title_short The Odyssey of Integration: Is Management its Achilles’ Heel?
title_sort odyssey of integration: is management its achilles’ heel?
topic Research and Theory
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7047758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32140091
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5440
work_keys_str_mv AT millerrobin theodysseyofintegrationismanagementitsachillesheel
AT steinkviktoria theodysseyofintegrationismanagementitsachillesheel
AT millerrobin odysseyofintegrationismanagementitsachillesheel
AT steinkviktoria odysseyofintegrationismanagementitsachillesheel