Cargando…

A review of informed consent and how it has evolved to protect vulnerable participants in emergency care research

A vulnerable participant in research lacks capacity to consent or may be exposed to coercion to participate. Capacity may be temporarily impaired due to loss of consciousness, hypoxia, pain and the consumption of alcohol or elicit substances. To advance emergency care, providing life-threatening mea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nandra, Rajpal, Brockie, Alan F., Hussain, Faisal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7047905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32175093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.5.180051
_version_ 1783502200795824128
author Nandra, Rajpal
Brockie, Alan F.
Hussain, Faisal
author_facet Nandra, Rajpal
Brockie, Alan F.
Hussain, Faisal
author_sort Nandra, Rajpal
collection PubMed
description A vulnerable participant in research lacks capacity to consent or may be exposed to coercion to participate. Capacity may be temporarily impaired due to loss of consciousness, hypoxia, pain and the consumption of alcohol or elicit substances. To advance emergency care, providing life-threatening measures in life-threatening circumstances, vulnerable patients are recruited into research studies. The urgent need for time-critical treatment conflicts with routine informed consent procedures. This article reviews ethical considerations and moral obligations to safeguard these participants and preserve their autonomy. A particular focus is given to research methodology to waive consent, and the role of ethics committees, research audits, research nurses and community engagement. Research on the acutely unwell patient who lacks capacity is possible with well-designed research trials that are led by investigators who are sufficiently trained, engage the community, gain ethical approval to waive consent and continuously audit practice. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:73-79. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.180051
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7047905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70479052020-03-13 A review of informed consent and how it has evolved to protect vulnerable participants in emergency care research Nandra, Rajpal Brockie, Alan F. Hussain, Faisal EFORT Open Rev Basic Science A vulnerable participant in research lacks capacity to consent or may be exposed to coercion to participate. Capacity may be temporarily impaired due to loss of consciousness, hypoxia, pain and the consumption of alcohol or elicit substances. To advance emergency care, providing life-threatening measures in life-threatening circumstances, vulnerable patients are recruited into research studies. The urgent need for time-critical treatment conflicts with routine informed consent procedures. This article reviews ethical considerations and moral obligations to safeguard these participants and preserve their autonomy. A particular focus is given to research methodology to waive consent, and the role of ethics committees, research audits, research nurses and community engagement. Research on the acutely unwell patient who lacks capacity is possible with well-designed research trials that are led by investigators who are sufficiently trained, engage the community, gain ethical approval to waive consent and continuously audit practice. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:73-79. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.180051 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2020-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7047905/ /pubmed/32175093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.5.180051 Text en © 2020 The author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed.
spellingShingle Basic Science
Nandra, Rajpal
Brockie, Alan F.
Hussain, Faisal
A review of informed consent and how it has evolved to protect vulnerable participants in emergency care research
title A review of informed consent and how it has evolved to protect vulnerable participants in emergency care research
title_full A review of informed consent and how it has evolved to protect vulnerable participants in emergency care research
title_fullStr A review of informed consent and how it has evolved to protect vulnerable participants in emergency care research
title_full_unstemmed A review of informed consent and how it has evolved to protect vulnerable participants in emergency care research
title_short A review of informed consent and how it has evolved to protect vulnerable participants in emergency care research
title_sort review of informed consent and how it has evolved to protect vulnerable participants in emergency care research
topic Basic Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7047905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32175093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.5.180051
work_keys_str_mv AT nandrarajpal areviewofinformedconsentandhowithasevolvedtoprotectvulnerableparticipantsinemergencycareresearch
AT brockiealanf areviewofinformedconsentandhowithasevolvedtoprotectvulnerableparticipantsinemergencycareresearch
AT hussainfaisal areviewofinformedconsentandhowithasevolvedtoprotectvulnerableparticipantsinemergencycareresearch
AT nandrarajpal reviewofinformedconsentandhowithasevolvedtoprotectvulnerableparticipantsinemergencycareresearch
AT brockiealanf reviewofinformedconsentandhowithasevolvedtoprotectvulnerableparticipantsinemergencycareresearch
AT hussainfaisal reviewofinformedconsentandhowithasevolvedtoprotectvulnerableparticipantsinemergencycareresearch