Cargando…

The canine oral microbiome: variation in bacterial populations across different niches

BACKGROUND: Microbiota from different niches within the canine oral cavity were profiled and compared. Supragingival plaque and stimulated saliva, were collected alongside samples from the buccal and tongue dorsum mucosa, from 14 Labrador retrievers at three timepoints within a 1 month timeframe. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruparell, Avika, Inui, Taichi, Staunton, Ruth, Wallis, Corrin, Deusch, Oliver, Holcombe, Lucy J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7048056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32111160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-1704-3
_version_ 1783502229143027712
author Ruparell, Avika
Inui, Taichi
Staunton, Ruth
Wallis, Corrin
Deusch, Oliver
Holcombe, Lucy J.
author_facet Ruparell, Avika
Inui, Taichi
Staunton, Ruth
Wallis, Corrin
Deusch, Oliver
Holcombe, Lucy J.
author_sort Ruparell, Avika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Microbiota from different niches within the canine oral cavity were profiled and compared. Supragingival plaque and stimulated saliva, were collected alongside samples from the buccal and tongue dorsum mucosa, from 14 Labrador retrievers at three timepoints within a 1 month timeframe. The V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced via Illumina MiSeq. RESULTS: Supragingival plaque microbiota had the highest bacterial diversity and the largest number of significant differences in individual taxa when compared to the other oral niches. Stimulated saliva exhibited the highest variability in microbial composition between dogs, yet the lowest bacterial diversity amongst all the niches. Overall, the bacteria of the buccal and tongue dorsum mucosa were most similar. CONCLUSIONS: The bacterial community profiles indicated three discrete oral niches: soft tissue surfaces (buccal and tongue dorsum mucosa), hard tissue surface (supragingival plaque) and saliva. The ability to distinguish the niches by their microbiota signature offers the potential for microbial biomarkers to be identified in each unique niche for diagnostic use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7048056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70480562020-03-05 The canine oral microbiome: variation in bacterial populations across different niches Ruparell, Avika Inui, Taichi Staunton, Ruth Wallis, Corrin Deusch, Oliver Holcombe, Lucy J. BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Microbiota from different niches within the canine oral cavity were profiled and compared. Supragingival plaque and stimulated saliva, were collected alongside samples from the buccal and tongue dorsum mucosa, from 14 Labrador retrievers at three timepoints within a 1 month timeframe. The V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced via Illumina MiSeq. RESULTS: Supragingival plaque microbiota had the highest bacterial diversity and the largest number of significant differences in individual taxa when compared to the other oral niches. Stimulated saliva exhibited the highest variability in microbial composition between dogs, yet the lowest bacterial diversity amongst all the niches. Overall, the bacteria of the buccal and tongue dorsum mucosa were most similar. CONCLUSIONS: The bacterial community profiles indicated three discrete oral niches: soft tissue surfaces (buccal and tongue dorsum mucosa), hard tissue surface (supragingival plaque) and saliva. The ability to distinguish the niches by their microbiota signature offers the potential for microbial biomarkers to be identified in each unique niche for diagnostic use. BioMed Central 2020-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7048056/ /pubmed/32111160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-1704-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ruparell, Avika
Inui, Taichi
Staunton, Ruth
Wallis, Corrin
Deusch, Oliver
Holcombe, Lucy J.
The canine oral microbiome: variation in bacterial populations across different niches
title The canine oral microbiome: variation in bacterial populations across different niches
title_full The canine oral microbiome: variation in bacterial populations across different niches
title_fullStr The canine oral microbiome: variation in bacterial populations across different niches
title_full_unstemmed The canine oral microbiome: variation in bacterial populations across different niches
title_short The canine oral microbiome: variation in bacterial populations across different niches
title_sort canine oral microbiome: variation in bacterial populations across different niches
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7048056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32111160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-1704-3
work_keys_str_mv AT ruparellavika thecanineoralmicrobiomevariationinbacterialpopulationsacrossdifferentniches
AT inuitaichi thecanineoralmicrobiomevariationinbacterialpopulationsacrossdifferentniches
AT stauntonruth thecanineoralmicrobiomevariationinbacterialpopulationsacrossdifferentniches
AT walliscorrin thecanineoralmicrobiomevariationinbacterialpopulationsacrossdifferentniches
AT deuscholiver thecanineoralmicrobiomevariationinbacterialpopulationsacrossdifferentniches
AT holcombelucyj thecanineoralmicrobiomevariationinbacterialpopulationsacrossdifferentniches
AT ruparellavika canineoralmicrobiomevariationinbacterialpopulationsacrossdifferentniches
AT inuitaichi canineoralmicrobiomevariationinbacterialpopulationsacrossdifferentniches
AT stauntonruth canineoralmicrobiomevariationinbacterialpopulationsacrossdifferentniches
AT walliscorrin canineoralmicrobiomevariationinbacterialpopulationsacrossdifferentniches
AT deuscholiver canineoralmicrobiomevariationinbacterialpopulationsacrossdifferentniches
AT holcombelucyj canineoralmicrobiomevariationinbacterialpopulationsacrossdifferentniches