Cargando…

Amount and Intensity of Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Lower Cancer Risk

PURPOSE: To determine whether recommended amounts of leisure-time physical activity (ie, 7.5-15 metabolic equivalent task [MET] hours/week) are associated with lower cancer risk, describe the shape of the dose-response relationship, and explore associations with moderate- and vigorous-intensity phys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matthews, Charles E., Moore, Steven C., Arem, Hannah, Cook, Michael B., Trabert, Britton, Håkansson, Niclas, Larsson, Susanna C., Wolk, Alicja, Gapstur, Susan M., Lynch, Brigid M., Milne, Roger L., Freedman, Neal D., Huang, Wen-Yi, Berrington de Gonzalez, Amy, Kitahara, Cari M., Linet, Martha S., Shiroma, Eric J., Sandin, Sven, Patel, Alpa V., Lee, I-Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7048166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31877085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.02407
_version_ 1783502253392396288
author Matthews, Charles E.
Moore, Steven C.
Arem, Hannah
Cook, Michael B.
Trabert, Britton
Håkansson, Niclas
Larsson, Susanna C.
Wolk, Alicja
Gapstur, Susan M.
Lynch, Brigid M.
Milne, Roger L.
Freedman, Neal D.
Huang, Wen-Yi
Berrington de Gonzalez, Amy
Kitahara, Cari M.
Linet, Martha S.
Shiroma, Eric J.
Sandin, Sven
Patel, Alpa V.
Lee, I-Min
author_facet Matthews, Charles E.
Moore, Steven C.
Arem, Hannah
Cook, Michael B.
Trabert, Britton
Håkansson, Niclas
Larsson, Susanna C.
Wolk, Alicja
Gapstur, Susan M.
Lynch, Brigid M.
Milne, Roger L.
Freedman, Neal D.
Huang, Wen-Yi
Berrington de Gonzalez, Amy
Kitahara, Cari M.
Linet, Martha S.
Shiroma, Eric J.
Sandin, Sven
Patel, Alpa V.
Lee, I-Min
author_sort Matthews, Charles E.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine whether recommended amounts of leisure-time physical activity (ie, 7.5-15 metabolic equivalent task [MET] hours/week) are associated with lower cancer risk, describe the shape of the dose-response relationship, and explore associations with moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activity. METHODS: Data from 9 prospective cohorts with self-reported leisure-time physical activity and follow-up for cancer incidence were pooled. Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs of the relationships between physical activity with incidence of 15 types of cancer. Dose-response relationships were modeled with restricted cubic spline functions that compared 7.5, 15.0, 22.5, and 30.0 MET hours/week to no leisure-time physical activity, and statistically significant associations were determined using tests for trend (P < .05) and 95% CIs (< 1.0). RESULTS: A total of 755,459 participants (median age, 62 years [range, 32-91 years]; 53% female) were followed for 10.1 years, and 50,620 incident cancers accrued. Engagement in recommended amounts of activity (7.5-15 MET hours/week) was associated with a statistically significant lower risk of 7 of the 15 cancer types studied, including colon (8%-14% lower risk in men), breast (6%-10% lower risk), endometrial (10%-18% lower risk), kidney (11%-17% lower risk), myeloma (14%-19% lower risk), liver (18%-27% lower risk), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (11%-18% lower risk in women). The dose response was linear in shape for half of the associations and nonlinear for the others. Results for moderate- and vigorous-intensity leisure-time physical activity were mixed. Adjustment for body mass index eliminated the association with endometrial cancer but had limited effect on other cancer types. CONCLUSION: Health care providers, fitness professionals, and public health practitioners should encourage adults to adopt and maintain physical activity at recommended levels to lower risks of multiple cancers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7048166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Society of Clinical Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70481662020-03-02 Amount and Intensity of Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Lower Cancer Risk Matthews, Charles E. Moore, Steven C. Arem, Hannah Cook, Michael B. Trabert, Britton Håkansson, Niclas Larsson, Susanna C. Wolk, Alicja Gapstur, Susan M. Lynch, Brigid M. Milne, Roger L. Freedman, Neal D. Huang, Wen-Yi Berrington de Gonzalez, Amy Kitahara, Cari M. Linet, Martha S. Shiroma, Eric J. Sandin, Sven Patel, Alpa V. Lee, I-Min J Clin Oncol Original Reports PURPOSE: To determine whether recommended amounts of leisure-time physical activity (ie, 7.5-15 metabolic equivalent task [MET] hours/week) are associated with lower cancer risk, describe the shape of the dose-response relationship, and explore associations with moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activity. METHODS: Data from 9 prospective cohorts with self-reported leisure-time physical activity and follow-up for cancer incidence were pooled. Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs of the relationships between physical activity with incidence of 15 types of cancer. Dose-response relationships were modeled with restricted cubic spline functions that compared 7.5, 15.0, 22.5, and 30.0 MET hours/week to no leisure-time physical activity, and statistically significant associations were determined using tests for trend (P < .05) and 95% CIs (< 1.0). RESULTS: A total of 755,459 participants (median age, 62 years [range, 32-91 years]; 53% female) were followed for 10.1 years, and 50,620 incident cancers accrued. Engagement in recommended amounts of activity (7.5-15 MET hours/week) was associated with a statistically significant lower risk of 7 of the 15 cancer types studied, including colon (8%-14% lower risk in men), breast (6%-10% lower risk), endometrial (10%-18% lower risk), kidney (11%-17% lower risk), myeloma (14%-19% lower risk), liver (18%-27% lower risk), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (11%-18% lower risk in women). The dose response was linear in shape for half of the associations and nonlinear for the others. Results for moderate- and vigorous-intensity leisure-time physical activity were mixed. Adjustment for body mass index eliminated the association with endometrial cancer but had limited effect on other cancer types. CONCLUSION: Health care providers, fitness professionals, and public health practitioners should encourage adults to adopt and maintain physical activity at recommended levels to lower risks of multiple cancers. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020-03-01 2019-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7048166/ /pubmed/31877085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.02407 Text en © 2019 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Reports
Matthews, Charles E.
Moore, Steven C.
Arem, Hannah
Cook, Michael B.
Trabert, Britton
Håkansson, Niclas
Larsson, Susanna C.
Wolk, Alicja
Gapstur, Susan M.
Lynch, Brigid M.
Milne, Roger L.
Freedman, Neal D.
Huang, Wen-Yi
Berrington de Gonzalez, Amy
Kitahara, Cari M.
Linet, Martha S.
Shiroma, Eric J.
Sandin, Sven
Patel, Alpa V.
Lee, I-Min
Amount and Intensity of Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Lower Cancer Risk
title Amount and Intensity of Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Lower Cancer Risk
title_full Amount and Intensity of Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Lower Cancer Risk
title_fullStr Amount and Intensity of Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Lower Cancer Risk
title_full_unstemmed Amount and Intensity of Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Lower Cancer Risk
title_short Amount and Intensity of Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Lower Cancer Risk
title_sort amount and intensity of leisure-time physical activity and lower cancer risk
topic Original Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7048166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31877085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.02407
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewscharlese amountandintensityofleisuretimephysicalactivityandlowercancerrisk
AT moorestevenc amountandintensityofleisuretimephysicalactivityandlowercancerrisk
AT aremhannah amountandintensityofleisuretimephysicalactivityandlowercancerrisk
AT cookmichaelb amountandintensityofleisuretimephysicalactivityandlowercancerrisk
AT trabertbritton amountandintensityofleisuretimephysicalactivityandlowercancerrisk
AT hakanssonniclas amountandintensityofleisuretimephysicalactivityandlowercancerrisk
AT larssonsusannac amountandintensityofleisuretimephysicalactivityandlowercancerrisk
AT wolkalicja amountandintensityofleisuretimephysicalactivityandlowercancerrisk
AT gapstursusanm amountandintensityofleisuretimephysicalactivityandlowercancerrisk
AT lynchbrigidm amountandintensityofleisuretimephysicalactivityandlowercancerrisk
AT milnerogerl amountandintensityofleisuretimephysicalactivityandlowercancerrisk
AT freedmanneald amountandintensityofleisuretimephysicalactivityandlowercancerrisk
AT huangwenyi amountandintensityofleisuretimephysicalactivityandlowercancerrisk
AT berringtondegonzalezamy amountandintensityofleisuretimephysicalactivityandlowercancerrisk
AT kitaharacarim amountandintensityofleisuretimephysicalactivityandlowercancerrisk
AT linetmarthas amountandintensityofleisuretimephysicalactivityandlowercancerrisk
AT shiromaericj amountandintensityofleisuretimephysicalactivityandlowercancerrisk
AT sandinsven amountandintensityofleisuretimephysicalactivityandlowercancerrisk
AT patelalpav amountandintensityofleisuretimephysicalactivityandlowercancerrisk
AT leeimin amountandintensityofleisuretimephysicalactivityandlowercancerrisk