Cargando…

The UK BIO-TRAC Study: A Cross-Sectional Study of Product and Batch Traceability for Biologics in Clinical Practice and Electronic Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in the UK

INTRODUCTION: Due to the complexity of biologics and the inherent challenges for manufacturing, it is important to know the specific brand name and batch number of suspected biologics in adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the extent to which biologics...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klein, Kevin, Hazell, Lorna, Stolk, Pieter, Shakir, Saad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7048707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31872358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-019-00891-6
_version_ 1783502314802249728
author Klein, Kevin
Hazell, Lorna
Stolk, Pieter
Shakir, Saad
author_facet Klein, Kevin
Hazell, Lorna
Stolk, Pieter
Shakir, Saad
author_sort Klein, Kevin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Due to the complexity of biologics and the inherent challenges for manufacturing, it is important to know the specific brand name and batch number of suspected biologics in adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the extent to which biologics are traceable by brand name and batch number in UK hospital practice and in ADRs reported by patients and healthcare professionals. METHODS: We performed an online hospital pharmacist survey to capture information on how specific product details are recorded during the processes of prescribing, dispensing and administration of biologics in routine UK hospital practice. We also assessed the proportion of ADR reports specifying brand name and batch number from electronic ADR reports submitted to the UK national spontaneous reporting database, the Yellow Card Scheme, between 1 January 2009 and 30 September 2017. RESULTS: Brand name recording in routine hospital processes ranged from 79 to 91%, whereas batch numbers were less routinely recorded, ranging from 38 to 58%. Paper-based recording of product details was more commonly used for recording information. A total of 6108 electronic ADR reports were submitted to the Yellow Card Scheme for recombinant biologics, of which 38% and 15%, respectively, had an identifiable brand name and batch numbers. Whereas batch number traceability in electronic ADR reports improved slightly after the implementation of the European Union pharmacovigilance legislation in 2012, no improvement of brand name traceability was observed. CONCLUSION: Brand name and batch number traceability for biologics in UK ADR reports are generally low. Shortcomings in the systematic recording of product details in UK clinical practice may contribute to the limited traceability. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40264-019-00891-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7048707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70487072020-03-13 The UK BIO-TRAC Study: A Cross-Sectional Study of Product and Batch Traceability for Biologics in Clinical Practice and Electronic Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in the UK Klein, Kevin Hazell, Lorna Stolk, Pieter Shakir, Saad Drug Saf Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: Due to the complexity of biologics and the inherent challenges for manufacturing, it is important to know the specific brand name and batch number of suspected biologics in adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the extent to which biologics are traceable by brand name and batch number in UK hospital practice and in ADRs reported by patients and healthcare professionals. METHODS: We performed an online hospital pharmacist survey to capture information on how specific product details are recorded during the processes of prescribing, dispensing and administration of biologics in routine UK hospital practice. We also assessed the proportion of ADR reports specifying brand name and batch number from electronic ADR reports submitted to the UK national spontaneous reporting database, the Yellow Card Scheme, between 1 January 2009 and 30 September 2017. RESULTS: Brand name recording in routine hospital processes ranged from 79 to 91%, whereas batch numbers were less routinely recorded, ranging from 38 to 58%. Paper-based recording of product details was more commonly used for recording information. A total of 6108 electronic ADR reports were submitted to the Yellow Card Scheme for recombinant biologics, of which 38% and 15%, respectively, had an identifiable brand name and batch numbers. Whereas batch number traceability in electronic ADR reports improved slightly after the implementation of the European Union pharmacovigilance legislation in 2012, no improvement of brand name traceability was observed. CONCLUSION: Brand name and batch number traceability for biologics in UK ADR reports are generally low. Shortcomings in the systematic recording of product details in UK clinical practice may contribute to the limited traceability. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40264-019-00891-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-12-23 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7048707/ /pubmed/31872358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-019-00891-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Klein, Kevin
Hazell, Lorna
Stolk, Pieter
Shakir, Saad
The UK BIO-TRAC Study: A Cross-Sectional Study of Product and Batch Traceability for Biologics in Clinical Practice and Electronic Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in the UK
title The UK BIO-TRAC Study: A Cross-Sectional Study of Product and Batch Traceability for Biologics in Clinical Practice and Electronic Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in the UK
title_full The UK BIO-TRAC Study: A Cross-Sectional Study of Product and Batch Traceability for Biologics in Clinical Practice and Electronic Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in the UK
title_fullStr The UK BIO-TRAC Study: A Cross-Sectional Study of Product and Batch Traceability for Biologics in Clinical Practice and Electronic Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in the UK
title_full_unstemmed The UK BIO-TRAC Study: A Cross-Sectional Study of Product and Batch Traceability for Biologics in Clinical Practice and Electronic Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in the UK
title_short The UK BIO-TRAC Study: A Cross-Sectional Study of Product and Batch Traceability for Biologics in Clinical Practice and Electronic Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in the UK
title_sort uk bio-trac study: a cross-sectional study of product and batch traceability for biologics in clinical practice and electronic adverse drug reaction reporting in the uk
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7048707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31872358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-019-00891-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kleinkevin theukbiotracstudyacrosssectionalstudyofproductandbatchtraceabilityforbiologicsinclinicalpracticeandelectronicadversedrugreactionreportingintheuk
AT hazelllorna theukbiotracstudyacrosssectionalstudyofproductandbatchtraceabilityforbiologicsinclinicalpracticeandelectronicadversedrugreactionreportingintheuk
AT stolkpieter theukbiotracstudyacrosssectionalstudyofproductandbatchtraceabilityforbiologicsinclinicalpracticeandelectronicadversedrugreactionreportingintheuk
AT shakirsaad theukbiotracstudyacrosssectionalstudyofproductandbatchtraceabilityforbiologicsinclinicalpracticeandelectronicadversedrugreactionreportingintheuk
AT kleinkevin ukbiotracstudyacrosssectionalstudyofproductandbatchtraceabilityforbiologicsinclinicalpracticeandelectronicadversedrugreactionreportingintheuk
AT hazelllorna ukbiotracstudyacrosssectionalstudyofproductandbatchtraceabilityforbiologicsinclinicalpracticeandelectronicadversedrugreactionreportingintheuk
AT stolkpieter ukbiotracstudyacrosssectionalstudyofproductandbatchtraceabilityforbiologicsinclinicalpracticeandelectronicadversedrugreactionreportingintheuk
AT shakirsaad ukbiotracstudyacrosssectionalstudyofproductandbatchtraceabilityforbiologicsinclinicalpracticeandelectronicadversedrugreactionreportingintheuk