Cargando…
Artificial shaking signals in honey bee colonies elicit natural responses
Honey bee signals are primarily studied through natural observation combined with manipulations of the colony or environment, not direct manipulation of the signal stimulus or receivers. Consequently, we know little about which signal aspects are necessary to reproduce behavioral responses. Here, we...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7048926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32111924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60421-8 |
_version_ | 1783502365435887616 |
---|---|
author | Koenig, Phoebe A. Smith, Michael L. Horowitz, Logan H. Palmer, Daniel M. Petersen, Kirstin H. |
author_facet | Koenig, Phoebe A. Smith, Michael L. Horowitz, Logan H. Palmer, Daniel M. Petersen, Kirstin H. |
author_sort | Koenig, Phoebe A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Honey bee signals are primarily studied through natural observation combined with manipulations of the colony or environment, not direct manipulation of the signal stimulus or receivers. Consequently, we know little about which signal aspects are necessary to reproduce behavioral responses. Here, we focus on the shaking signal, wherein a worker grabs onto another bee and vibrates. All castes receive shaking signals, but individual responses depend on context, and the signal may be multi-modal (mechanical, odor, sound, etc.). We designed a tool to mimic the shaking signal. We tested whether a purely mechanical stimulus elicited the same behavioral response as a natural shaking signal, teasing apart the effects of signal and receiver characteristics. We found that both workers and drones increased their movement after being artificially shaken, and that shaken drones were more likely to engage in feeding and grooming than a sham control. These behavioral changes support the idea that the shaking signal serves to generally increase worker activity, but also serves to activate male reproductives (drones). With this tool, we show that vibration itself is responsible for eliciting much of the shaking signal’s behavioral response, in one of the few examples of direct playback in social insects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7048926 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70489262020-03-06 Artificial shaking signals in honey bee colonies elicit natural responses Koenig, Phoebe A. Smith, Michael L. Horowitz, Logan H. Palmer, Daniel M. Petersen, Kirstin H. Sci Rep Article Honey bee signals are primarily studied through natural observation combined with manipulations of the colony or environment, not direct manipulation of the signal stimulus or receivers. Consequently, we know little about which signal aspects are necessary to reproduce behavioral responses. Here, we focus on the shaking signal, wherein a worker grabs onto another bee and vibrates. All castes receive shaking signals, but individual responses depend on context, and the signal may be multi-modal (mechanical, odor, sound, etc.). We designed a tool to mimic the shaking signal. We tested whether a purely mechanical stimulus elicited the same behavioral response as a natural shaking signal, teasing apart the effects of signal and receiver characteristics. We found that both workers and drones increased their movement after being artificially shaken, and that shaken drones were more likely to engage in feeding and grooming than a sham control. These behavioral changes support the idea that the shaking signal serves to generally increase worker activity, but also serves to activate male reproductives (drones). With this tool, we show that vibration itself is responsible for eliciting much of the shaking signal’s behavioral response, in one of the few examples of direct playback in social insects. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7048926/ /pubmed/32111924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60421-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Koenig, Phoebe A. Smith, Michael L. Horowitz, Logan H. Palmer, Daniel M. Petersen, Kirstin H. Artificial shaking signals in honey bee colonies elicit natural responses |
title | Artificial shaking signals in honey bee colonies elicit natural responses |
title_full | Artificial shaking signals in honey bee colonies elicit natural responses |
title_fullStr | Artificial shaking signals in honey bee colonies elicit natural responses |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial shaking signals in honey bee colonies elicit natural responses |
title_short | Artificial shaking signals in honey bee colonies elicit natural responses |
title_sort | artificial shaking signals in honey bee colonies elicit natural responses |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7048926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32111924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60421-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koenigphoebea artificialshakingsignalsinhoneybeecolonieselicitnaturalresponses AT smithmichaell artificialshakingsignalsinhoneybeecolonieselicitnaturalresponses AT horowitzloganh artificialshakingsignalsinhoneybeecolonieselicitnaturalresponses AT palmerdanielm artificialshakingsignalsinhoneybeecolonieselicitnaturalresponses AT petersenkirstinh artificialshakingsignalsinhoneybeecolonieselicitnaturalresponses |