Cargando…

Artificial shaking signals in honey bee colonies elicit natural responses

Honey bee signals are primarily studied through natural observation combined with manipulations of the colony or environment, not direct manipulation of the signal stimulus or receivers. Consequently, we know little about which signal aspects are necessary to reproduce behavioral responses. Here, we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koenig, Phoebe A., Smith, Michael L., Horowitz, Logan H., Palmer, Daniel M., Petersen, Kirstin H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7048926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32111924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60421-8
_version_ 1783502365435887616
author Koenig, Phoebe A.
Smith, Michael L.
Horowitz, Logan H.
Palmer, Daniel M.
Petersen, Kirstin H.
author_facet Koenig, Phoebe A.
Smith, Michael L.
Horowitz, Logan H.
Palmer, Daniel M.
Petersen, Kirstin H.
author_sort Koenig, Phoebe A.
collection PubMed
description Honey bee signals are primarily studied through natural observation combined with manipulations of the colony or environment, not direct manipulation of the signal stimulus or receivers. Consequently, we know little about which signal aspects are necessary to reproduce behavioral responses. Here, we focus on the shaking signal, wherein a worker grabs onto another bee and vibrates. All castes receive shaking signals, but individual responses depend on context, and the signal may be multi-modal (mechanical, odor, sound, etc.). We designed a tool to mimic the shaking signal. We tested whether a purely mechanical stimulus elicited the same behavioral response as a natural shaking signal, teasing apart the effects of signal and receiver characteristics. We found that both workers and drones increased their movement after being artificially shaken, and that shaken drones were more likely to engage in feeding and grooming than a sham control. These behavioral changes support the idea that the shaking signal serves to generally increase worker activity, but also serves to activate male reproductives (drones). With this tool, we show that vibration itself is responsible for eliciting much of the shaking signal’s behavioral response, in one of the few examples of direct playback in social insects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7048926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70489262020-03-06 Artificial shaking signals in honey bee colonies elicit natural responses Koenig, Phoebe A. Smith, Michael L. Horowitz, Logan H. Palmer, Daniel M. Petersen, Kirstin H. Sci Rep Article Honey bee signals are primarily studied through natural observation combined with manipulations of the colony or environment, not direct manipulation of the signal stimulus or receivers. Consequently, we know little about which signal aspects are necessary to reproduce behavioral responses. Here, we focus on the shaking signal, wherein a worker grabs onto another bee and vibrates. All castes receive shaking signals, but individual responses depend on context, and the signal may be multi-modal (mechanical, odor, sound, etc.). We designed a tool to mimic the shaking signal. We tested whether a purely mechanical stimulus elicited the same behavioral response as a natural shaking signal, teasing apart the effects of signal and receiver characteristics. We found that both workers and drones increased their movement after being artificially shaken, and that shaken drones were more likely to engage in feeding and grooming than a sham control. These behavioral changes support the idea that the shaking signal serves to generally increase worker activity, but also serves to activate male reproductives (drones). With this tool, we show that vibration itself is responsible for eliciting much of the shaking signal’s behavioral response, in one of the few examples of direct playback in social insects. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7048926/ /pubmed/32111924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60421-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Koenig, Phoebe A.
Smith, Michael L.
Horowitz, Logan H.
Palmer, Daniel M.
Petersen, Kirstin H.
Artificial shaking signals in honey bee colonies elicit natural responses
title Artificial shaking signals in honey bee colonies elicit natural responses
title_full Artificial shaking signals in honey bee colonies elicit natural responses
title_fullStr Artificial shaking signals in honey bee colonies elicit natural responses
title_full_unstemmed Artificial shaking signals in honey bee colonies elicit natural responses
title_short Artificial shaking signals in honey bee colonies elicit natural responses
title_sort artificial shaking signals in honey bee colonies elicit natural responses
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7048926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32111924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60421-8
work_keys_str_mv AT koenigphoebea artificialshakingsignalsinhoneybeecolonieselicitnaturalresponses
AT smithmichaell artificialshakingsignalsinhoneybeecolonieselicitnaturalresponses
AT horowitzloganh artificialshakingsignalsinhoneybeecolonieselicitnaturalresponses
AT palmerdanielm artificialshakingsignalsinhoneybeecolonieselicitnaturalresponses
AT petersenkirstinh artificialshakingsignalsinhoneybeecolonieselicitnaturalresponses