Cargando…
Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better?
Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment is an important step before study initiation usage. Therefore, accurately judging study type is the first priority, and the choosing proper tool is also important. In this review, we introduced methodological quality assessment tools for randomized co...
Autores principales: | Ma, Lin-Lu, Wang, Yun-Yun, Yang, Zhi-Hua, Huang, Di, Weng, Hong, Zeng, Xian-Tao |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7049186/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32111253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Primary and Secondary Amputation—Which?
Publicado: (1880) -
Systematic Review on Which Analytics and Learning Methodologies Are Applied in Primary and Secondary Education in the Learning of Robotics Sensors
por: Amo, Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Prognostic tools or clinical predictions: Which are better in palliative care?
por: Stone, P., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Comparison of tools for assessing the methodological quality of primary and secondary studies in health technology assessment reports in Germany
por: Dreier, Maren, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Correction: Prognostic tools or clinical predictions: Which are better in palliative care?
Publicado: (2021)