Cargando…

Efficacy of Hemospray in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Recently, amongst other hemostatic modalities, Hemospray (TC-325) has emerged as an effective method for managing patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of Hemospray in patients with n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aziz, Muhammad, Weissman, Simcha, Mehta, Tej I., Hassan, Shafae, Khan, Zubair, Fatima, Rawish, Tsirlin, Yuriy, Hassan, Ammar, Sciarra, Michael, Nawras, Ali, Rastogi, Amit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7049242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32127735
http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2020.0448
_version_ 1783502401284603904
author Aziz, Muhammad
Weissman, Simcha
Mehta, Tej I.
Hassan, Shafae
Khan, Zubair
Fatima, Rawish
Tsirlin, Yuriy
Hassan, Ammar
Sciarra, Michael
Nawras, Ali
Rastogi, Amit
author_facet Aziz, Muhammad
Weissman, Simcha
Mehta, Tej I.
Hassan, Shafae
Khan, Zubair
Fatima, Rawish
Tsirlin, Yuriy
Hassan, Ammar
Sciarra, Michael
Nawras, Ali
Rastogi, Amit
author_sort Aziz, Muhammad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently, amongst other hemostatic modalities, Hemospray (TC-325) has emerged as an effective method for managing patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of Hemospray in patients with non-variceal upper GIB. METHODS: Our primary outcomes were clinical and technical success; secondary outcomes were aggregate rebleeding, early rebleeding, delayed rebleeding, refractory bleeding, mortality, and treatment failure. A meta-analysis of proportions was conducted for all reported primary and secondary outcomes. A relative risk meta-analysis was conducted for studies reporting direct comparisons between Hemospray and other hemostatic measures. RESULTS: A total of 20 studies with 1280 patients were included in the final analysis. Technical success of Hemospray was seen in 97% of cases (95% confidence interval [CI] 94-98%, I(2)=52.89%) and a significant trend towards increasing technical success was seen during publication years 2011-2019. Clinical success of Hemospray was seen in 91% of cases (95%CI 88-94%, I(2)=47.72%), compared to 87% (95%CI 75-94%, I(2)=0.00%) for other hemostatic measures. The secondary outcomes of aggregate rebleeding, early rebleeding, delayed rebleeding, refractory rebleeding, mortality and treatment failure following the use of Hemospray were seen in 27%, 20%, 9%, 8%, 8%, and 31% of cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: Hemospray is safe, effective and non-inferior to traditional hemostatic measures for the management of non-variceal upper GIB, and can thus be used as an alternative option.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7049242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70492422020-03-04 Efficacy of Hemospray in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review with meta-analysis Aziz, Muhammad Weissman, Simcha Mehta, Tej I. Hassan, Shafae Khan, Zubair Fatima, Rawish Tsirlin, Yuriy Hassan, Ammar Sciarra, Michael Nawras, Ali Rastogi, Amit Ann Gastroenterol Original Article BACKGROUND: Recently, amongst other hemostatic modalities, Hemospray (TC-325) has emerged as an effective method for managing patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of Hemospray in patients with non-variceal upper GIB. METHODS: Our primary outcomes were clinical and technical success; secondary outcomes were aggregate rebleeding, early rebleeding, delayed rebleeding, refractory bleeding, mortality, and treatment failure. A meta-analysis of proportions was conducted for all reported primary and secondary outcomes. A relative risk meta-analysis was conducted for studies reporting direct comparisons between Hemospray and other hemostatic measures. RESULTS: A total of 20 studies with 1280 patients were included in the final analysis. Technical success of Hemospray was seen in 97% of cases (95% confidence interval [CI] 94-98%, I(2)=52.89%) and a significant trend towards increasing technical success was seen during publication years 2011-2019. Clinical success of Hemospray was seen in 91% of cases (95%CI 88-94%, I(2)=47.72%), compared to 87% (95%CI 75-94%, I(2)=0.00%) for other hemostatic measures. The secondary outcomes of aggregate rebleeding, early rebleeding, delayed rebleeding, refractory rebleeding, mortality and treatment failure following the use of Hemospray were seen in 27%, 20%, 9%, 8%, 8%, and 31% of cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: Hemospray is safe, effective and non-inferior to traditional hemostatic measures for the management of non-variceal upper GIB, and can thus be used as an alternative option. Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology 2020 2020-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7049242/ /pubmed/32127735 http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2020.0448 Text en Copyright: © Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Aziz, Muhammad
Weissman, Simcha
Mehta, Tej I.
Hassan, Shafae
Khan, Zubair
Fatima, Rawish
Tsirlin, Yuriy
Hassan, Ammar
Sciarra, Michael
Nawras, Ali
Rastogi, Amit
Efficacy of Hemospray in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review with meta-analysis
title Efficacy of Hemospray in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy of Hemospray in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of Hemospray in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Hemospray in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy of Hemospray in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy of hemospray in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review with meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7049242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32127735
http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2020.0448
work_keys_str_mv AT azizmuhammad efficacyofhemosprayinnonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT weissmansimcha efficacyofhemosprayinnonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT mehtateji efficacyofhemosprayinnonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT hassanshafae efficacyofhemosprayinnonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT khanzubair efficacyofhemosprayinnonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT fatimarawish efficacyofhemosprayinnonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT tsirlinyuriy efficacyofhemosprayinnonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT hassanammar efficacyofhemosprayinnonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT sciarramichael efficacyofhemosprayinnonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT nawrasali efficacyofhemosprayinnonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT rastogiamit efficacyofhemosprayinnonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis