Cargando…

Prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer using a deep learning (DL) method

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to develop a deep learning (DL) algorithm to evaluate the pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. METHODS: A total of 302 breast cancer patients in this retrospective study were randomly divided into a training set (n = ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qu, Yu‐Hong, Zhu, Hai‐Tao, Cao, Kun, Li, Xiao‐Ting, Ye, Meng, Sun, Ying‐Shi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7049483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31944571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13309
_version_ 1783502450192285696
author Qu, Yu‐Hong
Zhu, Hai‐Tao
Cao, Kun
Li, Xiao‐Ting
Ye, Meng
Sun, Ying‐Shi
author_facet Qu, Yu‐Hong
Zhu, Hai‐Tao
Cao, Kun
Li, Xiao‐Ting
Ye, Meng
Sun, Ying‐Shi
author_sort Qu, Yu‐Hong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to develop a deep learning (DL) algorithm to evaluate the pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. METHODS: A total of 302 breast cancer patients in this retrospective study were randomly divided into a training set (n = 244) and a validation set (n = 58). Tumor regions were manually delineated on each slice by two expert radiologists on enhanced T1‐weighted images. Pathological results were used as ground truth. Deep learning network contained five repetitions of convolution and max‐pooling layers and ended with three dense layers. The pre‐NAC model and post‐NAC model inputted six phases of pre‐NAC and post‐NAC images, respectively. The combined model used 12 channels from six phases of pre‐NAC and six phases of post‐NAC images. All models above included three indexes of molecular type as one additional input channel. RESULTS: The training set contained 137 non‐pCR and 107 pCR participants. The validation set contained 33 non‐pCR and 25 pCR participants. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of three models was 0.553 for pre‐NAC, 0.968 for post‐NAC and 0.970 for the combined data, respectively. A significant difference was found in AUC between using pre‐NAC data alone and combined data (P < 0.001). The positive predictive value of the combined model was greater than that of the post‐NAC model (100% vs. 82.8%, P = 0.033). CONCLUSION: This study established a deep learning model to predict PCR status after neoadjuvant therapy by combining pre‐NAC and post‐NAC MRI data. The model performed better than using pre‐NAC data only, and also performed better than using post‐NAC data only. KEY POINTS: Significant findings of the study. It achieved an AUC of 0.968 for pCR prediction. It showed a significantly greater AUC than using pre‐NAC data only. What this study adds This study established a deep learning model to predict PCR status after neoadjuvant therapy by combining pre‐NAC and post‐NAC MRI data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7049483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70494832020-03-05 Prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer using a deep learning (DL) method Qu, Yu‐Hong Zhu, Hai‐Tao Cao, Kun Li, Xiao‐Ting Ye, Meng Sun, Ying‐Shi Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to develop a deep learning (DL) algorithm to evaluate the pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. METHODS: A total of 302 breast cancer patients in this retrospective study were randomly divided into a training set (n = 244) and a validation set (n = 58). Tumor regions were manually delineated on each slice by two expert radiologists on enhanced T1‐weighted images. Pathological results were used as ground truth. Deep learning network contained five repetitions of convolution and max‐pooling layers and ended with three dense layers. The pre‐NAC model and post‐NAC model inputted six phases of pre‐NAC and post‐NAC images, respectively. The combined model used 12 channels from six phases of pre‐NAC and six phases of post‐NAC images. All models above included three indexes of molecular type as one additional input channel. RESULTS: The training set contained 137 non‐pCR and 107 pCR participants. The validation set contained 33 non‐pCR and 25 pCR participants. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of three models was 0.553 for pre‐NAC, 0.968 for post‐NAC and 0.970 for the combined data, respectively. A significant difference was found in AUC between using pre‐NAC data alone and combined data (P < 0.001). The positive predictive value of the combined model was greater than that of the post‐NAC model (100% vs. 82.8%, P = 0.033). CONCLUSION: This study established a deep learning model to predict PCR status after neoadjuvant therapy by combining pre‐NAC and post‐NAC MRI data. The model performed better than using pre‐NAC data only, and also performed better than using post‐NAC data only. KEY POINTS: Significant findings of the study. It achieved an AUC of 0.968 for pCR prediction. It showed a significantly greater AUC than using pre‐NAC data only. What this study adds This study established a deep learning model to predict PCR status after neoadjuvant therapy by combining pre‐NAC and post‐NAC MRI data. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020-01-16 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7049483/ /pubmed/31944571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13309 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Qu, Yu‐Hong
Zhu, Hai‐Tao
Cao, Kun
Li, Xiao‐Ting
Ye, Meng
Sun, Ying‐Shi
Prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer using a deep learning (DL) method
title Prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer using a deep learning (DL) method
title_full Prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer using a deep learning (DL) method
title_fullStr Prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer using a deep learning (DL) method
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer using a deep learning (DL) method
title_short Prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer using a deep learning (DL) method
title_sort prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer using a deep learning (dl) method
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7049483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31944571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13309
work_keys_str_mv AT quyuhong predictionofpathologicalcompleteresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinbreastcancerusingadeeplearningdlmethod
AT zhuhaitao predictionofpathologicalcompleteresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinbreastcancerusingadeeplearningdlmethod
AT caokun predictionofpathologicalcompleteresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinbreastcancerusingadeeplearningdlmethod
AT lixiaoting predictionofpathologicalcompleteresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinbreastcancerusingadeeplearningdlmethod
AT yemeng predictionofpathologicalcompleteresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinbreastcancerusingadeeplearningdlmethod
AT sunyingshi predictionofpathologicalcompleteresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinbreastcancerusingadeeplearningdlmethod