Cargando…

Comparison of Orexin 1 and Orexin 2 Ligand Binding Modes Using X-ray Crystallography and Computational Analysis

[Image: see text] The orexin system, which consists of the two G protein-coupled receptors OX(1) and OX(2), activated by the neuropeptides OX-A and OX-B, is firmly established as a key regulator of behavioral arousal, sleep, and wakefulness and has been an area of intense research effort over the pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rappas, Mathieu, Ali, Ammar A. E., Bennett, Kirstie A., Brown, Jason D., Bucknell, Sarah J., Congreve, Miles, Cooke, Robert M., Cseke, Gabriella, de Graaf, Chris, Doré, Andrew S., Errey, James C., Jazayeri, Ali, Marshall, Fiona H., Mason, Jonathan S., Mould, Richard, Patel, Jayesh C., Tehan, Benjamin G., Weir, Malcolm, Christopher, John A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7050010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31860301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01787
_version_ 1783502551880040448
author Rappas, Mathieu
Ali, Ammar A. E.
Bennett, Kirstie A.
Brown, Jason D.
Bucknell, Sarah J.
Congreve, Miles
Cooke, Robert M.
Cseke, Gabriella
de Graaf, Chris
Doré, Andrew S.
Errey, James C.
Jazayeri, Ali
Marshall, Fiona H.
Mason, Jonathan S.
Mould, Richard
Patel, Jayesh C.
Tehan, Benjamin G.
Weir, Malcolm
Christopher, John A.
author_facet Rappas, Mathieu
Ali, Ammar A. E.
Bennett, Kirstie A.
Brown, Jason D.
Bucknell, Sarah J.
Congreve, Miles
Cooke, Robert M.
Cseke, Gabriella
de Graaf, Chris
Doré, Andrew S.
Errey, James C.
Jazayeri, Ali
Marshall, Fiona H.
Mason, Jonathan S.
Mould, Richard
Patel, Jayesh C.
Tehan, Benjamin G.
Weir, Malcolm
Christopher, John A.
author_sort Rappas, Mathieu
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The orexin system, which consists of the two G protein-coupled receptors OX(1) and OX(2), activated by the neuropeptides OX-A and OX-B, is firmly established as a key regulator of behavioral arousal, sleep, and wakefulness and has been an area of intense research effort over the past two decades. X-ray structures of the receptors in complex with 10 new antagonist ligands from diverse chemotypes are presented, which complement the existing structural information for the system and highlight the critical importance of lipophilic hotspots and water molecules for these peptidergic GPCR targets. Learnings from the structural information regarding the utility of pharmacophore models and how selectivity between OX(1) and OX(2) can be achieved are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7050010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70500102020-03-03 Comparison of Orexin 1 and Orexin 2 Ligand Binding Modes Using X-ray Crystallography and Computational Analysis Rappas, Mathieu Ali, Ammar A. E. Bennett, Kirstie A. Brown, Jason D. Bucknell, Sarah J. Congreve, Miles Cooke, Robert M. Cseke, Gabriella de Graaf, Chris Doré, Andrew S. Errey, James C. Jazayeri, Ali Marshall, Fiona H. Mason, Jonathan S. Mould, Richard Patel, Jayesh C. Tehan, Benjamin G. Weir, Malcolm Christopher, John A. J Med Chem [Image: see text] The orexin system, which consists of the two G protein-coupled receptors OX(1) and OX(2), activated by the neuropeptides OX-A and OX-B, is firmly established as a key regulator of behavioral arousal, sleep, and wakefulness and has been an area of intense research effort over the past two decades. X-ray structures of the receptors in complex with 10 new antagonist ligands from diverse chemotypes are presented, which complement the existing structural information for the system and highlight the critical importance of lipophilic hotspots and water molecules for these peptidergic GPCR targets. Learnings from the structural information regarding the utility of pharmacophore models and how selectivity between OX(1) and OX(2) can be achieved are discussed. American Chemical Society 2019-12-20 2020-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7050010/ /pubmed/31860301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01787 Text en Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Rappas, Mathieu
Ali, Ammar A. E.
Bennett, Kirstie A.
Brown, Jason D.
Bucknell, Sarah J.
Congreve, Miles
Cooke, Robert M.
Cseke, Gabriella
de Graaf, Chris
Doré, Andrew S.
Errey, James C.
Jazayeri, Ali
Marshall, Fiona H.
Mason, Jonathan S.
Mould, Richard
Patel, Jayesh C.
Tehan, Benjamin G.
Weir, Malcolm
Christopher, John A.
Comparison of Orexin 1 and Orexin 2 Ligand Binding Modes Using X-ray Crystallography and Computational Analysis
title Comparison of Orexin 1 and Orexin 2 Ligand Binding Modes Using X-ray Crystallography and Computational Analysis
title_full Comparison of Orexin 1 and Orexin 2 Ligand Binding Modes Using X-ray Crystallography and Computational Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of Orexin 1 and Orexin 2 Ligand Binding Modes Using X-ray Crystallography and Computational Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Orexin 1 and Orexin 2 Ligand Binding Modes Using X-ray Crystallography and Computational Analysis
title_short Comparison of Orexin 1 and Orexin 2 Ligand Binding Modes Using X-ray Crystallography and Computational Analysis
title_sort comparison of orexin 1 and orexin 2 ligand binding modes using x-ray crystallography and computational analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7050010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31860301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01787
work_keys_str_mv AT rappasmathieu comparisonoforexin1andorexin2ligandbindingmodesusingxraycrystallographyandcomputationalanalysis
AT aliammarae comparisonoforexin1andorexin2ligandbindingmodesusingxraycrystallographyandcomputationalanalysis
AT bennettkirstiea comparisonoforexin1andorexin2ligandbindingmodesusingxraycrystallographyandcomputationalanalysis
AT brownjasond comparisonoforexin1andorexin2ligandbindingmodesusingxraycrystallographyandcomputationalanalysis
AT bucknellsarahj comparisonoforexin1andorexin2ligandbindingmodesusingxraycrystallographyandcomputationalanalysis
AT congrevemiles comparisonoforexin1andorexin2ligandbindingmodesusingxraycrystallographyandcomputationalanalysis
AT cookerobertm comparisonoforexin1andorexin2ligandbindingmodesusingxraycrystallographyandcomputationalanalysis
AT csekegabriella comparisonoforexin1andorexin2ligandbindingmodesusingxraycrystallographyandcomputationalanalysis
AT degraafchris comparisonoforexin1andorexin2ligandbindingmodesusingxraycrystallographyandcomputationalanalysis
AT doreandrews comparisonoforexin1andorexin2ligandbindingmodesusingxraycrystallographyandcomputationalanalysis
AT erreyjamesc comparisonoforexin1andorexin2ligandbindingmodesusingxraycrystallographyandcomputationalanalysis
AT jazayeriali comparisonoforexin1andorexin2ligandbindingmodesusingxraycrystallographyandcomputationalanalysis
AT marshallfionah comparisonoforexin1andorexin2ligandbindingmodesusingxraycrystallographyandcomputationalanalysis
AT masonjonathans comparisonoforexin1andorexin2ligandbindingmodesusingxraycrystallographyandcomputationalanalysis
AT mouldrichard comparisonoforexin1andorexin2ligandbindingmodesusingxraycrystallographyandcomputationalanalysis
AT pateljayeshc comparisonoforexin1andorexin2ligandbindingmodesusingxraycrystallographyandcomputationalanalysis
AT tehanbenjaming comparisonoforexin1andorexin2ligandbindingmodesusingxraycrystallographyandcomputationalanalysis
AT weirmalcolm comparisonoforexin1andorexin2ligandbindingmodesusingxraycrystallographyandcomputationalanalysis
AT christopherjohna comparisonoforexin1andorexin2ligandbindingmodesusingxraycrystallographyandcomputationalanalysis