Cargando…

First-Line Systemic Treatments for Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in California: Patterns of Care and Outcomes in a Real-World Setting

BACKGROUND: Multiple systemic treatments have been developed for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but their use and effect on outcomes at the population level are unknown. This study describes the utilization of first-line systemic treatments among stage IV NSCLC patients in California a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maguire, Frances B, Morris, Cyllene R, Parikh-Patel, Arti, Cress, Rosemary D, Keegan, Theresa H M, Li, Chin-Shang, Lin, Patrick S, Kizer, Kenneth W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7050031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32328551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkz020
_version_ 1783502555641282560
author Maguire, Frances B
Morris, Cyllene R
Parikh-Patel, Arti
Cress, Rosemary D
Keegan, Theresa H M
Li, Chin-Shang
Lin, Patrick S
Kizer, Kenneth W
author_facet Maguire, Frances B
Morris, Cyllene R
Parikh-Patel, Arti
Cress, Rosemary D
Keegan, Theresa H M
Li, Chin-Shang
Lin, Patrick S
Kizer, Kenneth W
author_sort Maguire, Frances B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multiple systemic treatments have been developed for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but their use and effect on outcomes at the population level are unknown. This study describes the utilization of first-line systemic treatments among stage IV NSCLC patients in California and compares survival among treatment groups. METHODS: Data on 17 254 patients diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC from 2012 to 2014 were obtained from the California Cancer Registry. Systemic treatments were classified into six groups. The Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare survival between treatment groups. RESULTS: Fifty-one percent of patients were known to have received systemic treatment. For patients with nonsquamous histology, pemetrexed regimens were the most common treatment (14.8%) followed by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (11.9%) and platinum doublets (11.5%). Few patients received pemetrexed/bevacizumab combinations (4.5%), bevacizumab combinations (3.6%), or single agents (1.7%). There was statistically significantly better overall survival for those on pemetrexed regimens (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.80 to 0.92), bevacizumab regimens (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.81), pemetrexed/bevacizumab regimens (HR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.61 to 0.76), or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (HR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.57 to 0.67) compared with platinum doublets. The odds of receiving most systemic treatments decreased with decreasing socioeconomic status. For patients with squamous histology, platinum doublets were predominant (33.7%) and were not found to have statistically significantly different overall survival from single agents. CONCLUSIONS: These population-level findings indicate low utilization of systemic treatments, survival differences between treatment groups, and evident treatment disparities by socioeconomic status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7050031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70500312020-04-23 First-Line Systemic Treatments for Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in California: Patterns of Care and Outcomes in a Real-World Setting Maguire, Frances B Morris, Cyllene R Parikh-Patel, Arti Cress, Rosemary D Keegan, Theresa H M Li, Chin-Shang Lin, Patrick S Kizer, Kenneth W JNCI Cancer Spectr Article BACKGROUND: Multiple systemic treatments have been developed for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but their use and effect on outcomes at the population level are unknown. This study describes the utilization of first-line systemic treatments among stage IV NSCLC patients in California and compares survival among treatment groups. METHODS: Data on 17 254 patients diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC from 2012 to 2014 were obtained from the California Cancer Registry. Systemic treatments were classified into six groups. The Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare survival between treatment groups. RESULTS: Fifty-one percent of patients were known to have received systemic treatment. For patients with nonsquamous histology, pemetrexed regimens were the most common treatment (14.8%) followed by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (11.9%) and platinum doublets (11.5%). Few patients received pemetrexed/bevacizumab combinations (4.5%), bevacizumab combinations (3.6%), or single agents (1.7%). There was statistically significantly better overall survival for those on pemetrexed regimens (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.80 to 0.92), bevacizumab regimens (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.81), pemetrexed/bevacizumab regimens (HR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.61 to 0.76), or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (HR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.57 to 0.67) compared with platinum doublets. The odds of receiving most systemic treatments decreased with decreasing socioeconomic status. For patients with squamous histology, platinum doublets were predominant (33.7%) and were not found to have statistically significantly different overall survival from single agents. CONCLUSIONS: These population-level findings indicate low utilization of systemic treatments, survival differences between treatment groups, and evident treatment disparities by socioeconomic status. Oxford University Press 2019-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7050031/ /pubmed/32328551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkz020 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Article
Maguire, Frances B
Morris, Cyllene R
Parikh-Patel, Arti
Cress, Rosemary D
Keegan, Theresa H M
Li, Chin-Shang
Lin, Patrick S
Kizer, Kenneth W
First-Line Systemic Treatments for Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in California: Patterns of Care and Outcomes in a Real-World Setting
title First-Line Systemic Treatments for Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in California: Patterns of Care and Outcomes in a Real-World Setting
title_full First-Line Systemic Treatments for Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in California: Patterns of Care and Outcomes in a Real-World Setting
title_fullStr First-Line Systemic Treatments for Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in California: Patterns of Care and Outcomes in a Real-World Setting
title_full_unstemmed First-Line Systemic Treatments for Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in California: Patterns of Care and Outcomes in a Real-World Setting
title_short First-Line Systemic Treatments for Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in California: Patterns of Care and Outcomes in a Real-World Setting
title_sort first-line systemic treatments for stage iv non-small cell lung cancer in california: patterns of care and outcomes in a real-world setting
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7050031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32328551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkz020
work_keys_str_mv AT maguirefrancesb firstlinesystemictreatmentsforstageivnonsmallcelllungcancerincaliforniapatternsofcareandoutcomesinarealworldsetting
AT morriscyllener firstlinesystemictreatmentsforstageivnonsmallcelllungcancerincaliforniapatternsofcareandoutcomesinarealworldsetting
AT parikhpatelarti firstlinesystemictreatmentsforstageivnonsmallcelllungcancerincaliforniapatternsofcareandoutcomesinarealworldsetting
AT cressrosemaryd firstlinesystemictreatmentsforstageivnonsmallcelllungcancerincaliforniapatternsofcareandoutcomesinarealworldsetting
AT keegantheresahm firstlinesystemictreatmentsforstageivnonsmallcelllungcancerincaliforniapatternsofcareandoutcomesinarealworldsetting
AT lichinshang firstlinesystemictreatmentsforstageivnonsmallcelllungcancerincaliforniapatternsofcareandoutcomesinarealworldsetting
AT linpatricks firstlinesystemictreatmentsforstageivnonsmallcelllungcancerincaliforniapatternsofcareandoutcomesinarealworldsetting
AT kizerkennethw firstlinesystemictreatmentsforstageivnonsmallcelllungcancerincaliforniapatternsofcareandoutcomesinarealworldsetting