Cargando…

Knowledge and Practices of Endotracheal Suctioning amongst Nursing Professionals: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION: Ventilator-associated pneumonia, a common cause of mortality and morbidity, is commonly seen among patients with endotracheal intubation due to unsafe suctioning practices by health professionals. OBJECTIVE: A systematic review was conducted to explore the gaps in the existing practice...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pinto, Halita J, D'silva, Fatima, Sanil, Thankappan S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7050166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32148345
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23326
_version_ 1783502582521528320
author Pinto, Halita J
D'silva, Fatima
Sanil, Thankappan S
author_facet Pinto, Halita J
D'silva, Fatima
Sanil, Thankappan S
author_sort Pinto, Halita J
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Ventilator-associated pneumonia, a common cause of mortality and morbidity, is commonly seen among patients with endotracheal intubation due to unsafe suctioning practices by health professionals. OBJECTIVE: A systematic review was conducted to explore the gaps in the existing practices of nurses and thus proposing comprehensive guidelines for safe practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A two-phase strategy was adopted to identify the studies through a comprehensive electronic search in PubMed, Google Scholar, ProQuest, Ovid, and Helinet Summon by using predefined keywords within a year limit of 2002–2016. The quality of studies was reviewed using tools endorsed by Joanna Briggs Institute. This review was conducted according to the guidelines described in the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). Qualitative data were described through the process of metasynthesis. Quantitative analysis was performed to combine the competent quantitative evidences to identify knowledge and practices of endotracheal suctioning (ETS). RESULTS: Thirty studies had been subjected for metasynthesis, among which six provided relevant information for quantitative analysis. Quantitative analysis of the studies reported that only 36% of the nurses had assessed patients prior to suctioning and had knowledge about the size of the suction catheter while only 46% were aware of the appropriate suction pressure to be used for ETS. Handwashing compliance prior to suctioning was observed in only 62% of the nurses. It is reported that, despite the awareness on possible complications, nurses fail to adhere to the recommended practice guidelines. CONCLUSION: The current review would explore the best evidence-based practices (EBPs) among nurses related to ETS, which would ensure quality care to critically ill patients. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Pinto HJ, D'silva F, Sanil TS. Knowledge and Practices of Endotracheal Suctioning amongst Nursing Professionals: A Systematic Review. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(1):23–32.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7050166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70501662020-03-06 Knowledge and Practices of Endotracheal Suctioning amongst Nursing Professionals: A Systematic Review Pinto, Halita J D'silva, Fatima Sanil, Thankappan S Indian J Crit Care Med Original Research INTRODUCTION: Ventilator-associated pneumonia, a common cause of mortality and morbidity, is commonly seen among patients with endotracheal intubation due to unsafe suctioning practices by health professionals. OBJECTIVE: A systematic review was conducted to explore the gaps in the existing practices of nurses and thus proposing comprehensive guidelines for safe practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A two-phase strategy was adopted to identify the studies through a comprehensive electronic search in PubMed, Google Scholar, ProQuest, Ovid, and Helinet Summon by using predefined keywords within a year limit of 2002–2016. The quality of studies was reviewed using tools endorsed by Joanna Briggs Institute. This review was conducted according to the guidelines described in the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). Qualitative data were described through the process of metasynthesis. Quantitative analysis was performed to combine the competent quantitative evidences to identify knowledge and practices of endotracheal suctioning (ETS). RESULTS: Thirty studies had been subjected for metasynthesis, among which six provided relevant information for quantitative analysis. Quantitative analysis of the studies reported that only 36% of the nurses had assessed patients prior to suctioning and had knowledge about the size of the suction catheter while only 46% were aware of the appropriate suction pressure to be used for ETS. Handwashing compliance prior to suctioning was observed in only 62% of the nurses. It is reported that, despite the awareness on possible complications, nurses fail to adhere to the recommended practice guidelines. CONCLUSION: The current review would explore the best evidence-based practices (EBPs) among nurses related to ETS, which would ensure quality care to critically ill patients. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Pinto HJ, D'silva F, Sanil TS. Knowledge and Practices of Endotracheal Suctioning amongst Nursing Professionals: A Systematic Review. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(1):23–32. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7050166/ /pubmed/32148345 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23326 Text en Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Pinto, Halita J
D'silva, Fatima
Sanil, Thankappan S
Knowledge and Practices of Endotracheal Suctioning amongst Nursing Professionals: A Systematic Review
title Knowledge and Practices of Endotracheal Suctioning amongst Nursing Professionals: A Systematic Review
title_full Knowledge and Practices of Endotracheal Suctioning amongst Nursing Professionals: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Knowledge and Practices of Endotracheal Suctioning amongst Nursing Professionals: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge and Practices of Endotracheal Suctioning amongst Nursing Professionals: A Systematic Review
title_short Knowledge and Practices of Endotracheal Suctioning amongst Nursing Professionals: A Systematic Review
title_sort knowledge and practices of endotracheal suctioning amongst nursing professionals: a systematic review
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7050166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32148345
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23326
work_keys_str_mv AT pintohalitaj knowledgeandpracticesofendotrachealsuctioningamongstnursingprofessionalsasystematicreview
AT dsilvafatima knowledgeandpracticesofendotrachealsuctioningamongstnursingprofessionalsasystematicreview
AT sanilthankappans knowledgeandpracticesofendotrachealsuctioningamongstnursingprofessionalsasystematicreview