Cargando…

Assessing Hidden Hearing Loss After Impulse Noise in a Mouse Model

INTRODUCTION: There are several key differences between impulse and continuous noise: the nature of the noise itself, the cochlear and neuronal structures affected, the severity to which they damage the auditory system, and the period of time in which damage occurs. Notably, no work on hidden hearin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harrison, Ryan T., Bielefeld, Eric C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7050230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32098929
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/nah.NAH_38_18
_version_ 1783502591855951872
author Harrison, Ryan T.
Bielefeld, Eric C.
author_facet Harrison, Ryan T.
Bielefeld, Eric C.
author_sort Harrison, Ryan T.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There are several key differences between impulse and continuous noise: the nature of the noise itself, the cochlear and neuronal structures affected, the severity to which they damage the auditory system, and the period of time in which damage occurs. Notably, no work on hidden hearing loss after impulse noise exposure has been done to this point, though it has been extensively studied after continuous noise. Hidden hearing loss manifests physiologically with reductions in suprathreshold amplitudes of the first wave of the auditory brainstem response, while auditory thresholds can remain relatively normal. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the extent to which, if at all, hidden hearing loss is present after exposure to impulse noise in C57BL6/J mice. METHODS: Thirty-one C57BL6/J mice were used in the experiment, in accordance with IACUC protocols. Auditory brainstem responses were recorded before and after noise exposures. The noise exposures consisted of 500 impulses at 137 dB peSPL. RESULTS: Suprathreshold amplitude reductions in the P1 wave of the mouse auditory brainstem response were seen, but only at frequencies with significant threshold shift. CONCLUSION: These amplitude changes were consistent with hidden hearing loss, and we conclude that impulse noise can cause hidden hearing loss, but future studies are required to determine the specific mechanisms involved and if they parallel those of hidden hearing loss after continuous noise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7050230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70502302020-03-13 Assessing Hidden Hearing Loss After Impulse Noise in a Mouse Model Harrison, Ryan T. Bielefeld, Eric C. Noise Health Original Article INTRODUCTION: There are several key differences between impulse and continuous noise: the nature of the noise itself, the cochlear and neuronal structures affected, the severity to which they damage the auditory system, and the period of time in which damage occurs. Notably, no work on hidden hearing loss after impulse noise exposure has been done to this point, though it has been extensively studied after continuous noise. Hidden hearing loss manifests physiologically with reductions in suprathreshold amplitudes of the first wave of the auditory brainstem response, while auditory thresholds can remain relatively normal. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the extent to which, if at all, hidden hearing loss is present after exposure to impulse noise in C57BL6/J mice. METHODS: Thirty-one C57BL6/J mice were used in the experiment, in accordance with IACUC protocols. Auditory brainstem responses were recorded before and after noise exposures. The noise exposures consisted of 500 impulses at 137 dB peSPL. RESULTS: Suprathreshold amplitude reductions in the P1 wave of the mouse auditory brainstem response were seen, but only at frequencies with significant threshold shift. CONCLUSION: These amplitude changes were consistent with hidden hearing loss, and we conclude that impulse noise can cause hidden hearing loss, but future studies are required to determine the specific mechanisms involved and if they parallel those of hidden hearing loss after continuous noise. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 2020-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7050230/ /pubmed/32098929 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/nah.NAH_38_18 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Noise & Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Harrison, Ryan T.
Bielefeld, Eric C.
Assessing Hidden Hearing Loss After Impulse Noise in a Mouse Model
title Assessing Hidden Hearing Loss After Impulse Noise in a Mouse Model
title_full Assessing Hidden Hearing Loss After Impulse Noise in a Mouse Model
title_fullStr Assessing Hidden Hearing Loss After Impulse Noise in a Mouse Model
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Hidden Hearing Loss After Impulse Noise in a Mouse Model
title_short Assessing Hidden Hearing Loss After Impulse Noise in a Mouse Model
title_sort assessing hidden hearing loss after impulse noise in a mouse model
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7050230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32098929
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/nah.NAH_38_18
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisonryant assessinghiddenhearinglossafterimpulsenoiseinamousemodel
AT bielefeldericc assessinghiddenhearinglossafterimpulsenoiseinamousemodel