Cargando…

Assessment of signal quality measured with a smart 12‐lead ECG acquisition T‐shirt

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory ECG monitoring is typically achieved using portable devices with limited number of surface leads, autonomy, and length of recording. Smart garments with multiple conductive textile electrodes provide great promise to perform continuous and comfortable ECG monitoring. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fouassier, David, Roy, Xavier, Blanchard, Anne, Hulot, Jean‐Sébastien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7050501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31339208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.12682
_version_ 1783502621390143488
author Fouassier, David
Roy, Xavier
Blanchard, Anne
Hulot, Jean‐Sébastien
author_facet Fouassier, David
Roy, Xavier
Blanchard, Anne
Hulot, Jean‐Sébastien
author_sort Fouassier, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ambulatory ECG monitoring is typically achieved using portable devices with limited number of surface leads, autonomy, and length of recording. Smart garments with multiple conductive textile electrodes provide great promise to perform continuous and comfortable ECG monitoring. METHODS: We evaluated the ECG signal quality measured on healthy subjects with a smart 12‐lead ECG acquisition T‐shirt or a 12‐lead Holter recording. ECG signals were recorded during 3 min with both techniques in three resting positions (supine, seated, standing) and while walking. Three readers independently assessed ECG patterns and evaluated the denoising of the isoelectric line, the distinction of p waves, R peaks and RR intervals, and the possible appreciation of cardiac rhythm in at least 3 leads. RESULTS: Thirty healthy subjects (70% males, 29.5 ± 7.8 years) were enrolled in the study. For all three resting conditions, cardiac rhythm was appreciated in 100% of recordings with distinction of p waves, R peaks, and isoelectric line in >97% of recordings. Appreciation of cardiac rhythm was lower in the walking conditions with both techniques (53.3% vs. 46.7%, Holter vs. smart T‐shirt, p = .60) mainly due to difficulties to distinguish p waves. These results were consistent across both genders. All ECG parameters (heart rate, PR, QRS and QTC intervals) were comparable between both techniques. No skin irritation was seen with the textile electrodes. CONCLUSIONS: A smart T‐shirt with 13 textiles electrodes allows short‐duration 12‐lead ECG acquisition with quality levels comparable to Holter recordings. The novel device should now be evaluated for long‐term non‐invasive ECG monitoring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7050501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70505012020-03-09 Assessment of signal quality measured with a smart 12‐lead ECG acquisition T‐shirt Fouassier, David Roy, Xavier Blanchard, Anne Hulot, Jean‐Sébastien Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol New Technologies BACKGROUND: Ambulatory ECG monitoring is typically achieved using portable devices with limited number of surface leads, autonomy, and length of recording. Smart garments with multiple conductive textile electrodes provide great promise to perform continuous and comfortable ECG monitoring. METHODS: We evaluated the ECG signal quality measured on healthy subjects with a smart 12‐lead ECG acquisition T‐shirt or a 12‐lead Holter recording. ECG signals were recorded during 3 min with both techniques in three resting positions (supine, seated, standing) and while walking. Three readers independently assessed ECG patterns and evaluated the denoising of the isoelectric line, the distinction of p waves, R peaks and RR intervals, and the possible appreciation of cardiac rhythm in at least 3 leads. RESULTS: Thirty healthy subjects (70% males, 29.5 ± 7.8 years) were enrolled in the study. For all three resting conditions, cardiac rhythm was appreciated in 100% of recordings with distinction of p waves, R peaks, and isoelectric line in >97% of recordings. Appreciation of cardiac rhythm was lower in the walking conditions with both techniques (53.3% vs. 46.7%, Holter vs. smart T‐shirt, p = .60) mainly due to difficulties to distinguish p waves. These results were consistent across both genders. All ECG parameters (heart rate, PR, QRS and QTC intervals) were comparable between both techniques. No skin irritation was seen with the textile electrodes. CONCLUSIONS: A smart T‐shirt with 13 textiles electrodes allows short‐duration 12‐lead ECG acquisition with quality levels comparable to Holter recordings. The novel device should now be evaluated for long‐term non‐invasive ECG monitoring. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7050501/ /pubmed/31339208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.12682 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle New Technologies
Fouassier, David
Roy, Xavier
Blanchard, Anne
Hulot, Jean‐Sébastien
Assessment of signal quality measured with a smart 12‐lead ECG acquisition T‐shirt
title Assessment of signal quality measured with a smart 12‐lead ECG acquisition T‐shirt
title_full Assessment of signal quality measured with a smart 12‐lead ECG acquisition T‐shirt
title_fullStr Assessment of signal quality measured with a smart 12‐lead ECG acquisition T‐shirt
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of signal quality measured with a smart 12‐lead ECG acquisition T‐shirt
title_short Assessment of signal quality measured with a smart 12‐lead ECG acquisition T‐shirt
title_sort assessment of signal quality measured with a smart 12‐lead ecg acquisition t‐shirt
topic New Technologies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7050501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31339208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.12682
work_keys_str_mv AT fouassierdavid assessmentofsignalqualitymeasuredwithasmart12leadecgacquisitiontshirt
AT royxavier assessmentofsignalqualitymeasuredwithasmart12leadecgacquisitiontshirt
AT blanchardanne assessmentofsignalqualitymeasuredwithasmart12leadecgacquisitiontshirt
AT hulotjeansebastien assessmentofsignalqualitymeasuredwithasmart12leadecgacquisitiontshirt