Cargando…
Assessment of signal quality measured with a smart 12‐lead ECG acquisition T‐shirt
BACKGROUND: Ambulatory ECG monitoring is typically achieved using portable devices with limited number of surface leads, autonomy, and length of recording. Smart garments with multiple conductive textile electrodes provide great promise to perform continuous and comfortable ECG monitoring. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7050501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31339208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.12682 |
_version_ | 1783502621390143488 |
---|---|
author | Fouassier, David Roy, Xavier Blanchard, Anne Hulot, Jean‐Sébastien |
author_facet | Fouassier, David Roy, Xavier Blanchard, Anne Hulot, Jean‐Sébastien |
author_sort | Fouassier, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ambulatory ECG monitoring is typically achieved using portable devices with limited number of surface leads, autonomy, and length of recording. Smart garments with multiple conductive textile electrodes provide great promise to perform continuous and comfortable ECG monitoring. METHODS: We evaluated the ECG signal quality measured on healthy subjects with a smart 12‐lead ECG acquisition T‐shirt or a 12‐lead Holter recording. ECG signals were recorded during 3 min with both techniques in three resting positions (supine, seated, standing) and while walking. Three readers independently assessed ECG patterns and evaluated the denoising of the isoelectric line, the distinction of p waves, R peaks and RR intervals, and the possible appreciation of cardiac rhythm in at least 3 leads. RESULTS: Thirty healthy subjects (70% males, 29.5 ± 7.8 years) were enrolled in the study. For all three resting conditions, cardiac rhythm was appreciated in 100% of recordings with distinction of p waves, R peaks, and isoelectric line in >97% of recordings. Appreciation of cardiac rhythm was lower in the walking conditions with both techniques (53.3% vs. 46.7%, Holter vs. smart T‐shirt, p = .60) mainly due to difficulties to distinguish p waves. These results were consistent across both genders. All ECG parameters (heart rate, PR, QRS and QTC intervals) were comparable between both techniques. No skin irritation was seen with the textile electrodes. CONCLUSIONS: A smart T‐shirt with 13 textiles electrodes allows short‐duration 12‐lead ECG acquisition with quality levels comparable to Holter recordings. The novel device should now be evaluated for long‐term non‐invasive ECG monitoring. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7050501 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70505012020-03-09 Assessment of signal quality measured with a smart 12‐lead ECG acquisition T‐shirt Fouassier, David Roy, Xavier Blanchard, Anne Hulot, Jean‐Sébastien Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol New Technologies BACKGROUND: Ambulatory ECG monitoring is typically achieved using portable devices with limited number of surface leads, autonomy, and length of recording. Smart garments with multiple conductive textile electrodes provide great promise to perform continuous and comfortable ECG monitoring. METHODS: We evaluated the ECG signal quality measured on healthy subjects with a smart 12‐lead ECG acquisition T‐shirt or a 12‐lead Holter recording. ECG signals were recorded during 3 min with both techniques in three resting positions (supine, seated, standing) and while walking. Three readers independently assessed ECG patterns and evaluated the denoising of the isoelectric line, the distinction of p waves, R peaks and RR intervals, and the possible appreciation of cardiac rhythm in at least 3 leads. RESULTS: Thirty healthy subjects (70% males, 29.5 ± 7.8 years) were enrolled in the study. For all three resting conditions, cardiac rhythm was appreciated in 100% of recordings with distinction of p waves, R peaks, and isoelectric line in >97% of recordings. Appreciation of cardiac rhythm was lower in the walking conditions with both techniques (53.3% vs. 46.7%, Holter vs. smart T‐shirt, p = .60) mainly due to difficulties to distinguish p waves. These results were consistent across both genders. All ECG parameters (heart rate, PR, QRS and QTC intervals) were comparable between both techniques. No skin irritation was seen with the textile electrodes. CONCLUSIONS: A smart T‐shirt with 13 textiles electrodes allows short‐duration 12‐lead ECG acquisition with quality levels comparable to Holter recordings. The novel device should now be evaluated for long‐term non‐invasive ECG monitoring. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7050501/ /pubmed/31339208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.12682 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | New Technologies Fouassier, David Roy, Xavier Blanchard, Anne Hulot, Jean‐Sébastien Assessment of signal quality measured with a smart 12‐lead ECG acquisition T‐shirt |
title | Assessment of signal quality measured with a smart 12‐lead ECG acquisition T‐shirt |
title_full | Assessment of signal quality measured with a smart 12‐lead ECG acquisition T‐shirt |
title_fullStr | Assessment of signal quality measured with a smart 12‐lead ECG acquisition T‐shirt |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of signal quality measured with a smart 12‐lead ECG acquisition T‐shirt |
title_short | Assessment of signal quality measured with a smart 12‐lead ECG acquisition T‐shirt |
title_sort | assessment of signal quality measured with a smart 12‐lead ecg acquisition t‐shirt |
topic | New Technologies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7050501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31339208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.12682 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fouassierdavid assessmentofsignalqualitymeasuredwithasmart12leadecgacquisitiontshirt AT royxavier assessmentofsignalqualitymeasuredwithasmart12leadecgacquisitiontshirt AT blanchardanne assessmentofsignalqualitymeasuredwithasmart12leadecgacquisitiontshirt AT hulotjeansebastien assessmentofsignalqualitymeasuredwithasmart12leadecgacquisitiontshirt |