Cargando…

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of an Instrument Assessing Barriers to Growth Hormone Treatment (BAR-GHT)

Purpose: This paper presents development and validation of a new patient reported outcome measure (PRO), the Barriers to Growth Hormone Therapy (BAR-GHT) in a patient (child/adolescent) and a parent version. The BAR-GHT was developed to measure problems and potential barriers to GHT. Methods: The de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Zwaan, Martina, Fischer-Jacobs, Josefine, Wabitsch, Martin, Reinehr, Thomas, Meckes-Ferber, Stefanie, Crosby, Ross D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7051941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32158432
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00084
_version_ 1783502763777327104
author de Zwaan, Martina
Fischer-Jacobs, Josefine
Wabitsch, Martin
Reinehr, Thomas
Meckes-Ferber, Stefanie
Crosby, Ross D.
author_facet de Zwaan, Martina
Fischer-Jacobs, Josefine
Wabitsch, Martin
Reinehr, Thomas
Meckes-Ferber, Stefanie
Crosby, Ross D.
author_sort de Zwaan, Martina
collection PubMed
description Purpose: This paper presents development and validation of a new patient reported outcome measure (PRO), the Barriers to Growth Hormone Therapy (BAR-GHT) in a patient (child/adolescent) and a parent version. The BAR-GHT was developed to measure problems and potential barriers to GHT. Methods: The development and validation of the BAR-GHT was conducted according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidance on the development of PROs. Concept elicitation included a literature review and open-ended interviews with young patients, parents, and clinical experts. Qualitative data were analyzed based on grounded theory principles and draft items were rated in terms of their importance and clarity. The instruments underwent psychometric validation in a German clinic-based patient population of children and adolescents who inject themselves and in a parent sample who inject their child. The statistical analysis plan included exploratory factor analysis, reliability, and validity. Results: 29 patients, 22 parents, and 4 clinical experts participated in the concept elicitation, 156 children and adolescents aged 8–18 years and 146 parents completed the validation study. Exploratory factor analysis resulted in six domains: Fear, Public Embarrassment, Annoyance, Daily Routine, Supplies, and Travel. Internal consistencies and test-retest reliabilities of the total score of both the patient version and the parent version were >0.8. Convergent and discriminant validity was demonstrated. Conclusions: The final 19-item BAR-GHT for patients aged 8–18 years and the 16-item version for parents can be considered reliable and valid PROs of barriers to GHT. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03672617. Universal Trial Number (UTN) of the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP, www.who.int): U1111-1210-1036.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7051941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70519412020-03-10 Development and Psychometric Evaluation of an Instrument Assessing Barriers to Growth Hormone Treatment (BAR-GHT) de Zwaan, Martina Fischer-Jacobs, Josefine Wabitsch, Martin Reinehr, Thomas Meckes-Ferber, Stefanie Crosby, Ross D. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology Purpose: This paper presents development and validation of a new patient reported outcome measure (PRO), the Barriers to Growth Hormone Therapy (BAR-GHT) in a patient (child/adolescent) and a parent version. The BAR-GHT was developed to measure problems and potential barriers to GHT. Methods: The development and validation of the BAR-GHT was conducted according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidance on the development of PROs. Concept elicitation included a literature review and open-ended interviews with young patients, parents, and clinical experts. Qualitative data were analyzed based on grounded theory principles and draft items were rated in terms of their importance and clarity. The instruments underwent psychometric validation in a German clinic-based patient population of children and adolescents who inject themselves and in a parent sample who inject their child. The statistical analysis plan included exploratory factor analysis, reliability, and validity. Results: 29 patients, 22 parents, and 4 clinical experts participated in the concept elicitation, 156 children and adolescents aged 8–18 years and 146 parents completed the validation study. Exploratory factor analysis resulted in six domains: Fear, Public Embarrassment, Annoyance, Daily Routine, Supplies, and Travel. Internal consistencies and test-retest reliabilities of the total score of both the patient version and the parent version were >0.8. Convergent and discriminant validity was demonstrated. Conclusions: The final 19-item BAR-GHT for patients aged 8–18 years and the 16-item version for parents can be considered reliable and valid PROs of barriers to GHT. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03672617. Universal Trial Number (UTN) of the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP, www.who.int): U1111-1210-1036. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7051941/ /pubmed/32158432 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00084 Text en Copyright © 2020 de Zwaan, Fischer-Jacobs, Wabitsch, Reinehr, Meckes-Ferber and Crosby. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
de Zwaan, Martina
Fischer-Jacobs, Josefine
Wabitsch, Martin
Reinehr, Thomas
Meckes-Ferber, Stefanie
Crosby, Ross D.
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of an Instrument Assessing Barriers to Growth Hormone Treatment (BAR-GHT)
title Development and Psychometric Evaluation of an Instrument Assessing Barriers to Growth Hormone Treatment (BAR-GHT)
title_full Development and Psychometric Evaluation of an Instrument Assessing Barriers to Growth Hormone Treatment (BAR-GHT)
title_fullStr Development and Psychometric Evaluation of an Instrument Assessing Barriers to Growth Hormone Treatment (BAR-GHT)
title_full_unstemmed Development and Psychometric Evaluation of an Instrument Assessing Barriers to Growth Hormone Treatment (BAR-GHT)
title_short Development and Psychometric Evaluation of an Instrument Assessing Barriers to Growth Hormone Treatment (BAR-GHT)
title_sort development and psychometric evaluation of an instrument assessing barriers to growth hormone treatment (bar-ght)
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7051941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32158432
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00084
work_keys_str_mv AT dezwaanmartina developmentandpsychometricevaluationofaninstrumentassessingbarrierstogrowthhormonetreatmentbarght
AT fischerjacobsjosefine developmentandpsychometricevaluationofaninstrumentassessingbarrierstogrowthhormonetreatmentbarght
AT wabitschmartin developmentandpsychometricevaluationofaninstrumentassessingbarrierstogrowthhormonetreatmentbarght
AT reinehrthomas developmentandpsychometricevaluationofaninstrumentassessingbarrierstogrowthhormonetreatmentbarght
AT meckesferberstefanie developmentandpsychometricevaluationofaninstrumentassessingbarrierstogrowthhormonetreatmentbarght
AT crosbyrossd developmentandpsychometricevaluationofaninstrumentassessingbarrierstogrowthhormonetreatmentbarght