Cargando…
A Meta-Analytic Review of the Value of miRNA for Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis
Backgrounds and Purpose: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. The etiology of MS is unclear, disease diagnosis mainly based on symptoms, and lacks effective laboratory test index. Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) as sen...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7052186/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32158427 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00132 |
_version_ | 1783502816077152256 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Zongpu Xiong, Huihui Xie, Fukang Wu, Zhongdao Feng, Ying |
author_facet | Zhou, Zongpu Xiong, Huihui Xie, Fukang Wu, Zhongdao Feng, Ying |
author_sort | Zhou, Zongpu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Backgrounds and Purpose: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. The etiology of MS is unclear, disease diagnosis mainly based on symptoms, and lacks effective laboratory test index. Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) as sensitive biomarkers have been widely studied, the expression levels of certain miRNAs are dynamically changed in MS patients. This meta-analysis aims to assess the overall diagnostic accuracy of circulating miRNAs for MS. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI databases as of July 20, 2019. QUADAS was used to assess the quality of included studies. All studies were processed by Stata 15.0 software. Eleven articles with 600 patients with MS and 389 controls were included. Results: The sensitivity and specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR of the overall studies were 0.81 (95% CI 0.77–0.84), 0.75 (95% CI 0.68–0.81), 3.3 (95% CI 2.5–4.3), 0.25 (95% CI 0.20–0.32), 13 (95% CI: 8–20), and 0.85 (95% CI 0.82–0.88). Subgroup analysis indicated that miRNA assay had higher diagnostic accuracy for relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) when compared with other MS subtypes. Conclusion: Our study performed a meta-analysis to generate an estimate of the relevance of miRNA change and the occurrence of MS, and revealed circulating miRNAs has the potential to be used for MS diagnosis, especially for RRMS. Future studies should clarify to which specific miRNAs can accurately diagnose disease subtypes. The miRNA-related pathogenesis may provide theoretical basis for drug development for early intervention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7052186 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70521862020-03-10 A Meta-Analytic Review of the Value of miRNA for Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis Zhou, Zongpu Xiong, Huihui Xie, Fukang Wu, Zhongdao Feng, Ying Front Neurol Neurology Backgrounds and Purpose: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. The etiology of MS is unclear, disease diagnosis mainly based on symptoms, and lacks effective laboratory test index. Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) as sensitive biomarkers have been widely studied, the expression levels of certain miRNAs are dynamically changed in MS patients. This meta-analysis aims to assess the overall diagnostic accuracy of circulating miRNAs for MS. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI databases as of July 20, 2019. QUADAS was used to assess the quality of included studies. All studies were processed by Stata 15.0 software. Eleven articles with 600 patients with MS and 389 controls were included. Results: The sensitivity and specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR of the overall studies were 0.81 (95% CI 0.77–0.84), 0.75 (95% CI 0.68–0.81), 3.3 (95% CI 2.5–4.3), 0.25 (95% CI 0.20–0.32), 13 (95% CI: 8–20), and 0.85 (95% CI 0.82–0.88). Subgroup analysis indicated that miRNA assay had higher diagnostic accuracy for relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) when compared with other MS subtypes. Conclusion: Our study performed a meta-analysis to generate an estimate of the relevance of miRNA change and the occurrence of MS, and revealed circulating miRNAs has the potential to be used for MS diagnosis, especially for RRMS. Future studies should clarify to which specific miRNAs can accurately diagnose disease subtypes. The miRNA-related pathogenesis may provide theoretical basis for drug development for early intervention. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7052186/ /pubmed/32158427 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00132 Text en Copyright © 2020 Zhou, Xiong, Xie, Wu and Feng. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Zhou, Zongpu Xiong, Huihui Xie, Fukang Wu, Zhongdao Feng, Ying A Meta-Analytic Review of the Value of miRNA for Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis |
title | A Meta-Analytic Review of the Value of miRNA for Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis |
title_full | A Meta-Analytic Review of the Value of miRNA for Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis |
title_fullStr | A Meta-Analytic Review of the Value of miRNA for Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis |
title_full_unstemmed | A Meta-Analytic Review of the Value of miRNA for Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis |
title_short | A Meta-Analytic Review of the Value of miRNA for Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis |
title_sort | meta-analytic review of the value of mirna for multiple sclerosis diagnosis |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7052186/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32158427 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00132 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhouzongpu ametaanalyticreviewofthevalueofmirnaformultiplesclerosisdiagnosis AT xionghuihui ametaanalyticreviewofthevalueofmirnaformultiplesclerosisdiagnosis AT xiefukang ametaanalyticreviewofthevalueofmirnaformultiplesclerosisdiagnosis AT wuzhongdao ametaanalyticreviewofthevalueofmirnaformultiplesclerosisdiagnosis AT fengying ametaanalyticreviewofthevalueofmirnaformultiplesclerosisdiagnosis AT zhouzongpu metaanalyticreviewofthevalueofmirnaformultiplesclerosisdiagnosis AT xionghuihui metaanalyticreviewofthevalueofmirnaformultiplesclerosisdiagnosis AT xiefukang metaanalyticreviewofthevalueofmirnaformultiplesclerosisdiagnosis AT wuzhongdao metaanalyticreviewofthevalueofmirnaformultiplesclerosisdiagnosis AT fengying metaanalyticreviewofthevalueofmirnaformultiplesclerosisdiagnosis |