Cargando…

Outcomes After Latarjet Procedure: Patients With First-Time Versus Recurrent Dislocations

BACKGROUND: The preoperative number of dislocations has been previously proved to be a major factor influencing the results after Bankart repair with more preoperative dislocations correlated with higher recurrence rates and more reoperations. This could possibly be because of the lower quality of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hardy, Alexandre, Sabatier, Vincent, Laboudie, Pierre, Schoch, Bradley, Nourissat, Geoffroy, Valenti, Philippe, Kany, Jean, Deranlot, Julien, Solignac, Nicolas, Hardy, Philippe, Vigan, Marie, Werthel, Jean-David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7052409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31647689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363546519879929
_version_ 1783502866490589184
author Hardy, Alexandre
Sabatier, Vincent
Laboudie, Pierre
Schoch, Bradley
Nourissat, Geoffroy
Valenti, Philippe
Kany, Jean
Deranlot, Julien
Solignac, Nicolas
Hardy, Philippe
Vigan, Marie
Werthel, Jean-David
author_facet Hardy, Alexandre
Sabatier, Vincent
Laboudie, Pierre
Schoch, Bradley
Nourissat, Geoffroy
Valenti, Philippe
Kany, Jean
Deranlot, Julien
Solignac, Nicolas
Hardy, Philippe
Vigan, Marie
Werthel, Jean-David
author_sort Hardy, Alexandre
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The preoperative number of dislocations has been previously proved to be a major factor influencing the results after Bankart repair with more preoperative dislocations correlated with higher recurrence rates and more reoperations. This could possibly be because of the lower quality of the tissue repaired during the procedure after multiple dislocations. On the other hand, the Latarjet procedure does not “repair” but rather reconstructs and augments the anterior glenoid. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The main objective was to report the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing a Latarjet procedure after 1 dislocation versus multiple (≥2) dislocations. The hypothesis was that the preoperative number of dislocations would not influence clinical results. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients older than 18 years who had undergone a primary Latarjet procedure for shoulder instability with at least 2 years of follow-up were included. Three different techniques were used: a mini-open technique using 2 screws, an arthroscopic technique using 2 screws, and an arthroscopic technique using 2 cortical buttons. Patients were evaluated and answered a questionnaire to assess the number of episodes of dislocation before surgery, the time between the first dislocation and surgery, recurrence of the dislocation, revision surgery, the Walch-Duplay score, the Simple Shoulder Test score, and the visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain. RESULTS: A total of 308 patients were included for analysis with a mean follow-up of 3.4 ± 0.8 years. Of that, 83 patients were included in the first-time dislocation group and 225 in the recurrent dislocation group. At last follow-up, the rates of recurrence and reoperation were not significantly different between groups: 4.8% in the first-time dislocation group versus 3.65% in the recurrent dislocation group and 6.1% versus 4.0%, respectively. The overall Walch-Duplay scores at last follow-up were also comparable between the 2 groups, 67.3 ± 24.85 and 71.8 ± 25.1, even though the first-time dislocation group showed a lower pain subscore (15.0 ± 8.6 vs 18.0 ± 7.5; P = .003). The VAS for pain was also significantly higher in the first-time dislocation group compared with the recurrent dislocation group (1.8 ± 2.3 vs 1.2 ± 1.7; P = .03). CONCLUSION: The number of episodes of dislocation before surgery does not affect postoperative instability rates and reoperation rates after the Latarjet procedure. However, patients with first-time dislocations had more postoperative pain compared with patients with recurrent dislocations before surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7052409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70524092020-03-17 Outcomes After Latarjet Procedure: Patients With First-Time Versus Recurrent Dislocations Hardy, Alexandre Sabatier, Vincent Laboudie, Pierre Schoch, Bradley Nourissat, Geoffroy Valenti, Philippe Kany, Jean Deranlot, Julien Solignac, Nicolas Hardy, Philippe Vigan, Marie Werthel, Jean-David Am J Sports Med Articles BACKGROUND: The preoperative number of dislocations has been previously proved to be a major factor influencing the results after Bankart repair with more preoperative dislocations correlated with higher recurrence rates and more reoperations. This could possibly be because of the lower quality of the tissue repaired during the procedure after multiple dislocations. On the other hand, the Latarjet procedure does not “repair” but rather reconstructs and augments the anterior glenoid. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The main objective was to report the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing a Latarjet procedure after 1 dislocation versus multiple (≥2) dislocations. The hypothesis was that the preoperative number of dislocations would not influence clinical results. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients older than 18 years who had undergone a primary Latarjet procedure for shoulder instability with at least 2 years of follow-up were included. Three different techniques were used: a mini-open technique using 2 screws, an arthroscopic technique using 2 screws, and an arthroscopic technique using 2 cortical buttons. Patients were evaluated and answered a questionnaire to assess the number of episodes of dislocation before surgery, the time between the first dislocation and surgery, recurrence of the dislocation, revision surgery, the Walch-Duplay score, the Simple Shoulder Test score, and the visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain. RESULTS: A total of 308 patients were included for analysis with a mean follow-up of 3.4 ± 0.8 years. Of that, 83 patients were included in the first-time dislocation group and 225 in the recurrent dislocation group. At last follow-up, the rates of recurrence and reoperation were not significantly different between groups: 4.8% in the first-time dislocation group versus 3.65% in the recurrent dislocation group and 6.1% versus 4.0%, respectively. The overall Walch-Duplay scores at last follow-up were also comparable between the 2 groups, 67.3 ± 24.85 and 71.8 ± 25.1, even though the first-time dislocation group showed a lower pain subscore (15.0 ± 8.6 vs 18.0 ± 7.5; P = .003). The VAS for pain was also significantly higher in the first-time dislocation group compared with the recurrent dislocation group (1.8 ± 2.3 vs 1.2 ± 1.7; P = .03). CONCLUSION: The number of episodes of dislocation before surgery does not affect postoperative instability rates and reoperation rates after the Latarjet procedure. However, patients with first-time dislocations had more postoperative pain compared with patients with recurrent dislocations before surgery. SAGE Publications 2019-10-24 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7052409/ /pubmed/31647689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363546519879929 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Hardy, Alexandre
Sabatier, Vincent
Laboudie, Pierre
Schoch, Bradley
Nourissat, Geoffroy
Valenti, Philippe
Kany, Jean
Deranlot, Julien
Solignac, Nicolas
Hardy, Philippe
Vigan, Marie
Werthel, Jean-David
Outcomes After Latarjet Procedure: Patients With First-Time Versus Recurrent Dislocations
title Outcomes After Latarjet Procedure: Patients With First-Time Versus Recurrent Dislocations
title_full Outcomes After Latarjet Procedure: Patients With First-Time Versus Recurrent Dislocations
title_fullStr Outcomes After Latarjet Procedure: Patients With First-Time Versus Recurrent Dislocations
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes After Latarjet Procedure: Patients With First-Time Versus Recurrent Dislocations
title_short Outcomes After Latarjet Procedure: Patients With First-Time Versus Recurrent Dislocations
title_sort outcomes after latarjet procedure: patients with first-time versus recurrent dislocations
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7052409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31647689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363546519879929
work_keys_str_mv AT hardyalexandre outcomesafterlatarjetprocedurepatientswithfirsttimeversusrecurrentdislocations
AT sabatiervincent outcomesafterlatarjetprocedurepatientswithfirsttimeversusrecurrentdislocations
AT laboudiepierre outcomesafterlatarjetprocedurepatientswithfirsttimeversusrecurrentdislocations
AT schochbradley outcomesafterlatarjetprocedurepatientswithfirsttimeversusrecurrentdislocations
AT nourissatgeoffroy outcomesafterlatarjetprocedurepatientswithfirsttimeversusrecurrentdislocations
AT valentiphilippe outcomesafterlatarjetprocedurepatientswithfirsttimeversusrecurrentdislocations
AT kanyjean outcomesafterlatarjetprocedurepatientswithfirsttimeversusrecurrentdislocations
AT deranlotjulien outcomesafterlatarjetprocedurepatientswithfirsttimeversusrecurrentdislocations
AT solignacnicolas outcomesafterlatarjetprocedurepatientswithfirsttimeversusrecurrentdislocations
AT hardyphilippe outcomesafterlatarjetprocedurepatientswithfirsttimeversusrecurrentdislocations
AT viganmarie outcomesafterlatarjetprocedurepatientswithfirsttimeversusrecurrentdislocations
AT wertheljeandavid outcomesafterlatarjetprocedurepatientswithfirsttimeversusrecurrentdislocations