Cargando…
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs upfront surgery for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: A retrospective, propensity score-matched study
BACKGROUND: The benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach is controversial. AIM: To evaluate the perioperative and long-term outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma. METHODS: This retrospective...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7052534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32148379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i8.818 |
_version_ | 1783502895733276672 |
---|---|
author | Li, Yang Ma, Fu-Hai Xue, Li-Yan Tian, Yan-Tao |
author_facet | Li, Yang Ma, Fu-Hai Xue, Li-Yan Tian, Yan-Tao |
author_sort | Li, Yang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach is controversial. AIM: To evaluate the perioperative and long-term outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma. METHODS: This retrospective study identified patients with locally advanced signet-ring cell carcinomas of the stomach (cT3/4 and cN any) diagnosed from January 2012 to December 2017 by using the clinical Tumor-Node-Metastasis (cTNM) staging system. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce bias in patient selection. The histologic and prognostic effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were assessed. The overall survival rates were used as the outcome measure to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs surgery-first treatment in the selected patients. RESULTS: Of the 144 patients eligible for this study, 36 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 108 received initial surgery after diagnosis. After adjustment by PSM, 36 pairs of patients were generated, and baseline characteristics, including age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, tumor location, and cTNM stage, were similar between the two groups. The R0 resection rates were 88.9% and 86.1% in the surgery-first and neoadjuvant chemotherapy groups after PSM, respectively (P = 1.000). The median follow-up period was 46.4 mo. The 5-year overall survival rates of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and surgery-first group were 50.0% and 65.0% (P = 0.235), respectively, before PSM and 50% and 64.7% (P = 0.192), respectively, after PSM. Multivariate analyses conducted before and after PSM showed that NAC was not a prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy provides no survival benefit in patients with locally advanced gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma. For resectable gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma, upfront surgery should be the primary therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7052534 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70525342020-03-06 Neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs upfront surgery for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: A retrospective, propensity score-matched study Li, Yang Ma, Fu-Hai Xue, Li-Yan Tian, Yan-Tao World J Gastroenterol Retrospective Study BACKGROUND: The benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach is controversial. AIM: To evaluate the perioperative and long-term outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma. METHODS: This retrospective study identified patients with locally advanced signet-ring cell carcinomas of the stomach (cT3/4 and cN any) diagnosed from January 2012 to December 2017 by using the clinical Tumor-Node-Metastasis (cTNM) staging system. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce bias in patient selection. The histologic and prognostic effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were assessed. The overall survival rates were used as the outcome measure to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs surgery-first treatment in the selected patients. RESULTS: Of the 144 patients eligible for this study, 36 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 108 received initial surgery after diagnosis. After adjustment by PSM, 36 pairs of patients were generated, and baseline characteristics, including age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, tumor location, and cTNM stage, were similar between the two groups. The R0 resection rates were 88.9% and 86.1% in the surgery-first and neoadjuvant chemotherapy groups after PSM, respectively (P = 1.000). The median follow-up period was 46.4 mo. The 5-year overall survival rates of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and surgery-first group were 50.0% and 65.0% (P = 0.235), respectively, before PSM and 50% and 64.7% (P = 0.192), respectively, after PSM. Multivariate analyses conducted before and after PSM showed that NAC was not a prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy provides no survival benefit in patients with locally advanced gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma. For resectable gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma, upfront surgery should be the primary therapy. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-02-28 2020-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7052534/ /pubmed/32148379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i8.818 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Retrospective Study Li, Yang Ma, Fu-Hai Xue, Li-Yan Tian, Yan-Tao Neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs upfront surgery for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: A retrospective, propensity score-matched study |
title | Neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs upfront surgery for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: A retrospective, propensity score-matched study |
title_full | Neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs upfront surgery for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: A retrospective, propensity score-matched study |
title_fullStr | Neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs upfront surgery for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: A retrospective, propensity score-matched study |
title_full_unstemmed | Neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs upfront surgery for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: A retrospective, propensity score-matched study |
title_short | Neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs upfront surgery for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: A retrospective, propensity score-matched study |
title_sort | neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs upfront surgery for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: a retrospective, propensity score-matched study |
topic | Retrospective Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7052534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32148379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i8.818 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liyang neoadjuvantchemotherapyvsupfrontsurgeryforgastricsignetringcellcarcinomaaretrospectivepropensityscorematchedstudy AT mafuhai neoadjuvantchemotherapyvsupfrontsurgeryforgastricsignetringcellcarcinomaaretrospectivepropensityscorematchedstudy AT xueliyan neoadjuvantchemotherapyvsupfrontsurgeryforgastricsignetringcellcarcinomaaretrospectivepropensityscorematchedstudy AT tianyantao neoadjuvantchemotherapyvsupfrontsurgeryforgastricsignetringcellcarcinomaaretrospectivepropensityscorematchedstudy |