Cargando…

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs upfront surgery for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: A retrospective, propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND: The benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach is controversial. AIM: To evaluate the perioperative and long-term outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma. METHODS: This retrospective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yang, Ma, Fu-Hai, Xue, Li-Yan, Tian, Yan-Tao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7052534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32148379
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i8.818
_version_ 1783502895733276672
author Li, Yang
Ma, Fu-Hai
Xue, Li-Yan
Tian, Yan-Tao
author_facet Li, Yang
Ma, Fu-Hai
Xue, Li-Yan
Tian, Yan-Tao
author_sort Li, Yang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach is controversial. AIM: To evaluate the perioperative and long-term outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma. METHODS: This retrospective study identified patients with locally advanced signet-ring cell carcinomas of the stomach (cT3/4 and cN any) diagnosed from January 2012 to December 2017 by using the clinical Tumor-Node-Metastasis (cTNM) staging system. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce bias in patient selection. The histologic and prognostic effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were assessed. The overall survival rates were used as the outcome measure to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs surgery-first treatment in the selected patients. RESULTS: Of the 144 patients eligible for this study, 36 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 108 received initial surgery after diagnosis. After adjustment by PSM, 36 pairs of patients were generated, and baseline characteristics, including age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, tumor location, and cTNM stage, were similar between the two groups. The R0 resection rates were 88.9% and 86.1% in the surgery-first and neoadjuvant chemotherapy groups after PSM, respectively (P = 1.000). The median follow-up period was 46.4 mo. The 5-year overall survival rates of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and surgery-first group were 50.0% and 65.0% (P = 0.235), respectively, before PSM and 50% and 64.7% (P = 0.192), respectively, after PSM. Multivariate analyses conducted before and after PSM showed that NAC was not a prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy provides no survival benefit in patients with locally advanced gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma. For resectable gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma, upfront surgery should be the primary therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7052534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70525342020-03-06 Neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs upfront surgery for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: A retrospective, propensity score-matched study Li, Yang Ma, Fu-Hai Xue, Li-Yan Tian, Yan-Tao World J Gastroenterol Retrospective Study BACKGROUND: The benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach is controversial. AIM: To evaluate the perioperative and long-term outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma. METHODS: This retrospective study identified patients with locally advanced signet-ring cell carcinomas of the stomach (cT3/4 and cN any) diagnosed from January 2012 to December 2017 by using the clinical Tumor-Node-Metastasis (cTNM) staging system. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce bias in patient selection. The histologic and prognostic effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were assessed. The overall survival rates were used as the outcome measure to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs surgery-first treatment in the selected patients. RESULTS: Of the 144 patients eligible for this study, 36 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 108 received initial surgery after diagnosis. After adjustment by PSM, 36 pairs of patients were generated, and baseline characteristics, including age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, tumor location, and cTNM stage, were similar between the two groups. The R0 resection rates were 88.9% and 86.1% in the surgery-first and neoadjuvant chemotherapy groups after PSM, respectively (P = 1.000). The median follow-up period was 46.4 mo. The 5-year overall survival rates of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and surgery-first group were 50.0% and 65.0% (P = 0.235), respectively, before PSM and 50% and 64.7% (P = 0.192), respectively, after PSM. Multivariate analyses conducted before and after PSM showed that NAC was not a prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy provides no survival benefit in patients with locally advanced gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma. For resectable gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma, upfront surgery should be the primary therapy. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-02-28 2020-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7052534/ /pubmed/32148379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i8.818 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Retrospective Study
Li, Yang
Ma, Fu-Hai
Xue, Li-Yan
Tian, Yan-Tao
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs upfront surgery for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: A retrospective, propensity score-matched study
title Neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs upfront surgery for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: A retrospective, propensity score-matched study
title_full Neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs upfront surgery for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: A retrospective, propensity score-matched study
title_fullStr Neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs upfront surgery for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: A retrospective, propensity score-matched study
title_full_unstemmed Neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs upfront surgery for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: A retrospective, propensity score-matched study
title_short Neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs upfront surgery for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: A retrospective, propensity score-matched study
title_sort neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs upfront surgery for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: a retrospective, propensity score-matched study
topic Retrospective Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7052534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32148379
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i8.818
work_keys_str_mv AT liyang neoadjuvantchemotherapyvsupfrontsurgeryforgastricsignetringcellcarcinomaaretrospectivepropensityscorematchedstudy
AT mafuhai neoadjuvantchemotherapyvsupfrontsurgeryforgastricsignetringcellcarcinomaaretrospectivepropensityscorematchedstudy
AT xueliyan neoadjuvantchemotherapyvsupfrontsurgeryforgastricsignetringcellcarcinomaaretrospectivepropensityscorematchedstudy
AT tianyantao neoadjuvantchemotherapyvsupfrontsurgeryforgastricsignetringcellcarcinomaaretrospectivepropensityscorematchedstudy