Cargando…
Preoperative evaluation of residual tumor in patients with endometrial carcinoma by using (18)F-FDG PET/CT
Purpose: To evaluate the value of (18)F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for determining the presence of residual tumors after curettage in patients with endometrial cancer. Methods: Preoperative (18)F-FDG PET/CT was performed in 90 women with endometrial cancer. PET/C...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7052915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32127955 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.39423 |
Sumario: | Purpose: To evaluate the value of (18)F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for determining the presence of residual tumors after curettage in patients with endometrial cancer. Methods: Preoperative (18)F-FDG PET/CT was performed in 90 women with endometrial cancer. PET/CT parameters and clinical characteristics were compared between patients with and without residual tumors. The clinical characteristics of patients with residual tumors that showed low (18)F-FDG uptake were also analyzed. Results: Among the 90 patients, 86 had residual tumors. ROC analysis identified a lesion SUVmax value of 5.0 as the optimal cut-off value for predicting whether or not patients had a residual tumor. With the SUVmax cut-off of 5, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values for residual tumor prediction were 87.2%, 100%, 100%, and 26.7%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed significant associations between the high PET group (SUVmax > 5) and low PET group (SUVmax ≤ 5), and histologic type (P = 0.043) and tumor size (P < 0.001) in patients with residual tumors. In patients with low-grade and clear cell carcinomas and a tumor size < 1.35 cm, the probability of being in the low-PET group was 47.6%. In such patients, major parts of the residual tumors showed low (18)F-FDG uptake, similar to that in patients with no residual tumors. Conclusion: SUVmax was the lone predictive value for the presence of residual tumors after curettage in patients with endometrial cancer. Lesion SUVmax greater than 5 suggested a high possibility of residual tumors. In patients with low-grade and clear cell carcinomas with tumor size < 1.35 cm, residual tumors may present low (18)F-FDG uptake, mimicking the metabolic phenotypes of patients without residual tumors. |
---|