Cargando…
Comparison of (18)F-sodium fluoride PET/CT, (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT and diffusion-weighted MRI for the detection of bone metastases in recurrent prostate cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis in France
BACKGROUND: The diagnostic performance of (18)F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) (NaF), (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT (FCH) and diffusion-weighted whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) in detecting bone metastases in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7052960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32122345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-020-00425-y |
_version_ | 1783502952347992064 |
---|---|
author | Gauthé, Mathieu Zarca, Kevin Aveline, Cyrielle Lecouvet, Frédéric Balogova, Sona Cussenot, Olivier Talbot, Jean-Noël Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle |
author_facet | Gauthé, Mathieu Zarca, Kevin Aveline, Cyrielle Lecouvet, Frédéric Balogova, Sona Cussenot, Olivier Talbot, Jean-Noël Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle |
author_sort | Gauthé, Mathieu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The diagnostic performance of (18)F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) (NaF), (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT (FCH) and diffusion-weighted whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) in detecting bone metastases in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with first biochemical recurrence (BCR) has already been published, but their cost-effectiveness in this indication have never been compared. METHODS: We performed trial-based and model-based economic evaluations. In the trial, PCa patients with first BCR after previous definitive treatment were prospectively included. Imaging readings were performed both on-site by local specialists and centrally by experts. The economic evaluation extrapolated the diagnostic performances of the imaging techniques using a combination of a decision tree and Markov model based on the natural history of PCa. The health states were non-metastatic and metastatic BCR, non-metastatic and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and death. The state-transition probabilities and utilities associated with each health state were derived from the literature. Real costs were extracted from the National Cost Study of hospital costs and the social health insurance cost schedule. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in diagnostic performance among the 3 imaging modalities in detecting bone metastases. FCH was the most cost-effective imaging modality above a threshold incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 3000€/QALY when imaging was interpreted by local specialists and 9000€/QALY when imaging was interpreted by experts. CONCLUSIONS: FCH had a better incremental effect on QALY, independent of imaging reading and should be preferred for detecting bone metastases in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01501630. Registered 29 December 2011. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7052960 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70529602020-03-11 Comparison of (18)F-sodium fluoride PET/CT, (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT and diffusion-weighted MRI for the detection of bone metastases in recurrent prostate cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis in France Gauthé, Mathieu Zarca, Kevin Aveline, Cyrielle Lecouvet, Frédéric Balogova, Sona Cussenot, Olivier Talbot, Jean-Noël Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle BMC Med Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: The diagnostic performance of (18)F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) (NaF), (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT (FCH) and diffusion-weighted whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) in detecting bone metastases in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with first biochemical recurrence (BCR) has already been published, but their cost-effectiveness in this indication have never been compared. METHODS: We performed trial-based and model-based economic evaluations. In the trial, PCa patients with first BCR after previous definitive treatment were prospectively included. Imaging readings were performed both on-site by local specialists and centrally by experts. The economic evaluation extrapolated the diagnostic performances of the imaging techniques using a combination of a decision tree and Markov model based on the natural history of PCa. The health states were non-metastatic and metastatic BCR, non-metastatic and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and death. The state-transition probabilities and utilities associated with each health state were derived from the literature. Real costs were extracted from the National Cost Study of hospital costs and the social health insurance cost schedule. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in diagnostic performance among the 3 imaging modalities in detecting bone metastases. FCH was the most cost-effective imaging modality above a threshold incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 3000€/QALY when imaging was interpreted by local specialists and 9000€/QALY when imaging was interpreted by experts. CONCLUSIONS: FCH had a better incremental effect on QALY, independent of imaging reading and should be preferred for detecting bone metastases in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01501630. Registered 29 December 2011. BioMed Central 2020-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7052960/ /pubmed/32122345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-020-00425-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gauthé, Mathieu Zarca, Kevin Aveline, Cyrielle Lecouvet, Frédéric Balogova, Sona Cussenot, Olivier Talbot, Jean-Noël Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle Comparison of (18)F-sodium fluoride PET/CT, (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT and diffusion-weighted MRI for the detection of bone metastases in recurrent prostate cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis in France |
title | Comparison of (18)F-sodium fluoride PET/CT, (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT and diffusion-weighted MRI for the detection of bone metastases in recurrent prostate cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis in France |
title_full | Comparison of (18)F-sodium fluoride PET/CT, (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT and diffusion-weighted MRI for the detection of bone metastases in recurrent prostate cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis in France |
title_fullStr | Comparison of (18)F-sodium fluoride PET/CT, (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT and diffusion-weighted MRI for the detection of bone metastases in recurrent prostate cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis in France |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of (18)F-sodium fluoride PET/CT, (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT and diffusion-weighted MRI for the detection of bone metastases in recurrent prostate cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis in France |
title_short | Comparison of (18)F-sodium fluoride PET/CT, (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT and diffusion-weighted MRI for the detection of bone metastases in recurrent prostate cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis in France |
title_sort | comparison of (18)f-sodium fluoride pet/ct, (18)f-fluorocholine pet/ct and diffusion-weighted mri for the detection of bone metastases in recurrent prostate cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis in france |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7052960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32122345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-020-00425-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gauthemathieu comparisonof18fsodiumfluoridepetct18ffluorocholinepetctanddiffusionweightedmriforthedetectionofbonemetastasesinrecurrentprostatecanceracosteffectivenessanalysisinfrance AT zarcakevin comparisonof18fsodiumfluoridepetct18ffluorocholinepetctanddiffusionweightedmriforthedetectionofbonemetastasesinrecurrentprostatecanceracosteffectivenessanalysisinfrance AT avelinecyrielle comparisonof18fsodiumfluoridepetct18ffluorocholinepetctanddiffusionweightedmriforthedetectionofbonemetastasesinrecurrentprostatecanceracosteffectivenessanalysisinfrance AT lecouvetfrederic comparisonof18fsodiumfluoridepetct18ffluorocholinepetctanddiffusionweightedmriforthedetectionofbonemetastasesinrecurrentprostatecanceracosteffectivenessanalysisinfrance AT balogovasona comparisonof18fsodiumfluoridepetct18ffluorocholinepetctanddiffusionweightedmriforthedetectionofbonemetastasesinrecurrentprostatecanceracosteffectivenessanalysisinfrance AT cussenotolivier comparisonof18fsodiumfluoridepetct18ffluorocholinepetctanddiffusionweightedmriforthedetectionofbonemetastasesinrecurrentprostatecanceracosteffectivenessanalysisinfrance AT talbotjeannoel comparisonof18fsodiumfluoridepetct18ffluorocholinepetctanddiffusionweightedmriforthedetectionofbonemetastasesinrecurrentprostatecanceracosteffectivenessanalysisinfrance AT durandzaleskiisabelle comparisonof18fsodiumfluoridepetct18ffluorocholinepetctanddiffusionweightedmriforthedetectionofbonemetastasesinrecurrentprostatecanceracosteffectivenessanalysisinfrance |