Cargando…

Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of the Namaste Care program in long-term care settings in Canada

BACKGROUND: Residents living and dying in long-term care (LTC) homes represent one of society’s most frail and marginalized populations of older adults, particularly those residents with advanced dementia who are often excluded from activities that promote quality of life in their last months of lif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaasalainen, Sharon, Hunter, Paulette V., Dal Bello-Haas, Vanina, Dolovich, Lisa, Froggatt, Katherine, Hadjistavropoulos, Thomas, Markle-Reid, Maureen, Ploeg, Jenny, Simard, Joyce, Thabane, Lehana, van der Steen, Jenny T., Volicer, Ladislav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7053118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32161658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00575-4
_version_ 1783502977956315136
author Kaasalainen, Sharon
Hunter, Paulette V.
Dal Bello-Haas, Vanina
Dolovich, Lisa
Froggatt, Katherine
Hadjistavropoulos, Thomas
Markle-Reid, Maureen
Ploeg, Jenny
Simard, Joyce
Thabane, Lehana
van der Steen, Jenny T.
Volicer, Ladislav
author_facet Kaasalainen, Sharon
Hunter, Paulette V.
Dal Bello-Haas, Vanina
Dolovich, Lisa
Froggatt, Katherine
Hadjistavropoulos, Thomas
Markle-Reid, Maureen
Ploeg, Jenny
Simard, Joyce
Thabane, Lehana
van der Steen, Jenny T.
Volicer, Ladislav
author_sort Kaasalainen, Sharon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Residents living and dying in long-term care (LTC) homes represent one of society’s most frail and marginalized populations of older adults, particularly those residents with advanced dementia who are often excluded from activities that promote quality of life in their last months of life. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and effects of Namaste Care: an innovative program to improve end-of-life care for people with advanced dementia. METHODS: This study used a mixed-method survey design to evaluate the Namaste Care program in two LTC homes in Canada. Pain, quality of life, and medication costs were assessed for 31 residents before and 6 months after they participated in Namaste Care. The program consisted of two 2-h sessions per day for 5 days per week. Namaste Care staff provided high sensory care to residents in a calm, therapeutic environment in a small group setting. Feasibility was assessed in terms of recruitment rate, number of sessions attended, retention rate, and any adverse events. Acceptability was assessed using qualitative interviews with staff and family. RESULTS: The feasibility of Namaste Care was acceptable with a participation rate of 89%. However, participants received only 72% of the sessions delivered and only 78% stayed in the program for at least 3 months due to mortality. After attending Namaste Care, participants’ pain and quality of life improved and medication costs decreased. Family members and staff perceived the program to be beneficial, noting positive changes in residents. The majority of participants were very satisfied with the program, providing suggestions for ongoing engagement throughout the implementation process. CONCLUSIONS: These study findings support the implementation of the Namaste Care program in Canadian LTC homes to improve the quality of life for residents. However, further testing is needed on a larger scale.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7053118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70531182020-03-11 Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of the Namaste Care program in long-term care settings in Canada Kaasalainen, Sharon Hunter, Paulette V. Dal Bello-Haas, Vanina Dolovich, Lisa Froggatt, Katherine Hadjistavropoulos, Thomas Markle-Reid, Maureen Ploeg, Jenny Simard, Joyce Thabane, Lehana van der Steen, Jenny T. Volicer, Ladislav Pilot Feasibility Stud Research BACKGROUND: Residents living and dying in long-term care (LTC) homes represent one of society’s most frail and marginalized populations of older adults, particularly those residents with advanced dementia who are often excluded from activities that promote quality of life in their last months of life. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and effects of Namaste Care: an innovative program to improve end-of-life care for people with advanced dementia. METHODS: This study used a mixed-method survey design to evaluate the Namaste Care program in two LTC homes in Canada. Pain, quality of life, and medication costs were assessed for 31 residents before and 6 months after they participated in Namaste Care. The program consisted of two 2-h sessions per day for 5 days per week. Namaste Care staff provided high sensory care to residents in a calm, therapeutic environment in a small group setting. Feasibility was assessed in terms of recruitment rate, number of sessions attended, retention rate, and any adverse events. Acceptability was assessed using qualitative interviews with staff and family. RESULTS: The feasibility of Namaste Care was acceptable with a participation rate of 89%. However, participants received only 72% of the sessions delivered and only 78% stayed in the program for at least 3 months due to mortality. After attending Namaste Care, participants’ pain and quality of life improved and medication costs decreased. Family members and staff perceived the program to be beneficial, noting positive changes in residents. The majority of participants were very satisfied with the program, providing suggestions for ongoing engagement throughout the implementation process. CONCLUSIONS: These study findings support the implementation of the Namaste Care program in Canadian LTC homes to improve the quality of life for residents. However, further testing is needed on a larger scale. BioMed Central 2020-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7053118/ /pubmed/32161658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00575-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kaasalainen, Sharon
Hunter, Paulette V.
Dal Bello-Haas, Vanina
Dolovich, Lisa
Froggatt, Katherine
Hadjistavropoulos, Thomas
Markle-Reid, Maureen
Ploeg, Jenny
Simard, Joyce
Thabane, Lehana
van der Steen, Jenny T.
Volicer, Ladislav
Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of the Namaste Care program in long-term care settings in Canada
title Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of the Namaste Care program in long-term care settings in Canada
title_full Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of the Namaste Care program in long-term care settings in Canada
title_fullStr Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of the Namaste Care program in long-term care settings in Canada
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of the Namaste Care program in long-term care settings in Canada
title_short Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of the Namaste Care program in long-term care settings in Canada
title_sort evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of the namaste care program in long-term care settings in canada
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7053118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32161658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00575-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kaasalainensharon evaluatingthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofthenamastecareprograminlongtermcaresettingsincanada
AT hunterpaulettev evaluatingthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofthenamastecareprograminlongtermcaresettingsincanada
AT dalbellohaasvanina evaluatingthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofthenamastecareprograminlongtermcaresettingsincanada
AT dolovichlisa evaluatingthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofthenamastecareprograminlongtermcaresettingsincanada
AT froggattkatherine evaluatingthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofthenamastecareprograminlongtermcaresettingsincanada
AT hadjistavropoulosthomas evaluatingthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofthenamastecareprograminlongtermcaresettingsincanada
AT marklereidmaureen evaluatingthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofthenamastecareprograminlongtermcaresettingsincanada
AT ploegjenny evaluatingthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofthenamastecareprograminlongtermcaresettingsincanada
AT simardjoyce evaluatingthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofthenamastecareprograminlongtermcaresettingsincanada
AT thabanelehana evaluatingthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofthenamastecareprograminlongtermcaresettingsincanada
AT vandersteenjennyt evaluatingthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofthenamastecareprograminlongtermcaresettingsincanada
AT volicerladislav evaluatingthefeasibilityandacceptabilityofthenamastecareprograminlongtermcaresettingsincanada