Cargando…

Biofortification, Crop Adoption and Health Information: Impact Pathways in Mozambique and Uganda

Biofortification is a promising strategy to combat micronutrient malnutrition by promoting the adoption of staple food crops bred to be dense sources of specific micronutrients. Research on biofortified orange-fleshed sweet potato (OFSP) has shown that the crop improves the vitamin A status of child...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Brauw, Alan, Eozenou, Patrick, Gilligan, Daniel O., Hotz, Christine, Kumar, Neha, Meenakshi, J.V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7053385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32139914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aay005
_version_ 1783503030734290944
author de Brauw, Alan
Eozenou, Patrick
Gilligan, Daniel O.
Hotz, Christine
Kumar, Neha
Meenakshi, J.V.
author_facet de Brauw, Alan
Eozenou, Patrick
Gilligan, Daniel O.
Hotz, Christine
Kumar, Neha
Meenakshi, J.V.
author_sort de Brauw, Alan
collection PubMed
description Biofortification is a promising strategy to combat micronutrient malnutrition by promoting the adoption of staple food crops bred to be dense sources of specific micronutrients. Research on biofortified orange-fleshed sweet potato (OFSP) has shown that the crop improves the vitamin A status of children who consume as little as 100 grams per day, and intensive promotion strategies improve dietary intakes of vitamin A in field experiments. However, little is known about OFSP adoption behavior, or about the role that nutrition information plays in promoting adoption and changing diet. We report evidence from similar randomized field experiments conducted in Mozambique and Uganda to promote OFSP. We further use causal mediation analysis to study impact pathways for adoption and dietary intakes. Despite different agronomic conditions and sweet potato cropping patterns across the two countries, the project had similar impacts, leading to adoption by 61% to 68% of farmers exposed to the project, and doubling vitamin A intakes in children. In both countries, two intervention models that differed in training intensity and cost had comparable impacts relative to the control group. The project increased the knowledge of key nutrition messages; however, added knowledge of nutrition messages appears to have minimally affected adoption, conditional on assumptions required for causal mediation analysis. Increased vitamin A intakes were largely explained by adoption and not by nutrition knowledge gained, though in Uganda a large share of impacts on vitamin A intakes cannot be explained by mediating variables. Similar impacts could likely have been achieved by reducing the scope of nutrition trainings. JEL codes: I15, O12, O13, Q12.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7053385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70533852020-03-03 Biofortification, Crop Adoption and Health Information: Impact Pathways in Mozambique and Uganda de Brauw, Alan Eozenou, Patrick Gilligan, Daniel O. Hotz, Christine Kumar, Neha Meenakshi, J.V. Am J Agric Econ Article Biofortification is a promising strategy to combat micronutrient malnutrition by promoting the adoption of staple food crops bred to be dense sources of specific micronutrients. Research on biofortified orange-fleshed sweet potato (OFSP) has shown that the crop improves the vitamin A status of children who consume as little as 100 grams per day, and intensive promotion strategies improve dietary intakes of vitamin A in field experiments. However, little is known about OFSP adoption behavior, or about the role that nutrition information plays in promoting adoption and changing diet. We report evidence from similar randomized field experiments conducted in Mozambique and Uganda to promote OFSP. We further use causal mediation analysis to study impact pathways for adoption and dietary intakes. Despite different agronomic conditions and sweet potato cropping patterns across the two countries, the project had similar impacts, leading to adoption by 61% to 68% of farmers exposed to the project, and doubling vitamin A intakes in children. In both countries, two intervention models that differed in training intensity and cost had comparable impacts relative to the control group. The project increased the knowledge of key nutrition messages; however, added knowledge of nutrition messages appears to have minimally affected adoption, conditional on assumptions required for causal mediation analysis. Increased vitamin A intakes were largely explained by adoption and not by nutrition knowledge gained, though in Uganda a large share of impacts on vitamin A intakes cannot be explained by mediating variables. Similar impacts could likely have been achieved by reducing the scope of nutrition trainings. JEL codes: I15, O12, O13, Q12. Oxford University Press 2018-03-15 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC7053385/ /pubmed/32139914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aay005 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
de Brauw, Alan
Eozenou, Patrick
Gilligan, Daniel O.
Hotz, Christine
Kumar, Neha
Meenakshi, J.V.
Biofortification, Crop Adoption and Health Information: Impact Pathways in Mozambique and Uganda
title Biofortification, Crop Adoption and Health Information: Impact Pathways in Mozambique and Uganda
title_full Biofortification, Crop Adoption and Health Information: Impact Pathways in Mozambique and Uganda
title_fullStr Biofortification, Crop Adoption and Health Information: Impact Pathways in Mozambique and Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Biofortification, Crop Adoption and Health Information: Impact Pathways in Mozambique and Uganda
title_short Biofortification, Crop Adoption and Health Information: Impact Pathways in Mozambique and Uganda
title_sort biofortification, crop adoption and health information: impact pathways in mozambique and uganda
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7053385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32139914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aay005
work_keys_str_mv AT debrauwalan biofortificationcropadoptionandhealthinformationimpactpathwaysinmozambiqueanduganda
AT eozenoupatrick biofortificationcropadoptionandhealthinformationimpactpathwaysinmozambiqueanduganda
AT gilligandanielo biofortificationcropadoptionandhealthinformationimpactpathwaysinmozambiqueanduganda
AT hotzchristine biofortificationcropadoptionandhealthinformationimpactpathwaysinmozambiqueanduganda
AT kumarneha biofortificationcropadoptionandhealthinformationimpactpathwaysinmozambiqueanduganda
AT meenakshijv biofortificationcropadoptionandhealthinformationimpactpathwaysinmozambiqueanduganda