Cargando…

Comparative efficacy of three topical anesthetics on 7-11-year-old children: a randomized clinical study

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the efficacy of three intraoral topical anesthetics in reducing the injection needle prick pain from local anesthetic among children aged 7–11 years old. METHODS: It is a prospective, Interventional, parallel design, single-blind, randomized clinical trial in which s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dasarraju, Rupak Kumar, SVSG, Nirmala
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7054072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32158957
http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.1.29
_version_ 1783503132195553280
author Dasarraju, Rupak Kumar
SVSG, Nirmala
author_facet Dasarraju, Rupak Kumar
SVSG, Nirmala
author_sort Dasarraju, Rupak Kumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the efficacy of three intraoral topical anesthetics in reducing the injection needle prick pain from local anesthetic among children aged 7–11 years old. METHODS: It is a prospective, Interventional, parallel design, single-blind, randomized clinical trial in which subjects (n=90) aged 7–11 years were included in the study based on an inclusion criteria. Subjects were divided into three groups based on computer-generated randomization with an allocation ratio of 1:1:1. Groups A, B, and C received benzocaine 20% jelly (Mucopain gel, ICPA health products Ltd, Ankleshwar, India), cetacaine anesthetic liquid (Cetylite Industries, Inc, Pennsauken, NJ), and EMLA cream (2% AstraZeneca UK Ltd, Luton, UK), respectively, according to manufacturer's instructions, for 1 minute prior to local anesthetic injection. After application of topical anesthetic agent, for all the groups, baseline pre-operative (prior to topical anesthetic administration) and post-operative scores (after local anesthetic administration) of pulse rate was recorded using Pulse oximeter (Gibson, Fingertip Pulse Oximeter, MD300C29, Beijing Choice Electronic). Peri-operative (i.e., during the administration of local anesthesia) scores were recorded using Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Scale, Modified Children hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CPS) behavior rating scale, and Faces Pain Scale (FPS-R) – Revised (For self-reported pain). Direct self-reported and physiological measures were ascertained using FPS-R – Revised and Pulse oximeter, respectively, whereas CPS and FLACC scales assessed behavioral measures. To test the mean difference between the three groups, a one way ANOVA with post hoc tests was used. For statistical significance, a two-tailed probability value of P < 0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS: The Cetacaine group had significantly lower pain scores for self-report (P < 0.001), behavioral, and physiological measures (P < 0.001) than the other two groups. However, there was no significant difference between the Benzocaine group and EMLA group during palatal injection prick. CONCLUSION: Cetacaine can be considered as an effective topical anesthetic agent compared to benzocaine 20% jelly (Mucopain gel) and EMLA cream.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7054072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70540722020-03-10 Comparative efficacy of three topical anesthetics on 7-11-year-old children: a randomized clinical study Dasarraju, Rupak Kumar SVSG, Nirmala J Dent Anesth Pain Med Original Article BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the efficacy of three intraoral topical anesthetics in reducing the injection needle prick pain from local anesthetic among children aged 7–11 years old. METHODS: It is a prospective, Interventional, parallel design, single-blind, randomized clinical trial in which subjects (n=90) aged 7–11 years were included in the study based on an inclusion criteria. Subjects were divided into three groups based on computer-generated randomization with an allocation ratio of 1:1:1. Groups A, B, and C received benzocaine 20% jelly (Mucopain gel, ICPA health products Ltd, Ankleshwar, India), cetacaine anesthetic liquid (Cetylite Industries, Inc, Pennsauken, NJ), and EMLA cream (2% AstraZeneca UK Ltd, Luton, UK), respectively, according to manufacturer's instructions, for 1 minute prior to local anesthetic injection. After application of topical anesthetic agent, for all the groups, baseline pre-operative (prior to topical anesthetic administration) and post-operative scores (after local anesthetic administration) of pulse rate was recorded using Pulse oximeter (Gibson, Fingertip Pulse Oximeter, MD300C29, Beijing Choice Electronic). Peri-operative (i.e., during the administration of local anesthesia) scores were recorded using Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Scale, Modified Children hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CPS) behavior rating scale, and Faces Pain Scale (FPS-R) – Revised (For self-reported pain). Direct self-reported and physiological measures were ascertained using FPS-R – Revised and Pulse oximeter, respectively, whereas CPS and FLACC scales assessed behavioral measures. To test the mean difference between the three groups, a one way ANOVA with post hoc tests was used. For statistical significance, a two-tailed probability value of P < 0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS: The Cetacaine group had significantly lower pain scores for self-report (P < 0.001), behavioral, and physiological measures (P < 0.001) than the other two groups. However, there was no significant difference between the Benzocaine group and EMLA group during palatal injection prick. CONCLUSION: Cetacaine can be considered as an effective topical anesthetic agent compared to benzocaine 20% jelly (Mucopain gel) and EMLA cream. The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2020-02 2020-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7054072/ /pubmed/32158957 http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.1.29 Text en Copyright © 2020 Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dasarraju, Rupak Kumar
SVSG, Nirmala
Comparative efficacy of three topical anesthetics on 7-11-year-old children: a randomized clinical study
title Comparative efficacy of three topical anesthetics on 7-11-year-old children: a randomized clinical study
title_full Comparative efficacy of three topical anesthetics on 7-11-year-old children: a randomized clinical study
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy of three topical anesthetics on 7-11-year-old children: a randomized clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy of three topical anesthetics on 7-11-year-old children: a randomized clinical study
title_short Comparative efficacy of three topical anesthetics on 7-11-year-old children: a randomized clinical study
title_sort comparative efficacy of three topical anesthetics on 7-11-year-old children: a randomized clinical study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7054072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32158957
http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.1.29
work_keys_str_mv AT dasarrajurupakkumar comparativeefficacyofthreetopicalanestheticson711yearoldchildrenarandomizedclinicalstudy
AT svsgnirmala comparativeefficacyofthreetopicalanestheticson711yearoldchildrenarandomizedclinicalstudy