Cargando…

The Evolution of Flow-Diverting Stents for Cerebral Aneurysms; Historical Review, Modern Application, Complications, and Future Direction

In spite of the developing endovascular era, large (15–25 mm) and giant (>25 mm) wide-neck cerebral aneurysms remained technically challenging. Intracranial flow-diverting stents (FDS) were developed to address these challenges by targeting aneurysm hemodynamics to promote aneurysm occlusion. In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shin, Dong-Seong, Carroll, Christopher P., Elghareeb, Mohammed, Hoh, Brian L., Kim, Bum-Tae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Neurosurgical Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7054118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32120455
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2020.0034
_version_ 1783503138057093120
author Shin, Dong-Seong
Carroll, Christopher P.
Elghareeb, Mohammed
Hoh, Brian L.
Kim, Bum-Tae
author_facet Shin, Dong-Seong
Carroll, Christopher P.
Elghareeb, Mohammed
Hoh, Brian L.
Kim, Bum-Tae
author_sort Shin, Dong-Seong
collection PubMed
description In spite of the developing endovascular era, large (15–25 mm) and giant (>25 mm) wide-neck cerebral aneurysms remained technically challenging. Intracranial flow-diverting stents (FDS) were developed to address these challenges by targeting aneurysm hemodynamics to promote aneurysm occlusion. In 2011, the first FDS approved for use in the United States market. Shortly thereafter, the Pipeline of Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms (PUFS) study was published demonstrating high efficacy and a similar complication profile to other intracranial stents. The initial FDA instructions for use (IFU) limited its use to patients 22 years old or older with wide-necked large or giant aneurysms of the internal carotid artery (ICA) from the petrous segment to superior hypophyseal artery/ophthalmic segment. Expanded IFU was tested in the Prospective Study on Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms with PipelineTM Embolization Device (PREMIER) trial. With further post-approval clinical data, the United States FDA expanded the IFU to include patients with small or medium, wide-necked saccular or fusiform aneurysms from the petrous ICA to the ICA terminus. However, IFU is more restrictive in South Korea than in United States. Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have sought to evaluate the overall efficacy of FDS for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms and consistently identify FDS as an effective technique for the treatment of aneurysms broadly with complication rates similar to other traditional techniques. A growing body of literature has demonstrated high efficacy of FDS for small aneurysms; distal artery aneurysms; non-saccular aneurysms posterior circulation aneurysms and complication rates similar to traditional techniques. In the short interval since the Pipeline Embolization Device was first introduced, FDS has been firmly entrenched as a powerful tool in the endovascular armamentarium. As new FDS are developed, established FDS are refined, and delivery systems are improved the uses for FDS will only expand further. Researchers continue to work to optimize the mechanical characteristics of the FDS themselves, aiming to optimize deploy ability and efficacy. With expanded use for small to medium aneurysms and posterior circulation aneurysms, FDS technology is firmly entrenched as a powerful tool to treat challenging aneurysms, both primarily and as an adjunct to coil embolization. With the aforementioned advances, the ease of FDS deployment will improve and complication rates will be further minimized. This will only further establish FDS deployment as a key strategy in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7054118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Neurosurgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70541182020-03-05 The Evolution of Flow-Diverting Stents for Cerebral Aneurysms; Historical Review, Modern Application, Complications, and Future Direction Shin, Dong-Seong Carroll, Christopher P. Elghareeb, Mohammed Hoh, Brian L. Kim, Bum-Tae J Korean Neurosurg Soc Review Article In spite of the developing endovascular era, large (15–25 mm) and giant (>25 mm) wide-neck cerebral aneurysms remained technically challenging. Intracranial flow-diverting stents (FDS) were developed to address these challenges by targeting aneurysm hemodynamics to promote aneurysm occlusion. In 2011, the first FDS approved for use in the United States market. Shortly thereafter, the Pipeline of Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms (PUFS) study was published demonstrating high efficacy and a similar complication profile to other intracranial stents. The initial FDA instructions for use (IFU) limited its use to patients 22 years old or older with wide-necked large or giant aneurysms of the internal carotid artery (ICA) from the petrous segment to superior hypophyseal artery/ophthalmic segment. Expanded IFU was tested in the Prospective Study on Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms with PipelineTM Embolization Device (PREMIER) trial. With further post-approval clinical data, the United States FDA expanded the IFU to include patients with small or medium, wide-necked saccular or fusiform aneurysms from the petrous ICA to the ICA terminus. However, IFU is more restrictive in South Korea than in United States. Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have sought to evaluate the overall efficacy of FDS for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms and consistently identify FDS as an effective technique for the treatment of aneurysms broadly with complication rates similar to other traditional techniques. A growing body of literature has demonstrated high efficacy of FDS for small aneurysms; distal artery aneurysms; non-saccular aneurysms posterior circulation aneurysms and complication rates similar to traditional techniques. In the short interval since the Pipeline Embolization Device was first introduced, FDS has been firmly entrenched as a powerful tool in the endovascular armamentarium. As new FDS are developed, established FDS are refined, and delivery systems are improved the uses for FDS will only expand further. Researchers continue to work to optimize the mechanical characteristics of the FDS themselves, aiming to optimize deploy ability and efficacy. With expanded use for small to medium aneurysms and posterior circulation aneurysms, FDS technology is firmly entrenched as a powerful tool to treat challenging aneurysms, both primarily and as an adjunct to coil embolization. With the aforementioned advances, the ease of FDS deployment will improve and complication rates will be further minimized. This will only further establish FDS deployment as a key strategy in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Korean Neurosurgical Society 2020-03 2020-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7054118/ /pubmed/32120455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2020.0034 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Korean Neurosurgical Society This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Shin, Dong-Seong
Carroll, Christopher P.
Elghareeb, Mohammed
Hoh, Brian L.
Kim, Bum-Tae
The Evolution of Flow-Diverting Stents for Cerebral Aneurysms; Historical Review, Modern Application, Complications, and Future Direction
title The Evolution of Flow-Diverting Stents for Cerebral Aneurysms; Historical Review, Modern Application, Complications, and Future Direction
title_full The Evolution of Flow-Diverting Stents for Cerebral Aneurysms; Historical Review, Modern Application, Complications, and Future Direction
title_fullStr The Evolution of Flow-Diverting Stents for Cerebral Aneurysms; Historical Review, Modern Application, Complications, and Future Direction
title_full_unstemmed The Evolution of Flow-Diverting Stents for Cerebral Aneurysms; Historical Review, Modern Application, Complications, and Future Direction
title_short The Evolution of Flow-Diverting Stents for Cerebral Aneurysms; Historical Review, Modern Application, Complications, and Future Direction
title_sort evolution of flow-diverting stents for cerebral aneurysms; historical review, modern application, complications, and future direction
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7054118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32120455
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2020.0034
work_keys_str_mv AT shindongseong theevolutionofflowdivertingstentsforcerebralaneurysmshistoricalreviewmodernapplicationcomplicationsandfuturedirection
AT carrollchristopherp theevolutionofflowdivertingstentsforcerebralaneurysmshistoricalreviewmodernapplicationcomplicationsandfuturedirection
AT elghareebmohammed theevolutionofflowdivertingstentsforcerebralaneurysmshistoricalreviewmodernapplicationcomplicationsandfuturedirection
AT hohbrianl theevolutionofflowdivertingstentsforcerebralaneurysmshistoricalreviewmodernapplicationcomplicationsandfuturedirection
AT kimbumtae theevolutionofflowdivertingstentsforcerebralaneurysmshistoricalreviewmodernapplicationcomplicationsandfuturedirection
AT shindongseong evolutionofflowdivertingstentsforcerebralaneurysmshistoricalreviewmodernapplicationcomplicationsandfuturedirection
AT carrollchristopherp evolutionofflowdivertingstentsforcerebralaneurysmshistoricalreviewmodernapplicationcomplicationsandfuturedirection
AT elghareebmohammed evolutionofflowdivertingstentsforcerebralaneurysmshistoricalreviewmodernapplicationcomplicationsandfuturedirection
AT hohbrianl evolutionofflowdivertingstentsforcerebralaneurysmshistoricalreviewmodernapplicationcomplicationsandfuturedirection
AT kimbumtae evolutionofflowdivertingstentsforcerebralaneurysmshistoricalreviewmodernapplicationcomplicationsandfuturedirection