Cargando…
The Extremely Preterm Infant: Ethical Considerations in Life-and-Death Decision-Making
Care of the preterm infant has improved tremendously over the last 60 years, with attendant improvement in outcomes. For the extremely preterm infant, <28 weeks' gestation, concerns related to survival as well as neurodevelopmental impairment, have influenced decision-making to a much larger...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7054342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32175292 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.00055 |
_version_ | 1783503176453849088 |
---|---|
author | Albersheim, Susan |
author_facet | Albersheim, Susan |
author_sort | Albersheim, Susan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Care of the preterm infant has improved tremendously over the last 60 years, with attendant improvement in outcomes. For the extremely preterm infant, <28 weeks' gestation, concerns related to survival as well as neurodevelopmental impairment, have influenced decision-making to a much larger extent than seen in older children. Possible reasons for conferring a different status on extremely preterm infants include: (1) the belief that the brain is a privileged organ, (2) the degree of medical uncertainty in terms of outcomes, (3) the fact that the family will deal with the psychological, emotional, physical, and financial consequences of treatment decisions, (4) that the extremely preterm looks more like a fetus than a term newborn, (5) the initial lack of relational identity, (6) the fact that extremely preterm infants are technology-dependent, and (7) the timing of decision-making around delivery. Treating extremely preterm infants differently does not hold up to scrutiny. They are owed the same respect as other pediatric patients, in terms of personhood, and we have the same duties to care for them. However, the degree of medical uncertainty and the fact that parents will deal with the consequences of decision-making, highlights the importance of providing a wide band of discretion in parental decision-making authority. Ethical principles considered in decision-making include best interest (historically the sine qua non of pediatric decision-making), a reasonable person standard, the “good enough” parent, and the harm principle, the latter two being more pragmatic. To operationalize these principles, potential models for decision-making are the Zone of Parental Discretion, the Not Unreasonable Standard, and a Shared Decision-Making model. In the final analysis shared decision-making with a wide zone of parental discretion, which is based on the harm principle, would provide fair and equitable decision-making for the extremely preterm infant. However, in the rare circumstance where parents do not wish to embark upon intensive care, against medical recommendations, it would be most helpful to develop local guidelines both for support of health care practitioners and to provide consistency of care for extremely preterm infants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7054342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70543422020-03-13 The Extremely Preterm Infant: Ethical Considerations in Life-and-Death Decision-Making Albersheim, Susan Front Pediatr Pediatrics Care of the preterm infant has improved tremendously over the last 60 years, with attendant improvement in outcomes. For the extremely preterm infant, <28 weeks' gestation, concerns related to survival as well as neurodevelopmental impairment, have influenced decision-making to a much larger extent than seen in older children. Possible reasons for conferring a different status on extremely preterm infants include: (1) the belief that the brain is a privileged organ, (2) the degree of medical uncertainty in terms of outcomes, (3) the fact that the family will deal with the psychological, emotional, physical, and financial consequences of treatment decisions, (4) that the extremely preterm looks more like a fetus than a term newborn, (5) the initial lack of relational identity, (6) the fact that extremely preterm infants are technology-dependent, and (7) the timing of decision-making around delivery. Treating extremely preterm infants differently does not hold up to scrutiny. They are owed the same respect as other pediatric patients, in terms of personhood, and we have the same duties to care for them. However, the degree of medical uncertainty and the fact that parents will deal with the consequences of decision-making, highlights the importance of providing a wide band of discretion in parental decision-making authority. Ethical principles considered in decision-making include best interest (historically the sine qua non of pediatric decision-making), a reasonable person standard, the “good enough” parent, and the harm principle, the latter two being more pragmatic. To operationalize these principles, potential models for decision-making are the Zone of Parental Discretion, the Not Unreasonable Standard, and a Shared Decision-Making model. In the final analysis shared decision-making with a wide zone of parental discretion, which is based on the harm principle, would provide fair and equitable decision-making for the extremely preterm infant. However, in the rare circumstance where parents do not wish to embark upon intensive care, against medical recommendations, it would be most helpful to develop local guidelines both for support of health care practitioners and to provide consistency of care for extremely preterm infants. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7054342/ /pubmed/32175292 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.00055 Text en Copyright © 2020 Albersheim. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pediatrics Albersheim, Susan The Extremely Preterm Infant: Ethical Considerations in Life-and-Death Decision-Making |
title | The Extremely Preterm Infant: Ethical Considerations in Life-and-Death Decision-Making |
title_full | The Extremely Preterm Infant: Ethical Considerations in Life-and-Death Decision-Making |
title_fullStr | The Extremely Preterm Infant: Ethical Considerations in Life-and-Death Decision-Making |
title_full_unstemmed | The Extremely Preterm Infant: Ethical Considerations in Life-and-Death Decision-Making |
title_short | The Extremely Preterm Infant: Ethical Considerations in Life-and-Death Decision-Making |
title_sort | extremely preterm infant: ethical considerations in life-and-death decision-making |
topic | Pediatrics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7054342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32175292 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.00055 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT albersheimsusan theextremelypreterminfantethicalconsiderationsinlifeanddeathdecisionmaking AT albersheimsusan extremelypreterminfantethicalconsiderationsinlifeanddeathdecisionmaking |