Cargando…

Retrospective Real-World Evaluation of Outcomes in Patients with Skin and Soft Structure Infections Treated with Tedizolid in an Outpatient Setting

INTRODUCTION: Outcomes data for patients who received tedizolid for acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSIs) are scant. We provide a real-world analysis of economic and clinical outcomes following tedizolid use in the outpatient setting. METHODS: This retrospective study of adult...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kullar, Ravina, Puzniak, Laura A., Swindle, Jason P., Lodise, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7054470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31974828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-019-00279-0
_version_ 1783503205381963776
author Kullar, Ravina
Puzniak, Laura A.
Swindle, Jason P.
Lodise, Thomas
author_facet Kullar, Ravina
Puzniak, Laura A.
Swindle, Jason P.
Lodise, Thomas
author_sort Kullar, Ravina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Outcomes data for patients who received tedizolid for acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSIs) are scant. We provide a real-world analysis of economic and clinical outcomes following tedizolid use in the outpatient setting. METHODS: This retrospective study of adults with skin infections treated with tedizolid (index period: 1 July 2014–31 May 2016) used data from the Optum Research and Impact National Benchmark databases. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients received tedizolid for the treatment of skin infections (with complications, n = 18; without complications, n = 73). Some patients had > 1 complication and infection site. Among patients with complications, pre-index complications during the [index date − 30] through [index date + 1] period included osteomyelitis (44.4%), septicemia (44.4%), and prosthetic joint/device/graft infection (16.7%). For the [index date − 7] through [index date + 1] period, the infection site included abscesses (55.6%) and chronic ulcers (38.9%). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) days supplied for the index tedizolid claim was 6.8 (2.3) days. Healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) during the 30-day post-index period included ≥ 1 ambulatory visit (100.0%), ≥ 1 emergency department (ED) visit (16.7%), and ≥ 1 hospitalization (22.2%). Median 30-day post-index all-cause costs were $11,098 [lower quartile (Q(1)), $5688; upper quartile (Q(3)), $16,246; mean (SD), $14,637 ($11,435)]. Among patients without complications, the pre-index infection site from ([index date − 7] through [index date + 1]) included abscesses (60.3%), chronic ulcers (37.0%), and cellulitis (2.7%). Mean (SD) days supplied for the index tedizolid claim was 6.6 (2.5) days. Thirty-day post-index HCRU included ≥ 1 ambulatory visit (91.8%), ≥ 1 ED visit (17.8%), and ≥ 1 hospitalization (5.5%). Median 30-day post-index all-cause costs were $3230 (Q(1), $2345; Q(3), $6847; mean [SD], $6898 [$11,129]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with tedizolid in the outpatient setting experienced a short duration of therapy, low hospital admission, and modest post-index HCRU indicators, suggesting its utility for outpatient therapy of ABSSSIs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40121-019-00279-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7054470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70544702020-03-16 Retrospective Real-World Evaluation of Outcomes in Patients with Skin and Soft Structure Infections Treated with Tedizolid in an Outpatient Setting Kullar, Ravina Puzniak, Laura A. Swindle, Jason P. Lodise, Thomas Infect Dis Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Outcomes data for patients who received tedizolid for acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSIs) are scant. We provide a real-world analysis of economic and clinical outcomes following tedizolid use in the outpatient setting. METHODS: This retrospective study of adults with skin infections treated with tedizolid (index period: 1 July 2014–31 May 2016) used data from the Optum Research and Impact National Benchmark databases. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients received tedizolid for the treatment of skin infections (with complications, n = 18; without complications, n = 73). Some patients had > 1 complication and infection site. Among patients with complications, pre-index complications during the [index date − 30] through [index date + 1] period included osteomyelitis (44.4%), septicemia (44.4%), and prosthetic joint/device/graft infection (16.7%). For the [index date − 7] through [index date + 1] period, the infection site included abscesses (55.6%) and chronic ulcers (38.9%). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) days supplied for the index tedizolid claim was 6.8 (2.3) days. Healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) during the 30-day post-index period included ≥ 1 ambulatory visit (100.0%), ≥ 1 emergency department (ED) visit (16.7%), and ≥ 1 hospitalization (22.2%). Median 30-day post-index all-cause costs were $11,098 [lower quartile (Q(1)), $5688; upper quartile (Q(3)), $16,246; mean (SD), $14,637 ($11,435)]. Among patients without complications, the pre-index infection site from ([index date − 7] through [index date + 1]) included abscesses (60.3%), chronic ulcers (37.0%), and cellulitis (2.7%). Mean (SD) days supplied for the index tedizolid claim was 6.6 (2.5) days. Thirty-day post-index HCRU included ≥ 1 ambulatory visit (91.8%), ≥ 1 ED visit (17.8%), and ≥ 1 hospitalization (5.5%). Median 30-day post-index all-cause costs were $3230 (Q(1), $2345; Q(3), $6847; mean [SD], $6898 [$11,129]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with tedizolid in the outpatient setting experienced a short duration of therapy, low hospital admission, and modest post-index HCRU indicators, suggesting its utility for outpatient therapy of ABSSSIs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40121-019-00279-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2020-01-23 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7054470/ /pubmed/31974828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-019-00279-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Kullar, Ravina
Puzniak, Laura A.
Swindle, Jason P.
Lodise, Thomas
Retrospective Real-World Evaluation of Outcomes in Patients with Skin and Soft Structure Infections Treated with Tedizolid in an Outpatient Setting
title Retrospective Real-World Evaluation of Outcomes in Patients with Skin and Soft Structure Infections Treated with Tedizolid in an Outpatient Setting
title_full Retrospective Real-World Evaluation of Outcomes in Patients with Skin and Soft Structure Infections Treated with Tedizolid in an Outpatient Setting
title_fullStr Retrospective Real-World Evaluation of Outcomes in Patients with Skin and Soft Structure Infections Treated with Tedizolid in an Outpatient Setting
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective Real-World Evaluation of Outcomes in Patients with Skin and Soft Structure Infections Treated with Tedizolid in an Outpatient Setting
title_short Retrospective Real-World Evaluation of Outcomes in Patients with Skin and Soft Structure Infections Treated with Tedizolid in an Outpatient Setting
title_sort retrospective real-world evaluation of outcomes in patients with skin and soft structure infections treated with tedizolid in an outpatient setting
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7054470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31974828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-019-00279-0
work_keys_str_mv AT kullarravina retrospectiverealworldevaluationofoutcomesinpatientswithskinandsoftstructureinfectionstreatedwithtedizolidinanoutpatientsetting
AT puzniaklauraa retrospectiverealworldevaluationofoutcomesinpatientswithskinandsoftstructureinfectionstreatedwithtedizolidinanoutpatientsetting
AT swindlejasonp retrospectiverealworldevaluationofoutcomesinpatientswithskinandsoftstructureinfectionstreatedwithtedizolidinanoutpatientsetting
AT lodisethomas retrospectiverealworldevaluationofoutcomesinpatientswithskinandsoftstructureinfectionstreatedwithtedizolidinanoutpatientsetting