Cargando…
Giving radiologists a voice: a review of podcasts in radiology
OBJECTIVES: Podcasts are audio recordings distributed via the Internet. We review the availability of podcasts on the topic of radiology. METHODS: A search for podcasts relating to radiology was performed using search engines and free public websites that either hosted or distributed podcasts. Only...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7054486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32128639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-0842-3 |
_version_ | 1783503208201584640 |
---|---|
author | Clarke, Christopher G. D. Nnajiuba, Uzoma Howie, Jamie Khan, Muhammad Pinto dos Santos, Daniel Ranschaert, Erik |
author_facet | Clarke, Christopher G. D. Nnajiuba, Uzoma Howie, Jamie Khan, Muhammad Pinto dos Santos, Daniel Ranschaert, Erik |
author_sort | Clarke, Christopher G. D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Podcasts are audio recordings distributed via the Internet. We review the availability of podcasts on the topic of radiology. METHODS: A search for podcasts relating to radiology was performed using search engines and free public websites that either hosted or distributed podcasts. Only English language podcast series were included, and video podcasts were excluded. Data was gathered by manually interrogating the metadata on the primary hosting platform and related websites. RESULTS: Forty-one podcast series met the inclusion criteria. The earliest was from 2005. In total, 56.1% of podcasts were defined as active and 43.9% inactive at the time of publication. Number of episodes for each podcast series ranged from 1 to 269 with 56.1% of podcasts having ≤ 10 episodes. There was a wide variation in podcast series’ frequency/schedules. The most common subject topic was ‘radiology current affairs’ (43.9%), with the least common ‘exam revision’ (7.3%) and ‘radiography’ (7.3%). The majority of podcasts were targeted at radiologists (87.8%) and originated from the USA (70.1%). Podcast hosts consisted of doctors (63.4%), other professionals (29.3%) or unknown (7.3%). Additional supplementary media or information as show notes were provided by 26.8% of radiology podcast series. CONCLUSIONS: This gives a new insight into the world of ‘radiology podcasting’. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first review in the literature and highlights the increasing availability of podcasting in radiology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7054486 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70544862020-03-16 Giving radiologists a voice: a review of podcasts in radiology Clarke, Christopher G. D. Nnajiuba, Uzoma Howie, Jamie Khan, Muhammad Pinto dos Santos, Daniel Ranschaert, Erik Insights Imaging Educational Review OBJECTIVES: Podcasts are audio recordings distributed via the Internet. We review the availability of podcasts on the topic of radiology. METHODS: A search for podcasts relating to radiology was performed using search engines and free public websites that either hosted or distributed podcasts. Only English language podcast series were included, and video podcasts were excluded. Data was gathered by manually interrogating the metadata on the primary hosting platform and related websites. RESULTS: Forty-one podcast series met the inclusion criteria. The earliest was from 2005. In total, 56.1% of podcasts were defined as active and 43.9% inactive at the time of publication. Number of episodes for each podcast series ranged from 1 to 269 with 56.1% of podcasts having ≤ 10 episodes. There was a wide variation in podcast series’ frequency/schedules. The most common subject topic was ‘radiology current affairs’ (43.9%), with the least common ‘exam revision’ (7.3%) and ‘radiography’ (7.3%). The majority of podcasts were targeted at radiologists (87.8%) and originated from the USA (70.1%). Podcast hosts consisted of doctors (63.4%), other professionals (29.3%) or unknown (7.3%). Additional supplementary media or information as show notes were provided by 26.8% of radiology podcast series. CONCLUSIONS: This gives a new insight into the world of ‘radiology podcasting’. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first review in the literature and highlights the increasing availability of podcasting in radiology. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7054486/ /pubmed/32128639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-0842-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Educational Review Clarke, Christopher G. D. Nnajiuba, Uzoma Howie, Jamie Khan, Muhammad Pinto dos Santos, Daniel Ranschaert, Erik Giving radiologists a voice: a review of podcasts in radiology |
title | Giving radiologists a voice: a review of podcasts in radiology |
title_full | Giving radiologists a voice: a review of podcasts in radiology |
title_fullStr | Giving radiologists a voice: a review of podcasts in radiology |
title_full_unstemmed | Giving radiologists a voice: a review of podcasts in radiology |
title_short | Giving radiologists a voice: a review of podcasts in radiology |
title_sort | giving radiologists a voice: a review of podcasts in radiology |
topic | Educational Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7054486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32128639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-0842-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clarkechristophergd givingradiologistsavoiceareviewofpodcastsinradiology AT nnajiubauzoma givingradiologistsavoiceareviewofpodcastsinradiology AT howiejamie givingradiologistsavoiceareviewofpodcastsinradiology AT khanmuhammad givingradiologistsavoiceareviewofpodcastsinradiology AT pintodossantosdaniel givingradiologistsavoiceareviewofpodcastsinradiology AT ranschaerterik givingradiologistsavoiceareviewofpodcastsinradiology |