Cargando…

Performance of single-use syringe versus multi-use MR contrast injectors: a prospective comparative study

The goal of this study was to compare performance parameters of a single-use syringe and a multi-use MR contrast injector. We compared preparation time, cost for disposables and volumes of contrast material used for a single-use (SI) and a multi-use (MI) MR contrast injector in a prospective cross-o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Struik, F., Futterer, J. J., Prokop, W. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7054519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32127584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60697-w
_version_ 1783503212477677568
author Struik, F.
Futterer, J. J.
Prokop, W. M.
author_facet Struik, F.
Futterer, J. J.
Prokop, W. M.
author_sort Struik, F.
collection PubMed
description The goal of this study was to compare performance parameters of a single-use syringe and a multi-use MR contrast injector. We compared preparation time, cost for disposables and volumes of contrast material used for a single-use (SI) and a multi-use (MI) MR contrast injector in a prospective cross-over trial. During the first study period all consecutive patients eligible for dynamic MR on two systems were included during a period of 20 working days. After 10 days, the injector was switched. Radiographer satisfaction was evaluated using a questionnaire. Contrast usage and waste on system MI was optimised by extra instructions for our radiographers and measured during the second study period of 10 consecutive working days. A total of 202 and 163 patients for systems SI and MI were included, respectively. Average preparation time was 4:55 min for SI and 2:24 min for MI (p < 0.05). Contrast waste for SI was 13% using 7.5 ml syringes. Contrast waste for MI was 5% for 7.5 ml containers. Costs for disposables were lower for MI if more than 5 patients per day were injected. Radiographer satisfaction was higher for MI (4.7 versus 2.8 on a 5-point scale; p < 0.05). The multi-use MR contrast injector led to higher radiographer satisfaction, shorter preparation time, and lower cost if more than 5 patients were injected per day. In addition, cheaper contrast containers of 15 or 30 ml could be used for the first patients if more than 2 or more than 4 injections are performed per day, potentially leading to lower contrast waste.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7054519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70545192020-03-11 Performance of single-use syringe versus multi-use MR contrast injectors: a prospective comparative study Struik, F. Futterer, J. J. Prokop, W. M. Sci Rep Article The goal of this study was to compare performance parameters of a single-use syringe and a multi-use MR contrast injector. We compared preparation time, cost for disposables and volumes of contrast material used for a single-use (SI) and a multi-use (MI) MR contrast injector in a prospective cross-over trial. During the first study period all consecutive patients eligible for dynamic MR on two systems were included during a period of 20 working days. After 10 days, the injector was switched. Radiographer satisfaction was evaluated using a questionnaire. Contrast usage and waste on system MI was optimised by extra instructions for our radiographers and measured during the second study period of 10 consecutive working days. A total of 202 and 163 patients for systems SI and MI were included, respectively. Average preparation time was 4:55 min for SI and 2:24 min for MI (p < 0.05). Contrast waste for SI was 13% using 7.5 ml syringes. Contrast waste for MI was 5% for 7.5 ml containers. Costs for disposables were lower for MI if more than 5 patients per day were injected. Radiographer satisfaction was higher for MI (4.7 versus 2.8 on a 5-point scale; p < 0.05). The multi-use MR contrast injector led to higher radiographer satisfaction, shorter preparation time, and lower cost if more than 5 patients were injected per day. In addition, cheaper contrast containers of 15 or 30 ml could be used for the first patients if more than 2 or more than 4 injections are performed per day, potentially leading to lower contrast waste. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7054519/ /pubmed/32127584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60697-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Struik, F.
Futterer, J. J.
Prokop, W. M.
Performance of single-use syringe versus multi-use MR contrast injectors: a prospective comparative study
title Performance of single-use syringe versus multi-use MR contrast injectors: a prospective comparative study
title_full Performance of single-use syringe versus multi-use MR contrast injectors: a prospective comparative study
title_fullStr Performance of single-use syringe versus multi-use MR contrast injectors: a prospective comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Performance of single-use syringe versus multi-use MR contrast injectors: a prospective comparative study
title_short Performance of single-use syringe versus multi-use MR contrast injectors: a prospective comparative study
title_sort performance of single-use syringe versus multi-use mr contrast injectors: a prospective comparative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7054519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32127584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60697-w
work_keys_str_mv AT struikf performanceofsingleusesyringeversusmultiusemrcontrastinjectorsaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT futtererjj performanceofsingleusesyringeversusmultiusemrcontrastinjectorsaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT prokopwm performanceofsingleusesyringeversusmultiusemrcontrastinjectorsaprospectivecomparativestudy