Cargando…

Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization in Hepatic Surgery: A Review about the Embolic Materials and Their Effects on Liver Regeneration and Outcome

Liver volume and function after hepatectomies are directly correlated to postoperative complications and mortality. Consequently contemporary liver surgery has focused on reaching an adequate future liver remnant so as to diminish postoperative morbidity and mortality. Portal vein embolization has e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luz, Jose Hugo M., Gomes, Filipe V., Coimbra, Elia, Costa, Nuno V., Bilhim, Tiago
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7054797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32148959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9295852
_version_ 1783503259148746752
author Luz, Jose Hugo M.
Gomes, Filipe V.
Coimbra, Elia
Costa, Nuno V.
Bilhim, Tiago
author_facet Luz, Jose Hugo M.
Gomes, Filipe V.
Coimbra, Elia
Costa, Nuno V.
Bilhim, Tiago
author_sort Luz, Jose Hugo M.
collection PubMed
description Liver volume and function after hepatectomies are directly correlated to postoperative complications and mortality. Consequently contemporary liver surgery has focused on reaching an adequate future liver remnant so as to diminish postoperative morbidity and mortality. Portal vein embolization has evolved and is the standard of care as a liver regenerative strategy in many surgery departments worldwide before major liver resections. Different embolic materials have been used for portal vein embolization including gelfoam, ethanol, polyvinyl-alcohol particles, calibrated microspheres, central vascular plugs, coils, n-butyl-cyanoacrylate glue, fibrin glue, polidocanol-foam, alcoholic prolamin solution, and ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer, as sole occluders or in varied combinations. While to date there has been no prospective controlled trial comparing the efficacy of different embolic materials in portal vein embolization, retrospective data insinuates that the use of n-butyl-cyanoacrylate and absolute ethanol produces higher contralateral liver hypertrophies. In this review, we evaluated publications up to August 2019 to assess the technical and regenerative results of portal vein embolization accomplished with different embolic materials. Special attention was given to specific aspects, advantages, and drawbacks of each embolic agent used for portal vein embolization, its liver regenerative performance, and its influence on patient outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7054797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70547972020-03-06 Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization in Hepatic Surgery: A Review about the Embolic Materials and Their Effects on Liver Regeneration and Outcome Luz, Jose Hugo M. Gomes, Filipe V. Coimbra, Elia Costa, Nuno V. Bilhim, Tiago Radiol Res Pract Review Article Liver volume and function after hepatectomies are directly correlated to postoperative complications and mortality. Consequently contemporary liver surgery has focused on reaching an adequate future liver remnant so as to diminish postoperative morbidity and mortality. Portal vein embolization has evolved and is the standard of care as a liver regenerative strategy in many surgery departments worldwide before major liver resections. Different embolic materials have been used for portal vein embolization including gelfoam, ethanol, polyvinyl-alcohol particles, calibrated microspheres, central vascular plugs, coils, n-butyl-cyanoacrylate glue, fibrin glue, polidocanol-foam, alcoholic prolamin solution, and ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer, as sole occluders or in varied combinations. While to date there has been no prospective controlled trial comparing the efficacy of different embolic materials in portal vein embolization, retrospective data insinuates that the use of n-butyl-cyanoacrylate and absolute ethanol produces higher contralateral liver hypertrophies. In this review, we evaluated publications up to August 2019 to assess the technical and regenerative results of portal vein embolization accomplished with different embolic materials. Special attention was given to specific aspects, advantages, and drawbacks of each embolic agent used for portal vein embolization, its liver regenerative performance, and its influence on patient outcome. Hindawi 2020-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7054797/ /pubmed/32148959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9295852 Text en Copyright © 2020 Jose Hugo M. Luz et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Luz, Jose Hugo M.
Gomes, Filipe V.
Coimbra, Elia
Costa, Nuno V.
Bilhim, Tiago
Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization in Hepatic Surgery: A Review about the Embolic Materials and Their Effects on Liver Regeneration and Outcome
title Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization in Hepatic Surgery: A Review about the Embolic Materials and Their Effects on Liver Regeneration and Outcome
title_full Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization in Hepatic Surgery: A Review about the Embolic Materials and Their Effects on Liver Regeneration and Outcome
title_fullStr Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization in Hepatic Surgery: A Review about the Embolic Materials and Their Effects on Liver Regeneration and Outcome
title_full_unstemmed Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization in Hepatic Surgery: A Review about the Embolic Materials and Their Effects on Liver Regeneration and Outcome
title_short Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization in Hepatic Surgery: A Review about the Embolic Materials and Their Effects on Liver Regeneration and Outcome
title_sort preoperative portal vein embolization in hepatic surgery: a review about the embolic materials and their effects on liver regeneration and outcome
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7054797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32148959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9295852
work_keys_str_mv AT luzjosehugom preoperativeportalveinembolizationinhepaticsurgeryareviewabouttheembolicmaterialsandtheireffectsonliverregenerationandoutcome
AT gomesfilipev preoperativeportalveinembolizationinhepaticsurgeryareviewabouttheembolicmaterialsandtheireffectsonliverregenerationandoutcome
AT coimbraelia preoperativeportalveinembolizationinhepaticsurgeryareviewabouttheembolicmaterialsandtheireffectsonliverregenerationandoutcome
AT costanunov preoperativeportalveinembolizationinhepaticsurgeryareviewabouttheembolicmaterialsandtheireffectsonliverregenerationandoutcome
AT bilhimtiago preoperativeportalveinembolizationinhepaticsurgeryareviewabouttheembolicmaterialsandtheireffectsonliverregenerationandoutcome