Cargando…
Using four different clinical tools as predictors for pain after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: Treatment of postoperative pain remains a significant clinical problem, and prediction of patients with a risk of higher postoperative pain levels is an important focus. We aimed to identify patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) with risk of higher pain levels at 24 h postoper...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7055106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32126971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-00959-2 |
_version_ | 1783503310122123264 |
---|---|
author | Geisler, Anja Zachodnik, Josephine Laigaard, Jens Kruuse, Laura S. Sørensen, Charlotte V. Sandberg, Magnus Persson, Eva I. Mathiesen, Ole |
author_facet | Geisler, Anja Zachodnik, Josephine Laigaard, Jens Kruuse, Laura S. Sørensen, Charlotte V. Sandberg, Magnus Persson, Eva I. Mathiesen, Ole |
author_sort | Geisler, Anja |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Treatment of postoperative pain remains a significant clinical problem, and prediction of patients with a risk of higher postoperative pain levels is an important focus. We aimed to identify patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) with risk of higher pain levels at 24 h postoperatively by using four simple and easily available clinical tools. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study included 102 patients having THA at Zealand University Hospital in Denmark. The following predictive tools were investigated for identifying patients with higher postoperative pain levels at 24 h postoperatively, both at rest and during mobilization: preoperative pain by peripheral venous cannulation (PVC) (dichotomized according to numerical rating scale pain ≤ 2/> 2 (PVC-Low/PVC-High) (primary outcome); the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) nurses’ expectations of patients pain levels; patients early pain levels at the PACU; and patients own forecast of postoperative pain levels. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze comparisons between prediction groups. For the primary outcome we considered a p-value < 0.01 as statistically significant and for other outcomes a p-value of 0.05. RESULTS: We found no significant differences between the PVC groups for pain during mobilization at 24-h postoperatively: PVC-Low: 6 (4–8) (median, (IQR)) versus PVC-High: 7 (5–8) (median, (IQR)), p = 0.10; and for pain at rest: PVC-Low 2 (0–3) (median, (IQR)) versus PVC-High 3 (2–5) (median, (IQR)), p = 0.12. Other comparisons performed between predictive groups did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective cohort study of 102 THA patients, we did not find that preoperative pain by PVC, when using a cut-off point of NRS ≤ 2, were able to predict postoperative pain at 24 h postoperatively. Neither did PACU nurses’ prediction of pain, patients forecast of pain, nor did maximum pain levels at the PACU. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered 20th February 2018 at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03439566). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7055106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70551062020-03-10 Using four different clinical tools as predictors for pain after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study Geisler, Anja Zachodnik, Josephine Laigaard, Jens Kruuse, Laura S. Sørensen, Charlotte V. Sandberg, Magnus Persson, Eva I. Mathiesen, Ole BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Treatment of postoperative pain remains a significant clinical problem, and prediction of patients with a risk of higher postoperative pain levels is an important focus. We aimed to identify patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) with risk of higher pain levels at 24 h postoperatively by using four simple and easily available clinical tools. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study included 102 patients having THA at Zealand University Hospital in Denmark. The following predictive tools were investigated for identifying patients with higher postoperative pain levels at 24 h postoperatively, both at rest and during mobilization: preoperative pain by peripheral venous cannulation (PVC) (dichotomized according to numerical rating scale pain ≤ 2/> 2 (PVC-Low/PVC-High) (primary outcome); the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) nurses’ expectations of patients pain levels; patients early pain levels at the PACU; and patients own forecast of postoperative pain levels. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze comparisons between prediction groups. For the primary outcome we considered a p-value < 0.01 as statistically significant and for other outcomes a p-value of 0.05. RESULTS: We found no significant differences between the PVC groups for pain during mobilization at 24-h postoperatively: PVC-Low: 6 (4–8) (median, (IQR)) versus PVC-High: 7 (5–8) (median, (IQR)), p = 0.10; and for pain at rest: PVC-Low 2 (0–3) (median, (IQR)) versus PVC-High 3 (2–5) (median, (IQR)), p = 0.12. Other comparisons performed between predictive groups did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective cohort study of 102 THA patients, we did not find that preoperative pain by PVC, when using a cut-off point of NRS ≤ 2, were able to predict postoperative pain at 24 h postoperatively. Neither did PACU nurses’ prediction of pain, patients forecast of pain, nor did maximum pain levels at the PACU. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered 20th February 2018 at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03439566). BioMed Central 2020-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7055106/ /pubmed/32126971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-00959-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Geisler, Anja Zachodnik, Josephine Laigaard, Jens Kruuse, Laura S. Sørensen, Charlotte V. Sandberg, Magnus Persson, Eva I. Mathiesen, Ole Using four different clinical tools as predictors for pain after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study |
title | Using four different clinical tools as predictors for pain after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study |
title_full | Using four different clinical tools as predictors for pain after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Using four different clinical tools as predictors for pain after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Using four different clinical tools as predictors for pain after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study |
title_short | Using four different clinical tools as predictors for pain after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study |
title_sort | using four different clinical tools as predictors for pain after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7055106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32126971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-00959-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT geisleranja usingfourdifferentclinicaltoolsaspredictorsforpainaftertotalhiparthroplastyaprospectivecohortstudy AT zachodnikjosephine usingfourdifferentclinicaltoolsaspredictorsforpainaftertotalhiparthroplastyaprospectivecohortstudy AT laigaardjens usingfourdifferentclinicaltoolsaspredictorsforpainaftertotalhiparthroplastyaprospectivecohortstudy AT kruuselauras usingfourdifferentclinicaltoolsaspredictorsforpainaftertotalhiparthroplastyaprospectivecohortstudy AT sørensencharlottev usingfourdifferentclinicaltoolsaspredictorsforpainaftertotalhiparthroplastyaprospectivecohortstudy AT sandbergmagnus usingfourdifferentclinicaltoolsaspredictorsforpainaftertotalhiparthroplastyaprospectivecohortstudy AT perssonevai usingfourdifferentclinicaltoolsaspredictorsforpainaftertotalhiparthroplastyaprospectivecohortstudy AT mathiesenole usingfourdifferentclinicaltoolsaspredictorsforpainaftertotalhiparthroplastyaprospectivecohortstudy |