Cargando…
Antimicrobial Efficacy of Different Decontamination Methods as Tested on Dental Implants with Various Types of Surfaces
BACKGROUND: Peri-implantitis is an inflammatory reaction affecting both hard and soft tissues surrounding dental implants. This pathological condition is caused by a polymicrobial aggressive biofilm that colonizes the implant and abutment surface at the peri-implant crevice level. The present in vit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7055194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32078588 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.920513 |
_version_ | 1783503324233859072 |
---|---|
author | Kubasiewicz-Ross, Paweł Hadzik, Jakub Gedrange, Tomasz Dominiak, Marzena Jurczyszyn, Kamil Pitułaj, Artur Nawrot-Hadzik, Izabela Bortkiewicz, Olga Fleischer, Małgorzata |
author_facet | Kubasiewicz-Ross, Paweł Hadzik, Jakub Gedrange, Tomasz Dominiak, Marzena Jurczyszyn, Kamil Pitułaj, Artur Nawrot-Hadzik, Izabela Bortkiewicz, Olga Fleischer, Małgorzata |
author_sort | Kubasiewicz-Ross, Paweł |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Peri-implantitis is an inflammatory reaction affecting both hard and soft tissues surrounding dental implants. This pathological condition is caused by a polymicrobial aggressive biofilm that colonizes the implant and abutment surface at the peri-implant crevice level. The present in vitro study evaluated different methods of implant surface decontamination and assessed whether the type of the implant surface influences the results. MATERIAL/METHODS: The study was conducted in an in vitro model of peri-implantitis using 30 implants. The implants were divided into 3 equal groups based on the surface characteristics: machined-surface, sand-blasted and acid-etched, and HA-coated. Implants were coated with E. coli biofilm. After an incubation period, they were decontaminated with 4 different methods: sonic scaler application, sonic scaler application with the chemical agent Perisolv(®) combination, Er: YAG laser treatment, and PDT therapy with methylene blue as a photosensitizer. RESULTS: The highest level of decontamination was achieved for machined-surface implants and for the combined chemical-mechanical and Er: YAG laser treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that the method of implant decontamination should be customized to the type of implant surface. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7055194 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | International Scientific Literature, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70551942020-03-16 Antimicrobial Efficacy of Different Decontamination Methods as Tested on Dental Implants with Various Types of Surfaces Kubasiewicz-Ross, Paweł Hadzik, Jakub Gedrange, Tomasz Dominiak, Marzena Jurczyszyn, Kamil Pitułaj, Artur Nawrot-Hadzik, Izabela Bortkiewicz, Olga Fleischer, Małgorzata Med Sci Monit Lab/In Vitro Research BACKGROUND: Peri-implantitis is an inflammatory reaction affecting both hard and soft tissues surrounding dental implants. This pathological condition is caused by a polymicrobial aggressive biofilm that colonizes the implant and abutment surface at the peri-implant crevice level. The present in vitro study evaluated different methods of implant surface decontamination and assessed whether the type of the implant surface influences the results. MATERIAL/METHODS: The study was conducted in an in vitro model of peri-implantitis using 30 implants. The implants were divided into 3 equal groups based on the surface characteristics: machined-surface, sand-blasted and acid-etched, and HA-coated. Implants were coated with E. coli biofilm. After an incubation period, they were decontaminated with 4 different methods: sonic scaler application, sonic scaler application with the chemical agent Perisolv(®) combination, Er: YAG laser treatment, and PDT therapy with methylene blue as a photosensitizer. RESULTS: The highest level of decontamination was achieved for machined-surface implants and for the combined chemical-mechanical and Er: YAG laser treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that the method of implant decontamination should be customized to the type of implant surface. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2020-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7055194/ /pubmed/32078588 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.920513 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2020 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Lab/In Vitro Research Kubasiewicz-Ross, Paweł Hadzik, Jakub Gedrange, Tomasz Dominiak, Marzena Jurczyszyn, Kamil Pitułaj, Artur Nawrot-Hadzik, Izabela Bortkiewicz, Olga Fleischer, Małgorzata Antimicrobial Efficacy of Different Decontamination Methods as Tested on Dental Implants with Various Types of Surfaces |
title | Antimicrobial Efficacy of Different Decontamination Methods as Tested on Dental Implants with Various Types of Surfaces |
title_full | Antimicrobial Efficacy of Different Decontamination Methods as Tested on Dental Implants with Various Types of Surfaces |
title_fullStr | Antimicrobial Efficacy of Different Decontamination Methods as Tested on Dental Implants with Various Types of Surfaces |
title_full_unstemmed | Antimicrobial Efficacy of Different Decontamination Methods as Tested on Dental Implants with Various Types of Surfaces |
title_short | Antimicrobial Efficacy of Different Decontamination Methods as Tested on Dental Implants with Various Types of Surfaces |
title_sort | antimicrobial efficacy of different decontamination methods as tested on dental implants with various types of surfaces |
topic | Lab/In Vitro Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7055194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32078588 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.920513 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kubasiewiczrosspaweł antimicrobialefficacyofdifferentdecontaminationmethodsastestedondentalimplantswithvarioustypesofsurfaces AT hadzikjakub antimicrobialefficacyofdifferentdecontaminationmethodsastestedondentalimplantswithvarioustypesofsurfaces AT gedrangetomasz antimicrobialefficacyofdifferentdecontaminationmethodsastestedondentalimplantswithvarioustypesofsurfaces AT dominiakmarzena antimicrobialefficacyofdifferentdecontaminationmethodsastestedondentalimplantswithvarioustypesofsurfaces AT jurczyszynkamil antimicrobialefficacyofdifferentdecontaminationmethodsastestedondentalimplantswithvarioustypesofsurfaces AT pitułajartur antimicrobialefficacyofdifferentdecontaminationmethodsastestedondentalimplantswithvarioustypesofsurfaces AT nawrothadzikizabela antimicrobialefficacyofdifferentdecontaminationmethodsastestedondentalimplantswithvarioustypesofsurfaces AT bortkiewiczolga antimicrobialefficacyofdifferentdecontaminationmethodsastestedondentalimplantswithvarioustypesofsurfaces AT fleischermałgorzata antimicrobialefficacyofdifferentdecontaminationmethodsastestedondentalimplantswithvarioustypesofsurfaces |