Cargando…

The First 250 ms of Auditory Processing: No Evidence of Early Processing Negativity in the Go/NoGo Task

Past evidence of an early Processing Negativity in auditory Go/NoGo event-related potential (ERP) data suggests that young adults proactively process sensory information in two-choice tasks. This study aimed to clarify the occurrence of Go/NoGo Processing Negativity and investigate the ERP component...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fogarty, Jack S., Barry, Robert J., Steiner, Genevieve Z.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7055275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32132630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61060-9
_version_ 1783503341561577472
author Fogarty, Jack S.
Barry, Robert J.
Steiner, Genevieve Z.
author_facet Fogarty, Jack S.
Barry, Robert J.
Steiner, Genevieve Z.
author_sort Fogarty, Jack S.
collection PubMed
description Past evidence of an early Processing Negativity in auditory Go/NoGo event-related potential (ERP) data suggests that young adults proactively process sensory information in two-choice tasks. This study aimed to clarify the occurrence of Go/NoGo Processing Negativity and investigate the ERP component series related to the first 250 ms of auditory processing in two Go/NoGo tasks differing in target probability. ERP data related to each task were acquired from 60 healthy young adults (M = 20.4, SD = 3.1 years). Temporal principal components analyses were used to decompose ERP data in each task. Statistical analyses compared component amplitudes between stimulus type (Go vs. NoGo) and probability (High vs. Low). Neuronal source localisation was also conducted for each component. Processing Negativity was not evident; however, P1, N1a, N1b, and N1c were identified in each task, with Go P2 and NoGo N2b. The absence of Processing Negativity in this study indicated that young adults do not proactively process targets to complete the Go/NoGo task and/or questioned Processing Negativity’s conceptualisation. Additional analyses revealed stimulus-specific processing as early as P1, and outlined a complex network of active neuronal sources underlying each component, providing useful insight into Go and NoGo information processing in young adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7055275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70552752020-03-12 The First 250 ms of Auditory Processing: No Evidence of Early Processing Negativity in the Go/NoGo Task Fogarty, Jack S. Barry, Robert J. Steiner, Genevieve Z. Sci Rep Article Past evidence of an early Processing Negativity in auditory Go/NoGo event-related potential (ERP) data suggests that young adults proactively process sensory information in two-choice tasks. This study aimed to clarify the occurrence of Go/NoGo Processing Negativity and investigate the ERP component series related to the first 250 ms of auditory processing in two Go/NoGo tasks differing in target probability. ERP data related to each task were acquired from 60 healthy young adults (M = 20.4, SD = 3.1 years). Temporal principal components analyses were used to decompose ERP data in each task. Statistical analyses compared component amplitudes between stimulus type (Go vs. NoGo) and probability (High vs. Low). Neuronal source localisation was also conducted for each component. Processing Negativity was not evident; however, P1, N1a, N1b, and N1c were identified in each task, with Go P2 and NoGo N2b. The absence of Processing Negativity in this study indicated that young adults do not proactively process targets to complete the Go/NoGo task and/or questioned Processing Negativity’s conceptualisation. Additional analyses revealed stimulus-specific processing as early as P1, and outlined a complex network of active neuronal sources underlying each component, providing useful insight into Go and NoGo information processing in young adults. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7055275/ /pubmed/32132630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61060-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Fogarty, Jack S.
Barry, Robert J.
Steiner, Genevieve Z.
The First 250 ms of Auditory Processing: No Evidence of Early Processing Negativity in the Go/NoGo Task
title The First 250 ms of Auditory Processing: No Evidence of Early Processing Negativity in the Go/NoGo Task
title_full The First 250 ms of Auditory Processing: No Evidence of Early Processing Negativity in the Go/NoGo Task
title_fullStr The First 250 ms of Auditory Processing: No Evidence of Early Processing Negativity in the Go/NoGo Task
title_full_unstemmed The First 250 ms of Auditory Processing: No Evidence of Early Processing Negativity in the Go/NoGo Task
title_short The First 250 ms of Auditory Processing: No Evidence of Early Processing Negativity in the Go/NoGo Task
title_sort first 250 ms of auditory processing: no evidence of early processing negativity in the go/nogo task
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7055275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32132630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61060-9
work_keys_str_mv AT fogartyjacks thefirst250msofauditoryprocessingnoevidenceofearlyprocessingnegativityinthegonogotask
AT barryrobertj thefirst250msofauditoryprocessingnoevidenceofearlyprocessingnegativityinthegonogotask
AT steinergenevievez thefirst250msofauditoryprocessingnoevidenceofearlyprocessingnegativityinthegonogotask
AT fogartyjacks first250msofauditoryprocessingnoevidenceofearlyprocessingnegativityinthegonogotask
AT barryrobertj first250msofauditoryprocessingnoevidenceofearlyprocessingnegativityinthegonogotask
AT steinergenevievez first250msofauditoryprocessingnoevidenceofearlyprocessingnegativityinthegonogotask