Cargando…

Optimal endoscopy timing in patients with acute variceal bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Although current guidelines recommend performing endoscopy within 12 hours for acute variceal bleeding (AVB), the optimal timing remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the effect of endoscopy timing on the mortality and rebleeding rates in AVB through a systematic review and meta-analysis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jung, Da Hyun, Huh, Cheal Wung, Kim, Na Jin, Kim, Byung-Wook
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7055310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32132589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60866-x
_version_ 1783503349742567424
author Jung, Da Hyun
Huh, Cheal Wung
Kim, Na Jin
Kim, Byung-Wook
author_facet Jung, Da Hyun
Huh, Cheal Wung
Kim, Na Jin
Kim, Byung-Wook
author_sort Jung, Da Hyun
collection PubMed
description Although current guidelines recommend performing endoscopy within 12 hours for acute variceal bleeding (AVB), the optimal timing remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the effect of endoscopy timing on the mortality and rebleeding rates in AVB through a systematic review and meta-analysis of all eligible studies. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched for relevant publications up to January 2019. Overall mortality, rebleeding rate, and other clinical outcomes were determined. For the non-randomized studies, the risk of bias assessment tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included publications. The Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model of the RevMan software (Cochrane) and the inverse variance method were used to analyse binary end points and continuous outcomes, respectively. This meta-analysis included five studies with 854 and 453 participants who underwent urgent (≤12 hours) and non-urgent endoscopies (>12 hours), respectively. All the included studies were retrospective in nature, because of obvious ethical issues. No significant differences in the severity indexes were found between the urgent and non-urgent groups. Three studies showed 6-week mortality and the others in-hospital mortality as main outcomes. No significant difference in overall mortality rate was found between the groups (odds ratio [OR]: 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36–1.45, p = 0.36). The rebleeding rate was similar between the two groups (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.76–1.93, p = 0.41). Other outcomes such as successful haemostasis, need for salvage therapy, length of hospital stay, and number of blood transfusions were also similar between the groups. We demonstrated that endoscopy timing does not affect the mortality or rebleeding rate of patients with AVB. Therefore, an appropriate timing of endoscopy would be more important than an urgent endoscopy depending on each patient’s condition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7055310
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70553102020-03-12 Optimal endoscopy timing in patients with acute variceal bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis Jung, Da Hyun Huh, Cheal Wung Kim, Na Jin Kim, Byung-Wook Sci Rep Article Although current guidelines recommend performing endoscopy within 12 hours for acute variceal bleeding (AVB), the optimal timing remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the effect of endoscopy timing on the mortality and rebleeding rates in AVB through a systematic review and meta-analysis of all eligible studies. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched for relevant publications up to January 2019. Overall mortality, rebleeding rate, and other clinical outcomes were determined. For the non-randomized studies, the risk of bias assessment tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included publications. The Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model of the RevMan software (Cochrane) and the inverse variance method were used to analyse binary end points and continuous outcomes, respectively. This meta-analysis included five studies with 854 and 453 participants who underwent urgent (≤12 hours) and non-urgent endoscopies (>12 hours), respectively. All the included studies were retrospective in nature, because of obvious ethical issues. No significant differences in the severity indexes were found between the urgent and non-urgent groups. Three studies showed 6-week mortality and the others in-hospital mortality as main outcomes. No significant difference in overall mortality rate was found between the groups (odds ratio [OR]: 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36–1.45, p = 0.36). The rebleeding rate was similar between the two groups (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.76–1.93, p = 0.41). Other outcomes such as successful haemostasis, need for salvage therapy, length of hospital stay, and number of blood transfusions were also similar between the groups. We demonstrated that endoscopy timing does not affect the mortality or rebleeding rate of patients with AVB. Therefore, an appropriate timing of endoscopy would be more important than an urgent endoscopy depending on each patient’s condition. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7055310/ /pubmed/32132589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60866-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Jung, Da Hyun
Huh, Cheal Wung
Kim, Na Jin
Kim, Byung-Wook
Optimal endoscopy timing in patients with acute variceal bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Optimal endoscopy timing in patients with acute variceal bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Optimal endoscopy timing in patients with acute variceal bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Optimal endoscopy timing in patients with acute variceal bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Optimal endoscopy timing in patients with acute variceal bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Optimal endoscopy timing in patients with acute variceal bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort optimal endoscopy timing in patients with acute variceal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7055310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32132589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60866-x
work_keys_str_mv AT jungdahyun optimalendoscopytiminginpatientswithacutevaricealbleedingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huhchealwung optimalendoscopytiminginpatientswithacutevaricealbleedingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kimnajin optimalendoscopytiminginpatientswithacutevaricealbleedingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kimbyungwook optimalendoscopytiminginpatientswithacutevaricealbleedingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis