Cargando…

Comparison of Housing First and Traditional Homeless Service Users in Eight European Countries: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Multi-Site Study

BACKGROUND: Homeless services expend considerable resources to provide for service users’ most basic needs, such as food and shelter, but their track record for ending homelessness is disappointing. An alternative model, Housing First, reversed the order of services so that homeless individuals are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greenwood, Ronni Michelle, Manning, Rachel M, O'Shaughnessy, Branagh R, Cross, Oisin, Vargas-Moniz, Maria J, Auquier, Pascal, Santinello, Massimo, Wolf, Judith R, Bokszczanin, Anna, Bernad, Roberto, Källmén, Håkan, Spinnewijn, Frederik, Ornelas, José
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7055843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32022696
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14584
_version_ 1783503432703803392
author Greenwood, Ronni Michelle
Manning, Rachel M
O'Shaughnessy, Branagh R
Cross, Oisin
Vargas-Moniz, Maria J
Auquier, Pascal
Santinello, Massimo
Wolf, Judith R
Bokszczanin, Anna
Bernad, Roberto
Källmén, Håkan
Spinnewijn, Frederik
Ornelas, José
author_facet Greenwood, Ronni Michelle
Manning, Rachel M
O'Shaughnessy, Branagh R
Cross, Oisin
Vargas-Moniz, Maria J
Auquier, Pascal
Santinello, Massimo
Wolf, Judith R
Bokszczanin, Anna
Bernad, Roberto
Källmén, Håkan
Spinnewijn, Frederik
Ornelas, José
author_sort Greenwood, Ronni Michelle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Homeless services expend considerable resources to provide for service users’ most basic needs, such as food and shelter, but their track record for ending homelessness is disappointing. An alternative model, Housing First, reversed the order of services so that homeless individuals are offered immediate access to independent housing, with wraparound supports but no treatment or abstinence requirements. Although the evidence base for Housing First’s effectiveness in ending homelessness is robust, less is known about its effectiveness in promoting recovery. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this research is to compare rehabilitation- and recovery-related outcomes of homeless services users who are engaged in either Housing First or traditional staircase services in eight European countries: France, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden. METHODS: A mixed methods, multi-site investigation of Housing First and traditional services will compare quantitative outcomes at two time points. Key rehabilitation outcomes include stable housing and psychiatric symptoms. Key growth outcomes include community integration and acquired capabilities. Semistructured interviews will be used to examine service users’ experiences of environmental constraints and affordances on acquired capabilities to identify features of homeless services that enhance service users’ capabilities sets. Multi-level modelling will be used to test for group differences—Housing First versus traditional services—on key outcome variables. Thematic analysis will be used to understand the ways in which service users make sense of internal and external affordances and constraints on capabilities. RESULTS: The study is registered with the European Commission (registration number: H2020-SC6-REVINEQUAL-2016/ GA726997). Two press releases, a research report to the funding body, two peer-reviewed articles, and an e-book chapter are planned for dissemination of the final results. The project was funded from September 2016 through September 2019. Expected results will be disseminated in 2019 and 2020. CONCLUSIONS: We will use the findings from this research to formulate recommendations for European social policy on the configuration of homeless services and the scaling up and scaling out of Housing First programs. From our findings, we will draw conclusions about the setting features that promote individuals’ exits from homelessness, rehabilitation, and recovery. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/14584
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7055843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70558432020-03-16 Comparison of Housing First and Traditional Homeless Service Users in Eight European Countries: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Multi-Site Study Greenwood, Ronni Michelle Manning, Rachel M O'Shaughnessy, Branagh R Cross, Oisin Vargas-Moniz, Maria J Auquier, Pascal Santinello, Massimo Wolf, Judith R Bokszczanin, Anna Bernad, Roberto Källmén, Håkan Spinnewijn, Frederik Ornelas, José JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: Homeless services expend considerable resources to provide for service users’ most basic needs, such as food and shelter, but their track record for ending homelessness is disappointing. An alternative model, Housing First, reversed the order of services so that homeless individuals are offered immediate access to independent housing, with wraparound supports but no treatment or abstinence requirements. Although the evidence base for Housing First’s effectiveness in ending homelessness is robust, less is known about its effectiveness in promoting recovery. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this research is to compare rehabilitation- and recovery-related outcomes of homeless services users who are engaged in either Housing First or traditional staircase services in eight European countries: France, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden. METHODS: A mixed methods, multi-site investigation of Housing First and traditional services will compare quantitative outcomes at two time points. Key rehabilitation outcomes include stable housing and psychiatric symptoms. Key growth outcomes include community integration and acquired capabilities. Semistructured interviews will be used to examine service users’ experiences of environmental constraints and affordances on acquired capabilities to identify features of homeless services that enhance service users’ capabilities sets. Multi-level modelling will be used to test for group differences—Housing First versus traditional services—on key outcome variables. Thematic analysis will be used to understand the ways in which service users make sense of internal and external affordances and constraints on capabilities. RESULTS: The study is registered with the European Commission (registration number: H2020-SC6-REVINEQUAL-2016/ GA726997). Two press releases, a research report to the funding body, two peer-reviewed articles, and an e-book chapter are planned for dissemination of the final results. The project was funded from September 2016 through September 2019. Expected results will be disseminated in 2019 and 2020. CONCLUSIONS: We will use the findings from this research to formulate recommendations for European social policy on the configuration of homeless services and the scaling up and scaling out of Housing First programs. From our findings, we will draw conclusions about the setting features that promote individuals’ exits from homelessness, rehabilitation, and recovery. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/14584 JMIR Publications 2020-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7055843/ /pubmed/32022696 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14584 Text en ©Ronni Michelle Greenwood, Rachel M Manning, Branagh R O'Shaughnessy, Oisin Cross, Maria J Vargas-Moniz, Pascal Auquier, Massimo Santinello, Judith R Wolf, Anna Bokszczanin, Roberto Bernad, Håkan Källmén, Frederik Spinnewijn, José Ornelas, HOME_EU Consortium. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 05.02.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
Greenwood, Ronni Michelle
Manning, Rachel M
O'Shaughnessy, Branagh R
Cross, Oisin
Vargas-Moniz, Maria J
Auquier, Pascal
Santinello, Massimo
Wolf, Judith R
Bokszczanin, Anna
Bernad, Roberto
Källmén, Håkan
Spinnewijn, Frederik
Ornelas, José
Comparison of Housing First and Traditional Homeless Service Users in Eight European Countries: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Multi-Site Study
title Comparison of Housing First and Traditional Homeless Service Users in Eight European Countries: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Multi-Site Study
title_full Comparison of Housing First and Traditional Homeless Service Users in Eight European Countries: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Multi-Site Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Housing First and Traditional Homeless Service Users in Eight European Countries: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Multi-Site Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Housing First and Traditional Homeless Service Users in Eight European Countries: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Multi-Site Study
title_short Comparison of Housing First and Traditional Homeless Service Users in Eight European Countries: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Multi-Site Study
title_sort comparison of housing first and traditional homeless service users in eight european countries: protocol for a mixed methods, multi-site study
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7055843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32022696
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14584
work_keys_str_mv AT greenwoodronnimichelle comparisonofhousingfirstandtraditionalhomelessserviceusersineighteuropeancountriesprotocolforamixedmethodsmultisitestudy
AT manningrachelm comparisonofhousingfirstandtraditionalhomelessserviceusersineighteuropeancountriesprotocolforamixedmethodsmultisitestudy
AT oshaughnessybranaghr comparisonofhousingfirstandtraditionalhomelessserviceusersineighteuropeancountriesprotocolforamixedmethodsmultisitestudy
AT crossoisin comparisonofhousingfirstandtraditionalhomelessserviceusersineighteuropeancountriesprotocolforamixedmethodsmultisitestudy
AT vargasmonizmariaj comparisonofhousingfirstandtraditionalhomelessserviceusersineighteuropeancountriesprotocolforamixedmethodsmultisitestudy
AT auquierpascal comparisonofhousingfirstandtraditionalhomelessserviceusersineighteuropeancountriesprotocolforamixedmethodsmultisitestudy
AT santinellomassimo comparisonofhousingfirstandtraditionalhomelessserviceusersineighteuropeancountriesprotocolforamixedmethodsmultisitestudy
AT wolfjudithr comparisonofhousingfirstandtraditionalhomelessserviceusersineighteuropeancountriesprotocolforamixedmethodsmultisitestudy
AT bokszczaninanna comparisonofhousingfirstandtraditionalhomelessserviceusersineighteuropeancountriesprotocolforamixedmethodsmultisitestudy
AT bernadroberto comparisonofhousingfirstandtraditionalhomelessserviceusersineighteuropeancountriesprotocolforamixedmethodsmultisitestudy
AT kallmenhakan comparisonofhousingfirstandtraditionalhomelessserviceusersineighteuropeancountriesprotocolforamixedmethodsmultisitestudy
AT spinnewijnfrederik comparisonofhousingfirstandtraditionalhomelessserviceusersineighteuropeancountriesprotocolforamixedmethodsmultisitestudy
AT ornelasjose comparisonofhousingfirstandtraditionalhomelessserviceusersineighteuropeancountriesprotocolforamixedmethodsmultisitestudy
AT comparisonofhousingfirstandtraditionalhomelessserviceusersineighteuropeancountriesprotocolforamixedmethodsmultisitestudy