Cargando…
Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation
OBJECTIVE: To translate the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale (SRMS), developed to evaluate the motivation level of stroke patients during rehabilitation, into the Korean language and to verify the reliability and validity of the Korean version of SRMS (K-SRMS). METHODS: The K-SRMS was develope...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7056334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32130835 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2020.44.1.11 |
_version_ | 1783503473363386368 |
---|---|
author | Park, Mina Lee, Ji-Yeong Ham, Yeajin Oh, Sang-Wook Shin, Joon-Ho |
author_facet | Park, Mina Lee, Ji-Yeong Ham, Yeajin Oh, Sang-Wook Shin, Joon-Ho |
author_sort | Park, Mina |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To translate the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale (SRMS), developed to evaluate the motivation level of stroke patients during rehabilitation, into the Korean language and to verify the reliability and validity of the Korean version of SRMS (K-SRMS). METHODS: The K-SRMS was developed following a structured process that included translation, verification, compromise assessment, reverse translation, feedback, and final correction. K-SRMS reliability was evaluated by performing internal consistency and test–retest analyses. The reliability test was conducted in 50 stroke patients. Its validity was assessed by comparing the K-SRMS with the scale and performing exploratory factor analysis. The validity test was conducted in 102 stroke patients. RESULTS: The test–retest analysis showed good reliability, and the internal consistency of the K-SRMS was similar to that of the original version for all, except 4, items. Thus, these 4 items were excluded, and then the validity test was conducted. Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated that the K-SRMS score was significantly correlated with the BAS total score (Pearson r=0.207, p<0.05). In the exploratory factor analysis, K-SRMS items were categorized into 7 groups (factors), and factors 1 and 4 showed mutual concordance with K-SRMS subscales, including intrinsic motivation factors and amotivation, respectively. CONCLUSION: The newly developed K-SRMS showed good reliability and validity. It could also be used as a tool to objectify the degree of motivation for rehabilitation among stroke patients in clinical care and research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7056334 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70563342020-03-11 Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation Park, Mina Lee, Ji-Yeong Ham, Yeajin Oh, Sang-Wook Shin, Joon-Ho Ann Rehabil Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: To translate the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale (SRMS), developed to evaluate the motivation level of stroke patients during rehabilitation, into the Korean language and to verify the reliability and validity of the Korean version of SRMS (K-SRMS). METHODS: The K-SRMS was developed following a structured process that included translation, verification, compromise assessment, reverse translation, feedback, and final correction. K-SRMS reliability was evaluated by performing internal consistency and test–retest analyses. The reliability test was conducted in 50 stroke patients. Its validity was assessed by comparing the K-SRMS with the scale and performing exploratory factor analysis. The validity test was conducted in 102 stroke patients. RESULTS: The test–retest analysis showed good reliability, and the internal consistency of the K-SRMS was similar to that of the original version for all, except 4, items. Thus, these 4 items were excluded, and then the validity test was conducted. Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated that the K-SRMS score was significantly correlated with the BAS total score (Pearson r=0.207, p<0.05). In the exploratory factor analysis, K-SRMS items were categorized into 7 groups (factors), and factors 1 and 4 showed mutual concordance with K-SRMS subscales, including intrinsic motivation factors and amotivation, respectively. CONCLUSION: The newly developed K-SRMS showed good reliability and validity. It could also be used as a tool to objectify the degree of motivation for rehabilitation among stroke patients in clinical care and research. Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2020-02 2020-02-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7056334/ /pubmed/32130835 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2020.44.1.11 Text en Copyright © 2020 by Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Park, Mina Lee, Ji-Yeong Ham, Yeajin Oh, Sang-Wook Shin, Joon-Ho Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation |
title | Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation |
title_full | Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation |
title_fullStr | Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation |
title_short | Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation |
title_sort | korean version of the stroke rehabilitation motivation scale: reliability and validity evaluation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7056334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32130835 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2020.44.1.11 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkmina koreanversionofthestrokerehabilitationmotivationscalereliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT leejiyeong koreanversionofthestrokerehabilitationmotivationscalereliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT hamyeajin koreanversionofthestrokerehabilitationmotivationscalereliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT ohsangwook koreanversionofthestrokerehabilitationmotivationscalereliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT shinjoonho koreanversionofthestrokerehabilitationmotivationscalereliabilityandvalidityevaluation |