Cargando…

Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation

OBJECTIVE: To translate the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale (SRMS), developed to evaluate the motivation level of stroke patients during rehabilitation, into the Korean language and to verify the reliability and validity of the Korean version of SRMS (K-SRMS). METHODS: The K-SRMS was develope...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Mina, Lee, Ji-Yeong, Ham, Yeajin, Oh, Sang-Wook, Shin, Joon-Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7056334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32130835
http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2020.44.1.11
_version_ 1783503473363386368
author Park, Mina
Lee, Ji-Yeong
Ham, Yeajin
Oh, Sang-Wook
Shin, Joon-Ho
author_facet Park, Mina
Lee, Ji-Yeong
Ham, Yeajin
Oh, Sang-Wook
Shin, Joon-Ho
author_sort Park, Mina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To translate the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale (SRMS), developed to evaluate the motivation level of stroke patients during rehabilitation, into the Korean language and to verify the reliability and validity of the Korean version of SRMS (K-SRMS). METHODS: The K-SRMS was developed following a structured process that included translation, verification, compromise assessment, reverse translation, feedback, and final correction. K-SRMS reliability was evaluated by performing internal consistency and test–retest analyses. The reliability test was conducted in 50 stroke patients. Its validity was assessed by comparing the K-SRMS with the scale and performing exploratory factor analysis. The validity test was conducted in 102 stroke patients. RESULTS: The test–retest analysis showed good reliability, and the internal consistency of the K-SRMS was similar to that of the original version for all, except 4, items. Thus, these 4 items were excluded, and then the validity test was conducted. Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated that the K-SRMS score was significantly correlated with the BAS total score (Pearson r=0.207, p<0.05). In the exploratory factor analysis, K-SRMS items were categorized into 7 groups (factors), and factors 1 and 4 showed mutual concordance with K-SRMS subscales, including intrinsic motivation factors and amotivation, respectively. CONCLUSION: The newly developed K-SRMS showed good reliability and validity. It could also be used as a tool to objectify the degree of motivation for rehabilitation among stroke patients in clinical care and research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7056334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70563342020-03-11 Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation Park, Mina Lee, Ji-Yeong Ham, Yeajin Oh, Sang-Wook Shin, Joon-Ho Ann Rehabil Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: To translate the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale (SRMS), developed to evaluate the motivation level of stroke patients during rehabilitation, into the Korean language and to verify the reliability and validity of the Korean version of SRMS (K-SRMS). METHODS: The K-SRMS was developed following a structured process that included translation, verification, compromise assessment, reverse translation, feedback, and final correction. K-SRMS reliability was evaluated by performing internal consistency and test–retest analyses. The reliability test was conducted in 50 stroke patients. Its validity was assessed by comparing the K-SRMS with the scale and performing exploratory factor analysis. The validity test was conducted in 102 stroke patients. RESULTS: The test–retest analysis showed good reliability, and the internal consistency of the K-SRMS was similar to that of the original version for all, except 4, items. Thus, these 4 items were excluded, and then the validity test was conducted. Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated that the K-SRMS score was significantly correlated with the BAS total score (Pearson r=0.207, p<0.05). In the exploratory factor analysis, K-SRMS items were categorized into 7 groups (factors), and factors 1 and 4 showed mutual concordance with K-SRMS subscales, including intrinsic motivation factors and amotivation, respectively. CONCLUSION: The newly developed K-SRMS showed good reliability and validity. It could also be used as a tool to objectify the degree of motivation for rehabilitation among stroke patients in clinical care and research. Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2020-02 2020-02-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7056334/ /pubmed/32130835 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2020.44.1.11 Text en Copyright © 2020 by Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Park, Mina
Lee, Ji-Yeong
Ham, Yeajin
Oh, Sang-Wook
Shin, Joon-Ho
Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation
title Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation
title_full Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation
title_fullStr Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation
title_short Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation
title_sort korean version of the stroke rehabilitation motivation scale: reliability and validity evaluation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7056334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32130835
http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2020.44.1.11
work_keys_str_mv AT parkmina koreanversionofthestrokerehabilitationmotivationscalereliabilityandvalidityevaluation
AT leejiyeong koreanversionofthestrokerehabilitationmotivationscalereliabilityandvalidityevaluation
AT hamyeajin koreanversionofthestrokerehabilitationmotivationscalereliabilityandvalidityevaluation
AT ohsangwook koreanversionofthestrokerehabilitationmotivationscalereliabilityandvalidityevaluation
AT shinjoonho koreanversionofthestrokerehabilitationmotivationscalereliabilityandvalidityevaluation