Cargando…
Worlds apart or two sides of the same coin? Attitudes, meanings, and motives of potential oocyte and sperm donors in Austria
PURPOSE: Gamete donors and recipients of such donations have been explored by previous studies, which mostly focus on post-donation scenarios. Our study analyses the general willingness to donate oocytes or sperm and focuses on differences between potential female and male donors in attitudes, meani...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7056682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31916077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01683-8 |
_version_ | 1783503516602466304 |
---|---|
author | Flatscher-Thöni, M. Böttcher, B. Geser, W. Lampe, A. Werner-Felmayer, G. Voithofer, C. Schusterschitz, C. |
author_facet | Flatscher-Thöni, M. Böttcher, B. Geser, W. Lampe, A. Werner-Felmayer, G. Voithofer, C. Schusterschitz, C. |
author_sort | Flatscher-Thöni, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Gamete donors and recipients of such donations have been explored by previous studies, which mostly focus on post-donation scenarios. Our study analyses the general willingness to donate oocytes or sperm and focuses on differences between potential female and male donors in attitudes, meanings, and motives in a pre-donation setting. METHODS: An electronic survey (n = 555 students) was used in this anonymous observational study. To enable comparisons between men and women regarding their attitudes, meanings, and motives and their willingness to donate gametes, we designed two separate questionnaires. RESULTS: The sample was divided into three groups based on the willingness to donate: potential donors (n = 133; women: 48.1%, men: 51.9%); doubtful donors (n = 207; women: 75.8%, men: 24.2%); and non-donors (n = 215; women: 68.3%, men: 31.7%). The group of potential male donors (39.2%) was significantly larger than the group of potential female donors (16.9%). Significant differences regarding altruism, the meaning of one’s self-worth, and passing on the own genes were found between doubtful and potential donors. Potential donors attached less value to altruism but more value to the enhancement of one’s self-worth and passing on one’s genes than doubtful donors. The motive of passing on one’s genes and altruistic motives were more important to men than to women. CONCLUSION: This study helps to create a better understanding of potential donors in the existing donation framework and supports the evaluation of the given regimes in the context of designing an improved framework. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7056682 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70566822020-03-16 Worlds apart or two sides of the same coin? Attitudes, meanings, and motives of potential oocyte and sperm donors in Austria Flatscher-Thöni, M. Böttcher, B. Geser, W. Lampe, A. Werner-Felmayer, G. Voithofer, C. Schusterschitz, C. J Assist Reprod Genet Assisted Reproduction Technologies PURPOSE: Gamete donors and recipients of such donations have been explored by previous studies, which mostly focus on post-donation scenarios. Our study analyses the general willingness to donate oocytes or sperm and focuses on differences between potential female and male donors in attitudes, meanings, and motives in a pre-donation setting. METHODS: An electronic survey (n = 555 students) was used in this anonymous observational study. To enable comparisons between men and women regarding their attitudes, meanings, and motives and their willingness to donate gametes, we designed two separate questionnaires. RESULTS: The sample was divided into three groups based on the willingness to donate: potential donors (n = 133; women: 48.1%, men: 51.9%); doubtful donors (n = 207; women: 75.8%, men: 24.2%); and non-donors (n = 215; women: 68.3%, men: 31.7%). The group of potential male donors (39.2%) was significantly larger than the group of potential female donors (16.9%). Significant differences regarding altruism, the meaning of one’s self-worth, and passing on the own genes were found between doubtful and potential donors. Potential donors attached less value to altruism but more value to the enhancement of one’s self-worth and passing on one’s genes than doubtful donors. The motive of passing on one’s genes and altruistic motives were more important to men than to women. CONCLUSION: This study helps to create a better understanding of potential donors in the existing donation framework and supports the evaluation of the given regimes in the context of designing an improved framework. Springer US 2020-01-08 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7056682/ /pubmed/31916077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01683-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Assisted Reproduction Technologies Flatscher-Thöni, M. Böttcher, B. Geser, W. Lampe, A. Werner-Felmayer, G. Voithofer, C. Schusterschitz, C. Worlds apart or two sides of the same coin? Attitudes, meanings, and motives of potential oocyte and sperm donors in Austria |
title | Worlds apart or two sides of the same coin? Attitudes, meanings, and motives of potential oocyte and sperm donors in Austria |
title_full | Worlds apart or two sides of the same coin? Attitudes, meanings, and motives of potential oocyte and sperm donors in Austria |
title_fullStr | Worlds apart or two sides of the same coin? Attitudes, meanings, and motives of potential oocyte and sperm donors in Austria |
title_full_unstemmed | Worlds apart or two sides of the same coin? Attitudes, meanings, and motives of potential oocyte and sperm donors in Austria |
title_short | Worlds apart or two sides of the same coin? Attitudes, meanings, and motives of potential oocyte and sperm donors in Austria |
title_sort | worlds apart or two sides of the same coin? attitudes, meanings, and motives of potential oocyte and sperm donors in austria |
topic | Assisted Reproduction Technologies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7056682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31916077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01683-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT flatscherthonim worldsapartortwosidesofthesamecoinattitudesmeaningsandmotivesofpotentialoocyteandspermdonorsinaustria AT bottcherb worldsapartortwosidesofthesamecoinattitudesmeaningsandmotivesofpotentialoocyteandspermdonorsinaustria AT geserw worldsapartortwosidesofthesamecoinattitudesmeaningsandmotivesofpotentialoocyteandspermdonorsinaustria AT lampea worldsapartortwosidesofthesamecoinattitudesmeaningsandmotivesofpotentialoocyteandspermdonorsinaustria AT wernerfelmayerg worldsapartortwosidesofthesamecoinattitudesmeaningsandmotivesofpotentialoocyteandspermdonorsinaustria AT voithoferc worldsapartortwosidesofthesamecoinattitudesmeaningsandmotivesofpotentialoocyteandspermdonorsinaustria AT schusterschitzc worldsapartortwosidesofthesamecoinattitudesmeaningsandmotivesofpotentialoocyteandspermdonorsinaustria |