Cargando…

Comparison of the Biograph Vision and Biograph mCT for quantitative (90)Y PET/CT imaging for radioembolisation

BACKGROUND: New digital PET scanners with improved time of flight timing and extended axial field of view such as the Siemens Biograph Vision have come on the market and are expected to replace current generation photomultiplier tube (PMT)-based systems such as the Siemens Biograph mCT. These replac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kunnen, Britt, Beijst, Casper, Lam, Marnix G. E. H., Viergever, Max A., de Jong, Hugo W. A. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7056802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32130554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-0283-6
_version_ 1783503534619099136
author Kunnen, Britt
Beijst, Casper
Lam, Marnix G. E. H.
Viergever, Max A.
de Jong, Hugo W. A. M.
author_facet Kunnen, Britt
Beijst, Casper
Lam, Marnix G. E. H.
Viergever, Max A.
de Jong, Hugo W. A. M.
author_sort Kunnen, Britt
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: New digital PET scanners with improved time of flight timing and extended axial field of view such as the Siemens Biograph Vision have come on the market and are expected to replace current generation photomultiplier tube (PMT)-based systems such as the Siemens Biograph mCT. These replacements warrant a direct comparison between the systems, so that a smooth transition in clinical practice and research is guaranteed, especially when quantitative values are used for dosimetry-based treatment guidance. The new generation digital PET scanners offer increased sensitivity. This could particularly benefit (90)Y imaging, which tends to be very noisy owing to the small positron branching ratio and high random fraction of (90)Y. This study aims to determine the ideal reconstruction settings for the digital Vision for quantitative (90)Y imaging and to evaluate the image quality and quantification of the digital Vision in comparison with its predecessor, the PMT-based mCT, for (90)Y imaging in radioembolisation procedures. METHODS: The NEMA image quality phantom was scanned to determine the ideal reconstruction settings for the Vision. In addition, an anthropomorphic phantom was scanned with both the Vision and the mCT, mimicking a radioembolisation patient with lung, liver, tumour, and extrahepatic deposition inserts. Image quantification of the anthropomorphic phantom was assessed by the lung shunt fraction, the tumour to non-tumour ratio, the parenchymal dose, and the contrast to noise ratio of extrahepatic depositions. RESULTS: For the Vision, a reconstruction with 3 iterations, 5 subsets, and no post-reconstruction filter is recommended for quantitative (90)Y imaging, based on the convergence of the recovery coefficient. Comparing both systems showed that the noise level of the Vision is significantly lower than that of the mCT (background variability of 14% for the Vision and 25% for the mCT at 2.5·10(3) MBq for the 37 mm sphere size). For quantitative (90)Y measures, such as needed in radioembolisation, both systems perform similarly. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend to reconstruct (90)Y images acquired on the Vision with 3 iterations, 5 subsets, and no post-reconstruction filter for quantitative imaging. The Vision provides a reduced noise level, but similar quantitative accuracy as compared with its predecessor the mCT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7056802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70568022020-03-23 Comparison of the Biograph Vision and Biograph mCT for quantitative (90)Y PET/CT imaging for radioembolisation Kunnen, Britt Beijst, Casper Lam, Marnix G. E. H. Viergever, Max A. de Jong, Hugo W. A. M. EJNMMI Phys Original Research BACKGROUND: New digital PET scanners with improved time of flight timing and extended axial field of view such as the Siemens Biograph Vision have come on the market and are expected to replace current generation photomultiplier tube (PMT)-based systems such as the Siemens Biograph mCT. These replacements warrant a direct comparison between the systems, so that a smooth transition in clinical practice and research is guaranteed, especially when quantitative values are used for dosimetry-based treatment guidance. The new generation digital PET scanners offer increased sensitivity. This could particularly benefit (90)Y imaging, which tends to be very noisy owing to the small positron branching ratio and high random fraction of (90)Y. This study aims to determine the ideal reconstruction settings for the digital Vision for quantitative (90)Y imaging and to evaluate the image quality and quantification of the digital Vision in comparison with its predecessor, the PMT-based mCT, for (90)Y imaging in radioembolisation procedures. METHODS: The NEMA image quality phantom was scanned to determine the ideal reconstruction settings for the Vision. In addition, an anthropomorphic phantom was scanned with both the Vision and the mCT, mimicking a radioembolisation patient with lung, liver, tumour, and extrahepatic deposition inserts. Image quantification of the anthropomorphic phantom was assessed by the lung shunt fraction, the tumour to non-tumour ratio, the parenchymal dose, and the contrast to noise ratio of extrahepatic depositions. RESULTS: For the Vision, a reconstruction with 3 iterations, 5 subsets, and no post-reconstruction filter is recommended for quantitative (90)Y imaging, based on the convergence of the recovery coefficient. Comparing both systems showed that the noise level of the Vision is significantly lower than that of the mCT (background variability of 14% for the Vision and 25% for the mCT at 2.5·10(3) MBq for the 37 mm sphere size). For quantitative (90)Y measures, such as needed in radioembolisation, both systems perform similarly. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend to reconstruct (90)Y images acquired on the Vision with 3 iterations, 5 subsets, and no post-reconstruction filter for quantitative imaging. The Vision provides a reduced noise level, but similar quantitative accuracy as compared with its predecessor the mCT. Springer International Publishing 2020-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7056802/ /pubmed/32130554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-0283-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kunnen, Britt
Beijst, Casper
Lam, Marnix G. E. H.
Viergever, Max A.
de Jong, Hugo W. A. M.
Comparison of the Biograph Vision and Biograph mCT for quantitative (90)Y PET/CT imaging for radioembolisation
title Comparison of the Biograph Vision and Biograph mCT for quantitative (90)Y PET/CT imaging for radioembolisation
title_full Comparison of the Biograph Vision and Biograph mCT for quantitative (90)Y PET/CT imaging for radioembolisation
title_fullStr Comparison of the Biograph Vision and Biograph mCT for quantitative (90)Y PET/CT imaging for radioembolisation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Biograph Vision and Biograph mCT for quantitative (90)Y PET/CT imaging for radioembolisation
title_short Comparison of the Biograph Vision and Biograph mCT for quantitative (90)Y PET/CT imaging for radioembolisation
title_sort comparison of the biograph vision and biograph mct for quantitative (90)y pet/ct imaging for radioembolisation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7056802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32130554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-0283-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kunnenbritt comparisonofthebiographvisionandbiographmctforquantitative90ypetctimagingforradioembolisation
AT beijstcasper comparisonofthebiographvisionandbiographmctforquantitative90ypetctimagingforradioembolisation
AT lammarnixgeh comparisonofthebiographvisionandbiographmctforquantitative90ypetctimagingforradioembolisation
AT viergevermaxa comparisonofthebiographvisionandbiographmctforquantitative90ypetctimagingforradioembolisation
AT dejonghugowam comparisonofthebiographvisionandbiographmctforquantitative90ypetctimagingforradioembolisation