Cargando…

Risk factors for stomach cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: This report provides information on 14 behavioral and nutritional factors that can be addressed in stomach cancer prevention programs. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched through December 2018. Reference lists were also screened. Observational studies addressing the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poorolajal, Jalal, Moradi, Leila, Mohammadi, Younes, Cheraghi, Zahra, Gohari-Ensaf, Fatemeh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Epidemiology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7056944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32023777
http://dx.doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2020004
_version_ 1783503565098057728
author Poorolajal, Jalal
Moradi, Leila
Mohammadi, Younes
Cheraghi, Zahra
Gohari-Ensaf, Fatemeh
author_facet Poorolajal, Jalal
Moradi, Leila
Mohammadi, Younes
Cheraghi, Zahra
Gohari-Ensaf, Fatemeh
author_sort Poorolajal, Jalal
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This report provides information on 14 behavioral and nutritional factors that can be addressed in stomach cancer prevention programs. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched through December 2018. Reference lists were also screened. Observational studies addressing the associations between stomach cancer and behavioral factors were analyzed. Between-study heterogeneity was investigated using the χ(2), τ(2), and I(2) statistics. The likelihood of publication bias was explored using the Begg and Egger tests and trim-and-fill analysis. Effect sizes were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Of 52,916 identified studies, 232 (including 33,831,063 participants) were eligible. The OR (95% CI) of factors associated with stomach cancer were as follows: Helicobacter pylori infection, 2.56 (95% CI, 2.18 to 3.00); current smoking, 1.61 (95% CI, 1.49 to 1.75); former smoking 1.43 (95% CI, 1.29 to 1.59); current drinking, 1.19 (95% CI, 1.10 to 1.29); former drinking, 1.73 (95% CI, 1.17 to 2.56); overweight/obesity, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.08); sufficient physical activity, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.68 to 1.02); consumption of fruits ≥3 times/wk, 0.48 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.63); consumption of vegetables ≥3 times/wk, 0.62 (95% CI, 0.49 to 0.79); eating pickled vegetables, 1.28 (95% CI, 1.09 to 1.51); drinking black tea, 1.00 (95% CI, 0.84 to 1.20); drinking green tea, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80 to 0.97); drinking coffee, 0.99 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.11); eating fish ≥1 time/wk 0.79 (95% CI, 0.61 to 1.03); eating red meat ≥4 times/wk 1.31 (95% CI, 0.87 to 1.96), and high salt intake 3.78 (95% CI, 1.74 to 5.44) and 1.34 (95% CI, 0.88 to 2.03), based on two different studies. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provided a clear picture of the behavioral and nutritional factors associated with the development of stomach cancer. These results may be utilized for ranking and prioritizing preventable risk factors to implement effective prevention programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7056944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Society of Epidemiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70569442020-03-11 Risk factors for stomach cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Poorolajal, Jalal Moradi, Leila Mohammadi, Younes Cheraghi, Zahra Gohari-Ensaf, Fatemeh Epidemiol Health Systematic Review OBJECTIVES: This report provides information on 14 behavioral and nutritional factors that can be addressed in stomach cancer prevention programs. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched through December 2018. Reference lists were also screened. Observational studies addressing the associations between stomach cancer and behavioral factors were analyzed. Between-study heterogeneity was investigated using the χ(2), τ(2), and I(2) statistics. The likelihood of publication bias was explored using the Begg and Egger tests and trim-and-fill analysis. Effect sizes were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Of 52,916 identified studies, 232 (including 33,831,063 participants) were eligible. The OR (95% CI) of factors associated with stomach cancer were as follows: Helicobacter pylori infection, 2.56 (95% CI, 2.18 to 3.00); current smoking, 1.61 (95% CI, 1.49 to 1.75); former smoking 1.43 (95% CI, 1.29 to 1.59); current drinking, 1.19 (95% CI, 1.10 to 1.29); former drinking, 1.73 (95% CI, 1.17 to 2.56); overweight/obesity, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.08); sufficient physical activity, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.68 to 1.02); consumption of fruits ≥3 times/wk, 0.48 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.63); consumption of vegetables ≥3 times/wk, 0.62 (95% CI, 0.49 to 0.79); eating pickled vegetables, 1.28 (95% CI, 1.09 to 1.51); drinking black tea, 1.00 (95% CI, 0.84 to 1.20); drinking green tea, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80 to 0.97); drinking coffee, 0.99 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.11); eating fish ≥1 time/wk 0.79 (95% CI, 0.61 to 1.03); eating red meat ≥4 times/wk 1.31 (95% CI, 0.87 to 1.96), and high salt intake 3.78 (95% CI, 1.74 to 5.44) and 1.34 (95% CI, 0.88 to 2.03), based on two different studies. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provided a clear picture of the behavioral and nutritional factors associated with the development of stomach cancer. These results may be utilized for ranking and prioritizing preventable risk factors to implement effective prevention programs. Korean Society of Epidemiology 2020-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7056944/ /pubmed/32023777 http://dx.doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2020004 Text en ©2020, Korean Society of Epidemiology This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Poorolajal, Jalal
Moradi, Leila
Mohammadi, Younes
Cheraghi, Zahra
Gohari-Ensaf, Fatemeh
Risk factors for stomach cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Risk factors for stomach cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Risk factors for stomach cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Risk factors for stomach cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for stomach cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Risk factors for stomach cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort risk factors for stomach cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7056944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32023777
http://dx.doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2020004
work_keys_str_mv AT poorolajaljalal riskfactorsforstomachcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT moradileila riskfactorsforstomachcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mohammadiyounes riskfactorsforstomachcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cheraghizahra riskfactorsforstomachcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gohariensaffatemeh riskfactorsforstomachcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis