Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Baseline Testing for Resistance-Associated Polymorphisms to Optimize Treatment Outcome in Genotype 1 Noncirrhotic Treatment-Naïve Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus

OBJECTIVES: Direct-acting antivirals containing nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) inhibitors administered over 8 to 12 weeks are effective in ∼95% of patients with hepatitis C virus. Nevertheless, patients resistant to NS5A inhibitors have lower cure rates over 8 weeks (<85%); for these patients, 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fawsitt, Christopher G., Vickerman, Peter, Cooke, Graham S., Welton, Nicky J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7057278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32113623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.08.012
_version_ 1783503627724259328
author Fawsitt, Christopher G.
Vickerman, Peter
Cooke, Graham S.
Welton, Nicky J.
author_facet Fawsitt, Christopher G.
Vickerman, Peter
Cooke, Graham S.
Welton, Nicky J.
author_sort Fawsitt, Christopher G.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Direct-acting antivirals containing nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) inhibitors administered over 8 to 12 weeks are effective in ∼95% of patients with hepatitis C virus. Nevertheless, patients resistant to NS5A inhibitors have lower cure rates over 8 weeks (<85%); for these patients, 12 weeks of treatment produces cure rates greater than 95%. We evaluated the lifetime cost-effectiveness of testing for NS5A resistance at baseline and optimizing treatment duration accordingly in genotype 1 noncirrhotic treatment-naïve patients from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. METHODS: A decision-analytic model compared (1) standard 12-week treatment (no testing), (2) shortened 8-week treatment (no testing), and (3) baseline testing with 12-/8-week treatment for those with/without NS5A polymorphisms. Patients who failed first-line therapy were retreated for 12 weeks. Model inputs were derived from published studies. Costs, quality-adjusted life-years, and the probability of cost-effectiveness were calculated. RESULTS: Baseline testing had an incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) of £11 838 versus standard 12 weeks of therapy (no testing) and low probability (31%) of being the most cost-effective, assuming £30 000 willingness to pay. Shortened 8 weeks of treatment (no testing) had an INMB of £12 294 and the highest probability (69%) of being most cost-effective. Scenario analyses showed baseline testing generally had the highest INMB and probability of being most cost-effective if first- and second-line drug prices were low (<£20k). CONCLUSIONS: Optimizing treatment duration based on NS5A polymorphisms for genotype 1 noncirrhotic treatment-naive patients in the United Kingdom is not cost-effective if the drug costs are high; the strategy is generally most cost-effective when drug prices are low (<£20k).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7057278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70572782020-03-11 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Baseline Testing for Resistance-Associated Polymorphisms to Optimize Treatment Outcome in Genotype 1 Noncirrhotic Treatment-Naïve Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Fawsitt, Christopher G. Vickerman, Peter Cooke, Graham S. Welton, Nicky J. Value Health Article OBJECTIVES: Direct-acting antivirals containing nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) inhibitors administered over 8 to 12 weeks are effective in ∼95% of patients with hepatitis C virus. Nevertheless, patients resistant to NS5A inhibitors have lower cure rates over 8 weeks (<85%); for these patients, 12 weeks of treatment produces cure rates greater than 95%. We evaluated the lifetime cost-effectiveness of testing for NS5A resistance at baseline and optimizing treatment duration accordingly in genotype 1 noncirrhotic treatment-naïve patients from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. METHODS: A decision-analytic model compared (1) standard 12-week treatment (no testing), (2) shortened 8-week treatment (no testing), and (3) baseline testing with 12-/8-week treatment for those with/without NS5A polymorphisms. Patients who failed first-line therapy were retreated for 12 weeks. Model inputs were derived from published studies. Costs, quality-adjusted life-years, and the probability of cost-effectiveness were calculated. RESULTS: Baseline testing had an incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) of £11 838 versus standard 12 weeks of therapy (no testing) and low probability (31%) of being the most cost-effective, assuming £30 000 willingness to pay. Shortened 8 weeks of treatment (no testing) had an INMB of £12 294 and the highest probability (69%) of being most cost-effective. Scenario analyses showed baseline testing generally had the highest INMB and probability of being most cost-effective if first- and second-line drug prices were low (<£20k). CONCLUSIONS: Optimizing treatment duration based on NS5A polymorphisms for genotype 1 noncirrhotic treatment-naive patients in the United Kingdom is not cost-effective if the drug costs are high; the strategy is generally most cost-effective when drug prices are low (<£20k). Elsevier 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7057278/ /pubmed/32113623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.08.012 Text en © 2019 ISPOR-The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fawsitt, Christopher G.
Vickerman, Peter
Cooke, Graham S.
Welton, Nicky J.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Baseline Testing for Resistance-Associated Polymorphisms to Optimize Treatment Outcome in Genotype 1 Noncirrhotic Treatment-Naïve Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus
title Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Baseline Testing for Resistance-Associated Polymorphisms to Optimize Treatment Outcome in Genotype 1 Noncirrhotic Treatment-Naïve Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus
title_full Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Baseline Testing for Resistance-Associated Polymorphisms to Optimize Treatment Outcome in Genotype 1 Noncirrhotic Treatment-Naïve Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Baseline Testing for Resistance-Associated Polymorphisms to Optimize Treatment Outcome in Genotype 1 Noncirrhotic Treatment-Naïve Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Baseline Testing for Resistance-Associated Polymorphisms to Optimize Treatment Outcome in Genotype 1 Noncirrhotic Treatment-Naïve Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus
title_short Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Baseline Testing for Resistance-Associated Polymorphisms to Optimize Treatment Outcome in Genotype 1 Noncirrhotic Treatment-Naïve Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of baseline testing for resistance-associated polymorphisms to optimize treatment outcome in genotype 1 noncirrhotic treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis c virus
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7057278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32113623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.08.012
work_keys_str_mv AT fawsittchristopherg costeffectivenessanalysisofbaselinetestingforresistanceassociatedpolymorphismstooptimizetreatmentoutcomeingenotype1noncirrhotictreatmentnaivepatientswithchronichepatitiscvirus
AT vickermanpeter costeffectivenessanalysisofbaselinetestingforresistanceassociatedpolymorphismstooptimizetreatmentoutcomeingenotype1noncirrhotictreatmentnaivepatientswithchronichepatitiscvirus
AT cookegrahams costeffectivenessanalysisofbaselinetestingforresistanceassociatedpolymorphismstooptimizetreatmentoutcomeingenotype1noncirrhotictreatmentnaivepatientswithchronichepatitiscvirus
AT costeffectivenessanalysisofbaselinetestingforresistanceassociatedpolymorphismstooptimizetreatmentoutcomeingenotype1noncirrhotictreatmentnaivepatientswithchronichepatitiscvirus
AT weltonnickyj costeffectivenessanalysisofbaselinetestingforresistanceassociatedpolymorphismstooptimizetreatmentoutcomeingenotype1noncirrhotictreatmentnaivepatientswithchronichepatitiscvirus