Cargando…
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Baseline Testing for Resistance-Associated Polymorphisms to Optimize Treatment Outcome in Genotype 1 Noncirrhotic Treatment-Naïve Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus
OBJECTIVES: Direct-acting antivirals containing nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) inhibitors administered over 8 to 12 weeks are effective in ∼95% of patients with hepatitis C virus. Nevertheless, patients resistant to NS5A inhibitors have lower cure rates over 8 weeks (<85%); for these patients, 1...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7057278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32113623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.08.012 |
_version_ | 1783503627724259328 |
---|---|
author | Fawsitt, Christopher G. Vickerman, Peter Cooke, Graham S. Welton, Nicky J. |
author_facet | Fawsitt, Christopher G. Vickerman, Peter Cooke, Graham S. Welton, Nicky J. |
author_sort | Fawsitt, Christopher G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Direct-acting antivirals containing nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) inhibitors administered over 8 to 12 weeks are effective in ∼95% of patients with hepatitis C virus. Nevertheless, patients resistant to NS5A inhibitors have lower cure rates over 8 weeks (<85%); for these patients, 12 weeks of treatment produces cure rates greater than 95%. We evaluated the lifetime cost-effectiveness of testing for NS5A resistance at baseline and optimizing treatment duration accordingly in genotype 1 noncirrhotic treatment-naïve patients from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. METHODS: A decision-analytic model compared (1) standard 12-week treatment (no testing), (2) shortened 8-week treatment (no testing), and (3) baseline testing with 12-/8-week treatment for those with/without NS5A polymorphisms. Patients who failed first-line therapy were retreated for 12 weeks. Model inputs were derived from published studies. Costs, quality-adjusted life-years, and the probability of cost-effectiveness were calculated. RESULTS: Baseline testing had an incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) of £11 838 versus standard 12 weeks of therapy (no testing) and low probability (31%) of being the most cost-effective, assuming £30 000 willingness to pay. Shortened 8 weeks of treatment (no testing) had an INMB of £12 294 and the highest probability (69%) of being most cost-effective. Scenario analyses showed baseline testing generally had the highest INMB and probability of being most cost-effective if first- and second-line drug prices were low (<£20k). CONCLUSIONS: Optimizing treatment duration based on NS5A polymorphisms for genotype 1 noncirrhotic treatment-naive patients in the United Kingdom is not cost-effective if the drug costs are high; the strategy is generally most cost-effective when drug prices are low (<£20k). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7057278 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70572782020-03-11 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Baseline Testing for Resistance-Associated Polymorphisms to Optimize Treatment Outcome in Genotype 1 Noncirrhotic Treatment-Naïve Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Fawsitt, Christopher G. Vickerman, Peter Cooke, Graham S. Welton, Nicky J. Value Health Article OBJECTIVES: Direct-acting antivirals containing nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) inhibitors administered over 8 to 12 weeks are effective in ∼95% of patients with hepatitis C virus. Nevertheless, patients resistant to NS5A inhibitors have lower cure rates over 8 weeks (<85%); for these patients, 12 weeks of treatment produces cure rates greater than 95%. We evaluated the lifetime cost-effectiveness of testing for NS5A resistance at baseline and optimizing treatment duration accordingly in genotype 1 noncirrhotic treatment-naïve patients from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. METHODS: A decision-analytic model compared (1) standard 12-week treatment (no testing), (2) shortened 8-week treatment (no testing), and (3) baseline testing with 12-/8-week treatment for those with/without NS5A polymorphisms. Patients who failed first-line therapy were retreated for 12 weeks. Model inputs were derived from published studies. Costs, quality-adjusted life-years, and the probability of cost-effectiveness were calculated. RESULTS: Baseline testing had an incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) of £11 838 versus standard 12 weeks of therapy (no testing) and low probability (31%) of being the most cost-effective, assuming £30 000 willingness to pay. Shortened 8 weeks of treatment (no testing) had an INMB of £12 294 and the highest probability (69%) of being most cost-effective. Scenario analyses showed baseline testing generally had the highest INMB and probability of being most cost-effective if first- and second-line drug prices were low (<£20k). CONCLUSIONS: Optimizing treatment duration based on NS5A polymorphisms for genotype 1 noncirrhotic treatment-naive patients in the United Kingdom is not cost-effective if the drug costs are high; the strategy is generally most cost-effective when drug prices are low (<£20k). Elsevier 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7057278/ /pubmed/32113623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.08.012 Text en © 2019 ISPOR-The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Fawsitt, Christopher G. Vickerman, Peter Cooke, Graham S. Welton, Nicky J. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Baseline Testing for Resistance-Associated Polymorphisms to Optimize Treatment Outcome in Genotype 1 Noncirrhotic Treatment-Naïve Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus |
title | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Baseline Testing for Resistance-Associated Polymorphisms to Optimize Treatment Outcome in Genotype 1 Noncirrhotic Treatment-Naïve Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus |
title_full | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Baseline Testing for Resistance-Associated Polymorphisms to Optimize Treatment Outcome in Genotype 1 Noncirrhotic Treatment-Naïve Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus |
title_fullStr | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Baseline Testing for Resistance-Associated Polymorphisms to Optimize Treatment Outcome in Genotype 1 Noncirrhotic Treatment-Naïve Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Baseline Testing for Resistance-Associated Polymorphisms to Optimize Treatment Outcome in Genotype 1 Noncirrhotic Treatment-Naïve Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus |
title_short | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Baseline Testing for Resistance-Associated Polymorphisms to Optimize Treatment Outcome in Genotype 1 Noncirrhotic Treatment-Naïve Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness analysis of baseline testing for resistance-associated polymorphisms to optimize treatment outcome in genotype 1 noncirrhotic treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis c virus |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7057278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32113623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.08.012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fawsittchristopherg costeffectivenessanalysisofbaselinetestingforresistanceassociatedpolymorphismstooptimizetreatmentoutcomeingenotype1noncirrhotictreatmentnaivepatientswithchronichepatitiscvirus AT vickermanpeter costeffectivenessanalysisofbaselinetestingforresistanceassociatedpolymorphismstooptimizetreatmentoutcomeingenotype1noncirrhotictreatmentnaivepatientswithchronichepatitiscvirus AT cookegrahams costeffectivenessanalysisofbaselinetestingforresistanceassociatedpolymorphismstooptimizetreatmentoutcomeingenotype1noncirrhotictreatmentnaivepatientswithchronichepatitiscvirus AT costeffectivenessanalysisofbaselinetestingforresistanceassociatedpolymorphismstooptimizetreatmentoutcomeingenotype1noncirrhotictreatmentnaivepatientswithchronichepatitiscvirus AT weltonnickyj costeffectivenessanalysisofbaselinetestingforresistanceassociatedpolymorphismstooptimizetreatmentoutcomeingenotype1noncirrhotictreatmentnaivepatientswithchronichepatitiscvirus |