Cargando…

Propensity score–weighted analysis of chemotherapy after PD-1 inhibitors versus chemotherapy alone in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (WJOG10217L)

BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that chemotherapy after immune checkpoint inhibitors may confer an improved response for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, potential selection bias in such studies has not been addressed. We therefore applied propensity score analysis to investigate the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kato, Ryoji, Hayashi, Hidetoshi, Chiba, Yasutaka, Miyawaki, Eriko, Shimizu, Junichi, Ozaki, Tomohiro, Fujimoto, Daichi, Toyozawa, Ryo, Nakamura, Atsushi, Kozuki, Toshiyuki, Tanaka, Kentaro, Teraoka, Shunsuke, Usui, Kazuhiro, Nishino, Kazumi, Hataji, Osamu, Ota, Keiichi, Ebi, Noriyuki, Saeki, Sho, Akazawa, Yuki, Okuno, Motoyasu, Yamamoto, Nobuyuki, Nakagawa, Kazuhiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7057433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32066647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2019-000350
_version_ 1783503657416785920
author Kato, Ryoji
Hayashi, Hidetoshi
Chiba, Yasutaka
Miyawaki, Eriko
Shimizu, Junichi
Ozaki, Tomohiro
Fujimoto, Daichi
Toyozawa, Ryo
Nakamura, Atsushi
Kozuki, Toshiyuki
Tanaka, Kentaro
Teraoka, Shunsuke
Usui, Kazuhiro
Nishino, Kazumi
Hataji, Osamu
Ota, Keiichi
Ebi, Noriyuki
Saeki, Sho
Akazawa, Yuki
Okuno, Motoyasu
Yamamoto, Nobuyuki
Nakagawa, Kazuhiko
author_facet Kato, Ryoji
Hayashi, Hidetoshi
Chiba, Yasutaka
Miyawaki, Eriko
Shimizu, Junichi
Ozaki, Tomohiro
Fujimoto, Daichi
Toyozawa, Ryo
Nakamura, Atsushi
Kozuki, Toshiyuki
Tanaka, Kentaro
Teraoka, Shunsuke
Usui, Kazuhiro
Nishino, Kazumi
Hataji, Osamu
Ota, Keiichi
Ebi, Noriyuki
Saeki, Sho
Akazawa, Yuki
Okuno, Motoyasu
Yamamoto, Nobuyuki
Nakagawa, Kazuhiko
author_sort Kato, Ryoji
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that chemotherapy after immune checkpoint inhibitors may confer an improved response for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, potential selection bias in such studies has not been addressed. We therefore applied propensity score analysis to investigate the efficacy of chemotherapy after PD-1 inhibitor treatment (CAP) compared with chemotherapy alone. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study for patients treated at 47 institutions across Japan between April 1, 2014 and July 31, 2017. Eligible patients had advanced or recurrent NSCLC who have undergone chemotherapy. Patients subsequently treated with chemotherapy (docetaxel with or without ramucirumab, S-1 or pemetrexed) either after PD-1 inhibitor therapy (CAP cohort) or alone (control cohort) were included. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was applied to adjust for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: A total of 1439 patients (243 and 1196 in the CAP and control cohorts, respectively) was available for unadjusted analysis. Several baseline characteristics—including age, histology, EGFR or ALK genetic alterations, and brain metastasis—differed significantly between the two cohorts. After adjustment for patient characteristics with the IPW method, ORR was 18.9% for the CAP cohort and 11.0% for the control cohort (ORR ratio 1.71; 95% CI 1.19 to 2.46; p=0.004). IPW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves showed that median progression-free survival (PFS) for the CAP and control cohorts was 2.8 and 2.7 months (IPW-adjusted HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.12; p=0.55), and median overall survival (OS) was 9.2 and 10.4 months (IPW-adjusted HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.86 to 1.28; p=0.63), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: After accounting for selection bias by propensity score analysis, CAP showed a significantly higher ORR compared with chemotherapy alone, with the primary end point of ORR being achieved. However, these results did not translate into a PFS or OS advantage, suggesting that prior administration of PD-1 inhibitors may result in a synergistic antitumor effect with subsequent chemotherapy, but that such an effect is transient. CAP therefore does not appear to achieve durable tumor control or confer a lasting survival benefit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7057433
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70574332020-03-05 Propensity score–weighted analysis of chemotherapy after PD-1 inhibitors versus chemotherapy alone in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (WJOG10217L) Kato, Ryoji Hayashi, Hidetoshi Chiba, Yasutaka Miyawaki, Eriko Shimizu, Junichi Ozaki, Tomohiro Fujimoto, Daichi Toyozawa, Ryo Nakamura, Atsushi Kozuki, Toshiyuki Tanaka, Kentaro Teraoka, Shunsuke Usui, Kazuhiro Nishino, Kazumi Hataji, Osamu Ota, Keiichi Ebi, Noriyuki Saeki, Sho Akazawa, Yuki Okuno, Motoyasu Yamamoto, Nobuyuki Nakagawa, Kazuhiko J Immunother Cancer Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that chemotherapy after immune checkpoint inhibitors may confer an improved response for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, potential selection bias in such studies has not been addressed. We therefore applied propensity score analysis to investigate the efficacy of chemotherapy after PD-1 inhibitor treatment (CAP) compared with chemotherapy alone. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study for patients treated at 47 institutions across Japan between April 1, 2014 and July 31, 2017. Eligible patients had advanced or recurrent NSCLC who have undergone chemotherapy. Patients subsequently treated with chemotherapy (docetaxel with or without ramucirumab, S-1 or pemetrexed) either after PD-1 inhibitor therapy (CAP cohort) or alone (control cohort) were included. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was applied to adjust for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: A total of 1439 patients (243 and 1196 in the CAP and control cohorts, respectively) was available for unadjusted analysis. Several baseline characteristics—including age, histology, EGFR or ALK genetic alterations, and brain metastasis—differed significantly between the two cohorts. After adjustment for patient characteristics with the IPW method, ORR was 18.9% for the CAP cohort and 11.0% for the control cohort (ORR ratio 1.71; 95% CI 1.19 to 2.46; p=0.004). IPW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves showed that median progression-free survival (PFS) for the CAP and control cohorts was 2.8 and 2.7 months (IPW-adjusted HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.12; p=0.55), and median overall survival (OS) was 9.2 and 10.4 months (IPW-adjusted HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.86 to 1.28; p=0.63), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: After accounting for selection bias by propensity score analysis, CAP showed a significantly higher ORR compared with chemotherapy alone, with the primary end point of ORR being achieved. However, these results did not translate into a PFS or OS advantage, suggesting that prior administration of PD-1 inhibitors may result in a synergistic antitumor effect with subsequent chemotherapy, but that such an effect is transient. CAP therefore does not appear to achieve durable tumor control or confer a lasting survival benefit. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7057433/ /pubmed/32066647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2019-000350 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy
Kato, Ryoji
Hayashi, Hidetoshi
Chiba, Yasutaka
Miyawaki, Eriko
Shimizu, Junichi
Ozaki, Tomohiro
Fujimoto, Daichi
Toyozawa, Ryo
Nakamura, Atsushi
Kozuki, Toshiyuki
Tanaka, Kentaro
Teraoka, Shunsuke
Usui, Kazuhiro
Nishino, Kazumi
Hataji, Osamu
Ota, Keiichi
Ebi, Noriyuki
Saeki, Sho
Akazawa, Yuki
Okuno, Motoyasu
Yamamoto, Nobuyuki
Nakagawa, Kazuhiko
Propensity score–weighted analysis of chemotherapy after PD-1 inhibitors versus chemotherapy alone in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (WJOG10217L)
title Propensity score–weighted analysis of chemotherapy after PD-1 inhibitors versus chemotherapy alone in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (WJOG10217L)
title_full Propensity score–weighted analysis of chemotherapy after PD-1 inhibitors versus chemotherapy alone in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (WJOG10217L)
title_fullStr Propensity score–weighted analysis of chemotherapy after PD-1 inhibitors versus chemotherapy alone in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (WJOG10217L)
title_full_unstemmed Propensity score–weighted analysis of chemotherapy after PD-1 inhibitors versus chemotherapy alone in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (WJOG10217L)
title_short Propensity score–weighted analysis of chemotherapy after PD-1 inhibitors versus chemotherapy alone in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (WJOG10217L)
title_sort propensity score–weighted analysis of chemotherapy after pd-1 inhibitors versus chemotherapy alone in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (wjog10217l)
topic Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7057433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32066647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2019-000350
work_keys_str_mv AT katoryoji propensityscoreweightedanalysisofchemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsversuschemotherapyaloneinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerwjog10217l
AT hayashihidetoshi propensityscoreweightedanalysisofchemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsversuschemotherapyaloneinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerwjog10217l
AT chibayasutaka propensityscoreweightedanalysisofchemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsversuschemotherapyaloneinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerwjog10217l
AT miyawakieriko propensityscoreweightedanalysisofchemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsversuschemotherapyaloneinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerwjog10217l
AT shimizujunichi propensityscoreweightedanalysisofchemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsversuschemotherapyaloneinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerwjog10217l
AT ozakitomohiro propensityscoreweightedanalysisofchemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsversuschemotherapyaloneinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerwjog10217l
AT fujimotodaichi propensityscoreweightedanalysisofchemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsversuschemotherapyaloneinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerwjog10217l
AT toyozawaryo propensityscoreweightedanalysisofchemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsversuschemotherapyaloneinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerwjog10217l
AT nakamuraatsushi propensityscoreweightedanalysisofchemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsversuschemotherapyaloneinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerwjog10217l
AT kozukitoshiyuki propensityscoreweightedanalysisofchemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsversuschemotherapyaloneinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerwjog10217l
AT tanakakentaro propensityscoreweightedanalysisofchemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsversuschemotherapyaloneinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerwjog10217l
AT teraokashunsuke propensityscoreweightedanalysisofchemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsversuschemotherapyaloneinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerwjog10217l
AT usuikazuhiro propensityscoreweightedanalysisofchemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsversuschemotherapyaloneinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerwjog10217l
AT nishinokazumi propensityscoreweightedanalysisofchemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsversuschemotherapyaloneinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerwjog10217l
AT hatajiosamu propensityscoreweightedanalysisofchemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsversuschemotherapyaloneinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerwjog10217l
AT otakeiichi propensityscoreweightedanalysisofchemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsversuschemotherapyaloneinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerwjog10217l
AT ebinoriyuki propensityscoreweightedanalysisofchemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsversuschemotherapyaloneinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerwjog10217l
AT saekisho propensityscoreweightedanalysisofchemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsversuschemotherapyaloneinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerwjog10217l
AT akazawayuki propensityscoreweightedanalysisofchemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsversuschemotherapyaloneinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerwjog10217l
AT okunomotoyasu propensityscoreweightedanalysisofchemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsversuschemotherapyaloneinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerwjog10217l
AT yamamotonobuyuki propensityscoreweightedanalysisofchemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsversuschemotherapyaloneinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerwjog10217l
AT nakagawakazuhiko propensityscoreweightedanalysisofchemotherapyafterpd1inhibitorsversuschemotherapyaloneinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerwjog10217l