Cargando…
The development of a robotic gynaecological surgery training curriculum and results of a delphi study
BACKGROUND: Technology for minimal access surgery is rapidly progressing in all surgical specialities including Gynaecology. As robotic surgery becomes established in increasing numbers of hospitals, there is no set curriculum for training in robotic gynaecological surgery or the assistant role in u...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7057472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32131812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1979-y |
_version_ | 1783503667021742080 |
---|---|
author | Ismail, Aemn Wood, Matthew Ind, Thomas Gul, Nahid Moss, Esther |
author_facet | Ismail, Aemn Wood, Matthew Ind, Thomas Gul, Nahid Moss, Esther |
author_sort | Ismail, Aemn |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Technology for minimal access surgery is rapidly progressing in all surgical specialities including Gynaecology. As robotic surgery becomes established in increasing numbers of hospitals, there is no set curriculum for training in robotic gynaecological surgery or the assistant role in use in the UK. The purpose of this study was to determine a list of competencies that could be used as the basis of a core robotic gynaecological surgery curriculum, to explore its acceptability and the level of interest in undertaking training in robotics among obstetrics & gynaecology (O&G) trainees. METHODS: A four-round Delphi study was conducted using members and associates of British & Irish Association of Robotic Gynaecological Surgeons (BIARGS). In Round 1 respondents were asked to propose standards that could be used in the curriculum. In the following three rounds, the respondents were asked to score each of the standards according to their opinion as to the importance of the standard. Items that scored a mean of 80% or above were included in the final proposed curriculum. Following this, a national survey was conducted to explore the interest among O&G trainees in undertaking a formal robotic training for the first assistant and console surgeon roles. RESULTS: The items proposed were divided into three separate sections: competencies for a medical first assistant; competencies for a console surgeon; continued professional development for trained console surgeons. From the national survey; 109 responses were received of which 60% were interested in undertaking a formal training for the first assistant role, and 68% are expressing interest in training for the console surgeon role. CONCLUSION: Undertaking a Delphi exercise to determine a core gynaecological robotic training curriculum has enabled consensus to be achieved from the opinions of BIARGS members/associates. There is interest among O&G trainees at all levels of training to gain experience and develop their skills in robotic surgery by undertaking a formal training in robotic surgery at both the first assistant and console surgeon level. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7057472 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70574722020-03-10 The development of a robotic gynaecological surgery training curriculum and results of a delphi study Ismail, Aemn Wood, Matthew Ind, Thomas Gul, Nahid Moss, Esther BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Technology for minimal access surgery is rapidly progressing in all surgical specialities including Gynaecology. As robotic surgery becomes established in increasing numbers of hospitals, there is no set curriculum for training in robotic gynaecological surgery or the assistant role in use in the UK. The purpose of this study was to determine a list of competencies that could be used as the basis of a core robotic gynaecological surgery curriculum, to explore its acceptability and the level of interest in undertaking training in robotics among obstetrics & gynaecology (O&G) trainees. METHODS: A four-round Delphi study was conducted using members and associates of British & Irish Association of Robotic Gynaecological Surgeons (BIARGS). In Round 1 respondents were asked to propose standards that could be used in the curriculum. In the following three rounds, the respondents were asked to score each of the standards according to their opinion as to the importance of the standard. Items that scored a mean of 80% or above were included in the final proposed curriculum. Following this, a national survey was conducted to explore the interest among O&G trainees in undertaking a formal robotic training for the first assistant and console surgeon roles. RESULTS: The items proposed were divided into three separate sections: competencies for a medical first assistant; competencies for a console surgeon; continued professional development for trained console surgeons. From the national survey; 109 responses were received of which 60% were interested in undertaking a formal training for the first assistant role, and 68% are expressing interest in training for the console surgeon role. CONCLUSION: Undertaking a Delphi exercise to determine a core gynaecological robotic training curriculum has enabled consensus to be achieved from the opinions of BIARGS members/associates. There is interest among O&G trainees at all levels of training to gain experience and develop their skills in robotic surgery by undertaking a formal training in robotic surgery at both the first assistant and console surgeon level. BioMed Central 2020-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7057472/ /pubmed/32131812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1979-y Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ismail, Aemn Wood, Matthew Ind, Thomas Gul, Nahid Moss, Esther The development of a robotic gynaecological surgery training curriculum and results of a delphi study |
title | The development of a robotic gynaecological surgery training curriculum and results of a delphi study |
title_full | The development of a robotic gynaecological surgery training curriculum and results of a delphi study |
title_fullStr | The development of a robotic gynaecological surgery training curriculum and results of a delphi study |
title_full_unstemmed | The development of a robotic gynaecological surgery training curriculum and results of a delphi study |
title_short | The development of a robotic gynaecological surgery training curriculum and results of a delphi study |
title_sort | development of a robotic gynaecological surgery training curriculum and results of a delphi study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7057472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32131812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1979-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ismailaemn thedevelopmentofaroboticgynaecologicalsurgerytrainingcurriculumandresultsofadelphistudy AT woodmatthew thedevelopmentofaroboticgynaecologicalsurgerytrainingcurriculumandresultsofadelphistudy AT indthomas thedevelopmentofaroboticgynaecologicalsurgerytrainingcurriculumandresultsofadelphistudy AT gulnahid thedevelopmentofaroboticgynaecologicalsurgerytrainingcurriculumandresultsofadelphistudy AT mossesther thedevelopmentofaroboticgynaecologicalsurgerytrainingcurriculumandresultsofadelphistudy AT ismailaemn developmentofaroboticgynaecologicalsurgerytrainingcurriculumandresultsofadelphistudy AT woodmatthew developmentofaroboticgynaecologicalsurgerytrainingcurriculumandresultsofadelphistudy AT indthomas developmentofaroboticgynaecologicalsurgerytrainingcurriculumandresultsofadelphistudy AT gulnahid developmentofaroboticgynaecologicalsurgerytrainingcurriculumandresultsofadelphistudy AT mossesther developmentofaroboticgynaecologicalsurgerytrainingcurriculumandresultsofadelphistudy |