Cargando…

Low-cost equipment for the evaluation of reach and grasp in post-stroke individuals: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: Reach–grasp movements are motor components commonly affected after stroke and directly related to the independence of these individuals. Evaluations of these activities can be performed using clinical instruments and assessed by detailed and costly kinematic analyses. The aim of this stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gomes, Camila L. A., Cacho, Roberta O., Nobrega, Viviane T. B., de A. Confessor, Ellen Marjorie, de Farias, Eyshila Emanuelle M., Neto, José Leôncio F., de Araújo, Denise S., de S. Medeiros, Ana Loyse, Barreto, Rodrigo L., Cacho, Enio W. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7057550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32131840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-020-0758-7
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Reach–grasp movements are motor components commonly affected after stroke and directly related to the independence of these individuals. Evaluations of these activities can be performed using clinical instruments and assessed by detailed and costly kinematic analyses. The aim of this study was to develop an analysis of reach–grasp movements in post-stroke patients using a simple, inexpensive, and manageable instrument. RESULTS: A Mann–Whitney test was used to compare paretic and non-paretic limb motor performance. A statistically significant difference was found between the variables of total time (p = 0.02) and speed to reach target 3 (p = 0.04) for task 1, while in task 2 significance was found only in the aspect of speed to reach target 2 (p = 0.04). The correlation between clinical tests and variables of tasks was then performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. At task 1, when compared with the REACH instrument, the close target sub-item; there was a high positive correlation between the parameters of total time (p = 0.028), target velocity 3 (p = 0.028), and target acceleration 3 (p = 0.028). Another instrument that showed a high positive correlation with the target time 3 (p = 0.01) and target acceleration 3 (p = 0.028) variables was the Box and Block Test. When correlated, the data between the task 2 variables and clinical instruments did not present statistically significant data. CONCLUSION: Our instrument—the Temporal Data Acquisition Instrument—TDAI—fulfilled the expected objectives and can be used as an option to evaluate the movements of reach and grasp of upper limb post-stroke, using an easy and fast application, without the need for calibration. Trial registration Trial Registration: Research Ethics Committee of the Trairi School of Health Sciences—Number 2.625.609, approved on April 13, 2018; Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials—RBR-4995cr approved on July 4, 2019 retrospectively registered (http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-4995cr/)