Cargando…

ADL recovery trajectory after discharge and its predictors among baseline-independent older inpatients

BACKGROUND: Among the previous studies about the ADL recovery and its predictors, the researches and resources used to study and protect the baseline-independent older patients from being permanently ADL-dependent was few. We aimed to describe the level of activities of daily living (ADL) at dischar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xiuyue, Zheng, Tingting, Guan, Yaqi, Li, Hui, Zhu, Kexin, Shen, Lu, Yin, Zhiqin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7057590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32131744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-1481-8
_version_ 1783503693429080064
author Li, Xiuyue
Zheng, Tingting
Guan, Yaqi
Li, Hui
Zhu, Kexin
Shen, Lu
Yin, Zhiqin
author_facet Li, Xiuyue
Zheng, Tingting
Guan, Yaqi
Li, Hui
Zhu, Kexin
Shen, Lu
Yin, Zhiqin
author_sort Li, Xiuyue
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Among the previous studies about the ADL recovery and its predictors, the researches and resources used to study and protect the baseline-independent older patients from being permanently ADL-dependent was few. We aimed to describe the level of activities of daily living (ADL) at discharge and ADL change within 6 months after discharge in older patients who were ADL-independent before admission but became dependent because of acute illness, and to identify the predictors of early rehabilitation,so as to provide the basis to early intervention. METHODS: Stratified cluster sampling was used to recruit 520 hospitalised older patients who were ADL-independent from departments of internal medicine at two tertiary hospitals from August 2017 to May 2018. Demographics, clinical data, and ADL status at 1, 3, and 6 months after discharge were collected. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Student’s t-test, Pearson’s chi-square test,Spearman’s correlation analysis, binary logistic regression analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: There were 403 out of 520 patients completing the 6-month follow-up, and 229 (56.8%) regained independence at 6 months after discharge. There was an overall increasing trend in ADL with time. The recovery rate was the highest within the first month after discharge, gradually declined after 1 month, and changed less obviously from 3 to 6 months after discharge (p < 0.001). ADL score at discharge (OR = 1.034, p < 0.001), age (OR = 0.269, p = 0.001), post-discharge residence (OR = 0.390, p < 0.05), and cognition status at discharge (OR = 1.685, p < 0.05) were predictors of ADL recovery. The area under the curve of the four predictors combined was 0.763 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Studying ADL recovery rate and its predicting indicators of the baseline independent inpatients at different time points provide a theoretical reference for the formulation of nursing plans and allocation of care resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7057590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70575902020-03-10 ADL recovery trajectory after discharge and its predictors among baseline-independent older inpatients Li, Xiuyue Zheng, Tingting Guan, Yaqi Li, Hui Zhu, Kexin Shen, Lu Yin, Zhiqin BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Among the previous studies about the ADL recovery and its predictors, the researches and resources used to study and protect the baseline-independent older patients from being permanently ADL-dependent was few. We aimed to describe the level of activities of daily living (ADL) at discharge and ADL change within 6 months after discharge in older patients who were ADL-independent before admission but became dependent because of acute illness, and to identify the predictors of early rehabilitation,so as to provide the basis to early intervention. METHODS: Stratified cluster sampling was used to recruit 520 hospitalised older patients who were ADL-independent from departments of internal medicine at two tertiary hospitals from August 2017 to May 2018. Demographics, clinical data, and ADL status at 1, 3, and 6 months after discharge were collected. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Student’s t-test, Pearson’s chi-square test,Spearman’s correlation analysis, binary logistic regression analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: There were 403 out of 520 patients completing the 6-month follow-up, and 229 (56.8%) regained independence at 6 months after discharge. There was an overall increasing trend in ADL with time. The recovery rate was the highest within the first month after discharge, gradually declined after 1 month, and changed less obviously from 3 to 6 months after discharge (p < 0.001). ADL score at discharge (OR = 1.034, p < 0.001), age (OR = 0.269, p = 0.001), post-discharge residence (OR = 0.390, p < 0.05), and cognition status at discharge (OR = 1.685, p < 0.05) were predictors of ADL recovery. The area under the curve of the four predictors combined was 0.763 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Studying ADL recovery rate and its predicting indicators of the baseline independent inpatients at different time points provide a theoretical reference for the formulation of nursing plans and allocation of care resources. BioMed Central 2020-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7057590/ /pubmed/32131744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-1481-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Xiuyue
Zheng, Tingting
Guan, Yaqi
Li, Hui
Zhu, Kexin
Shen, Lu
Yin, Zhiqin
ADL recovery trajectory after discharge and its predictors among baseline-independent older inpatients
title ADL recovery trajectory after discharge and its predictors among baseline-independent older inpatients
title_full ADL recovery trajectory after discharge and its predictors among baseline-independent older inpatients
title_fullStr ADL recovery trajectory after discharge and its predictors among baseline-independent older inpatients
title_full_unstemmed ADL recovery trajectory after discharge and its predictors among baseline-independent older inpatients
title_short ADL recovery trajectory after discharge and its predictors among baseline-independent older inpatients
title_sort adl recovery trajectory after discharge and its predictors among baseline-independent older inpatients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7057590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32131744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-1481-8
work_keys_str_mv AT lixiuyue adlrecoverytrajectoryafterdischargeanditspredictorsamongbaselineindependentolderinpatients
AT zhengtingting adlrecoverytrajectoryafterdischargeanditspredictorsamongbaselineindependentolderinpatients
AT guanyaqi adlrecoverytrajectoryafterdischargeanditspredictorsamongbaselineindependentolderinpatients
AT lihui adlrecoverytrajectoryafterdischargeanditspredictorsamongbaselineindependentolderinpatients
AT zhukexin adlrecoverytrajectoryafterdischargeanditspredictorsamongbaselineindependentolderinpatients
AT shenlu adlrecoverytrajectoryafterdischargeanditspredictorsamongbaselineindependentolderinpatients
AT yinzhiqin adlrecoverytrajectoryafterdischargeanditspredictorsamongbaselineindependentolderinpatients