Cargando…

Assessment of carotid atherosclerotic disease using three-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging: comparison with digital subtraction angiography

BACKGROUND: A three-dimensional (3D) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) vessel wall imaging (VWI) technique based on 3D T1 weighted (T1w) Sampling Perfection with Application-optimized Contrast using different flip angle Evolutions (SPACE) has recently been used as a promising CMR imaging modal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Zhenjia, Lu, Mi, Liu, Wen, Zheng, Tiejin, Li, Debiao, Yu, Wei, Fan, Zhaoyang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7057661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32131854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-0604-x
_version_ 1783503709856071680
author Wang, Zhenjia
Lu, Mi
Liu, Wen
Zheng, Tiejin
Li, Debiao
Yu, Wei
Fan, Zhaoyang
author_facet Wang, Zhenjia
Lu, Mi
Liu, Wen
Zheng, Tiejin
Li, Debiao
Yu, Wei
Fan, Zhaoyang
author_sort Wang, Zhenjia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A three-dimensional (3D) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) vessel wall imaging (VWI) technique based on 3D T1 weighted (T1w) Sampling Perfection with Application-optimized Contrast using different flip angle Evolutions (SPACE) has recently been used as a promising CMR imaging modality for evaluating extra-cranial and intra-cranial vessel walls. However, this technique is yet to be validated against the current diagnostic imaging standard. We therefore aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 3D CMR VWI in characterizing carotid disease using intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as a reference. METHODS: Consecutive patients with at least unilateral > 50% carotid stenosis on ultrasound were scheduled to undergo interventional therapy were invited to participate. The following metrics were measured using 3D CMR VWI and DSA: lumen diameter of the common carotid artery (CCA) and segments C1–C7, stenosis diameter, reference diameter, lesion length, stenosis degree, and ulceration. We assessed the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 3D CMR VWI, and used Cohen’s kappa, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman analyses to assess the diagnostic agreement between 3D CMR VWI and DSA. RESULTS: The ICC (all ICCs ≥0.96) and Bland-Altman plots indicated excellent inter-reader agreement in all individual morphologic measurements by 3D CMR VWI. Excellent agreement in all individual morphologic measurements were also found between 3D CMR VWI and DSA. In addition, 3D CMR VWI had high sensitivity (98.4, 97.4, 80.0, 100.0%), specificity (100.0, 94.5, 99.1, 98.0%), and Cohen’s kappa (0.99, 0.89, 0.84, 0.96) for detecting stenosis > 50%, stenosis > 70%, ulceration, and total occlusion, respectively, using DSA as the standard. The AUC of 3D CMR VWI for predicting stenosis > 50 and > 70% were 0.998 and 0.999, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D CMR VWI technique enables accurate diagnosis and luminal feature assessment of carotid artery atherosclerosis, suggesting that this imaging modality may be useful for routine imaging workups and provide comprehensive information for both the vessel wall and lumen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7057661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70576612020-03-10 Assessment of carotid atherosclerotic disease using three-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging: comparison with digital subtraction angiography Wang, Zhenjia Lu, Mi Liu, Wen Zheng, Tiejin Li, Debiao Yu, Wei Fan, Zhaoyang J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: A three-dimensional (3D) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) vessel wall imaging (VWI) technique based on 3D T1 weighted (T1w) Sampling Perfection with Application-optimized Contrast using different flip angle Evolutions (SPACE) has recently been used as a promising CMR imaging modality for evaluating extra-cranial and intra-cranial vessel walls. However, this technique is yet to be validated against the current diagnostic imaging standard. We therefore aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 3D CMR VWI in characterizing carotid disease using intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as a reference. METHODS: Consecutive patients with at least unilateral > 50% carotid stenosis on ultrasound were scheduled to undergo interventional therapy were invited to participate. The following metrics were measured using 3D CMR VWI and DSA: lumen diameter of the common carotid artery (CCA) and segments C1–C7, stenosis diameter, reference diameter, lesion length, stenosis degree, and ulceration. We assessed the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 3D CMR VWI, and used Cohen’s kappa, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman analyses to assess the diagnostic agreement between 3D CMR VWI and DSA. RESULTS: The ICC (all ICCs ≥0.96) and Bland-Altman plots indicated excellent inter-reader agreement in all individual morphologic measurements by 3D CMR VWI. Excellent agreement in all individual morphologic measurements were also found between 3D CMR VWI and DSA. In addition, 3D CMR VWI had high sensitivity (98.4, 97.4, 80.0, 100.0%), specificity (100.0, 94.5, 99.1, 98.0%), and Cohen’s kappa (0.99, 0.89, 0.84, 0.96) for detecting stenosis > 50%, stenosis > 70%, ulceration, and total occlusion, respectively, using DSA as the standard. The AUC of 3D CMR VWI for predicting stenosis > 50 and > 70% were 0.998 and 0.999, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D CMR VWI technique enables accurate diagnosis and luminal feature assessment of carotid artery atherosclerosis, suggesting that this imaging modality may be useful for routine imaging workups and provide comprehensive information for both the vessel wall and lumen. BioMed Central 2020-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7057661/ /pubmed/32131854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-0604-x Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Wang, Zhenjia
Lu, Mi
Liu, Wen
Zheng, Tiejin
Li, Debiao
Yu, Wei
Fan, Zhaoyang
Assessment of carotid atherosclerotic disease using three-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging: comparison with digital subtraction angiography
title Assessment of carotid atherosclerotic disease using three-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging: comparison with digital subtraction angiography
title_full Assessment of carotid atherosclerotic disease using three-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging: comparison with digital subtraction angiography
title_fullStr Assessment of carotid atherosclerotic disease using three-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging: comparison with digital subtraction angiography
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of carotid atherosclerotic disease using three-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging: comparison with digital subtraction angiography
title_short Assessment of carotid atherosclerotic disease using three-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging: comparison with digital subtraction angiography
title_sort assessment of carotid atherosclerotic disease using three-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging: comparison with digital subtraction angiography
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7057661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32131854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-0604-x
work_keys_str_mv AT wangzhenjia assessmentofcarotidatheroscleroticdiseaseusingthreedimensionalcardiovascularmagneticresonancevesselwallimagingcomparisonwithdigitalsubtractionangiography
AT lumi assessmentofcarotidatheroscleroticdiseaseusingthreedimensionalcardiovascularmagneticresonancevesselwallimagingcomparisonwithdigitalsubtractionangiography
AT liuwen assessmentofcarotidatheroscleroticdiseaseusingthreedimensionalcardiovascularmagneticresonancevesselwallimagingcomparisonwithdigitalsubtractionangiography
AT zhengtiejin assessmentofcarotidatheroscleroticdiseaseusingthreedimensionalcardiovascularmagneticresonancevesselwallimagingcomparisonwithdigitalsubtractionangiography
AT lidebiao assessmentofcarotidatheroscleroticdiseaseusingthreedimensionalcardiovascularmagneticresonancevesselwallimagingcomparisonwithdigitalsubtractionangiography
AT yuwei assessmentofcarotidatheroscleroticdiseaseusingthreedimensionalcardiovascularmagneticresonancevesselwallimagingcomparisonwithdigitalsubtractionangiography
AT fanzhaoyang assessmentofcarotidatheroscleroticdiseaseusingthreedimensionalcardiovascularmagneticresonancevesselwallimagingcomparisonwithdigitalsubtractionangiography