Cargando…

The Prognostic Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and KRAS Mutation in Colorectal Cancers

OBJECTIVE: Prognostic effect of KRAS mutation and side of tumor in colorectal cancer is a highly controversial subject. Therefore, we evaluated the association between FDG uptake pattern in (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) imaging and K...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arslan, Esra, Aksoy, Tamer, Gürsu, Rıza Umar, Dursun, Nevra, Çakar, Ekrem, Çermik, Tevfik Fikret
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7057728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32079384
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/mirt.galenos.2019.33866
_version_ 1783503724540329984
author Arslan, Esra
Aksoy, Tamer
Gürsu, Rıza Umar
Dursun, Nevra
Çakar, Ekrem
Çermik, Tevfik Fikret
author_facet Arslan, Esra
Aksoy, Tamer
Gürsu, Rıza Umar
Dursun, Nevra
Çakar, Ekrem
Çermik, Tevfik Fikret
author_sort Arslan, Esra
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Prognostic effect of KRAS mutation and side of tumor in colorectal cancer is a highly controversial subject. Therefore, we evaluated the association between FDG uptake pattern in (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) imaging and KRAS mutation and tumor localization in patients with a diagnosis of colon cancer and assessed the effects of these three factors on prognosis and survival. METHODS: Eighty-three patients with colorectal cancer were retrospectively included in this study. (18)F-FDG PET/CT study was performed for pretreatment staging. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) of the primary tumor and survival data of patients were compared between groups. KRAS mutations were detected with the help of real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction technique through genomic DNA extracted from paraffin-embedded tumor tissue blocks. Tumor lesions with potential KRAS mutations were classified as mutant KRAS and wild type. RESULTS: Twenty five patients were female while 58 were male. The mean age of the patients was 59.8±11.3 years. Mean follow-up was 35.5±18.9 months. Primary tumor was localized in the left colon in 83.1% of patients and in the right colon in 16.9%. KRAS mutation was detected in 54.2% (n=45) of patients. Mean SUV(max) of patients with primary tumor was estimated to be 21.1±9.1 (range= 6.0-47.5). Mean tumor SUV(max) of patients with a KRAS mutation (24.0±9.0) was found to be significantly higher than those without KRAS mutation (17.7±8.2) (p=0.001). Mean survival was significantly shorter in patients with locoregional nodal metastasis than in patients without locoregional nodal metastasis as well as in patients with distant nodal metastasis than in patients without distant nodal metastasis and in patients with organ metastasis in initial PET/CT than in patients without organ metastasis. Also, mean survival was nearly statistically-significantly shorter in patients with tumors located in left colon (34.2±19.4) than in right colon (43.2±14.6) (p=0.059). However, we found no significant impact of KRAS mutation on survival. CONCLUSION: In our study, we found that tumor localization had no significant effect on prognosis in patients with colon cancer. On the other hand, FDG uptake was observed to be higher in the presence of KRAS mutation and it was concluded that coexistence of KRAS mutation with higher SUV(max) is a negative prognostic factor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7057728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70577282020-03-16 The Prognostic Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and KRAS Mutation in Colorectal Cancers Arslan, Esra Aksoy, Tamer Gürsu, Rıza Umar Dursun, Nevra Çakar, Ekrem Çermik, Tevfik Fikret Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Prognostic effect of KRAS mutation and side of tumor in colorectal cancer is a highly controversial subject. Therefore, we evaluated the association between FDG uptake pattern in (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) imaging and KRAS mutation and tumor localization in patients with a diagnosis of colon cancer and assessed the effects of these three factors on prognosis and survival. METHODS: Eighty-three patients with colorectal cancer were retrospectively included in this study. (18)F-FDG PET/CT study was performed for pretreatment staging. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) of the primary tumor and survival data of patients were compared between groups. KRAS mutations were detected with the help of real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction technique through genomic DNA extracted from paraffin-embedded tumor tissue blocks. Tumor lesions with potential KRAS mutations were classified as mutant KRAS and wild type. RESULTS: Twenty five patients were female while 58 were male. The mean age of the patients was 59.8±11.3 years. Mean follow-up was 35.5±18.9 months. Primary tumor was localized in the left colon in 83.1% of patients and in the right colon in 16.9%. KRAS mutation was detected in 54.2% (n=45) of patients. Mean SUV(max) of patients with primary tumor was estimated to be 21.1±9.1 (range= 6.0-47.5). Mean tumor SUV(max) of patients with a KRAS mutation (24.0±9.0) was found to be significantly higher than those without KRAS mutation (17.7±8.2) (p=0.001). Mean survival was significantly shorter in patients with locoregional nodal metastasis than in patients without locoregional nodal metastasis as well as in patients with distant nodal metastasis than in patients without distant nodal metastasis and in patients with organ metastasis in initial PET/CT than in patients without organ metastasis. Also, mean survival was nearly statistically-significantly shorter in patients with tumors located in left colon (34.2±19.4) than in right colon (43.2±14.6) (p=0.059). However, we found no significant impact of KRAS mutation on survival. CONCLUSION: In our study, we found that tumor localization had no significant effect on prognosis in patients with colon cancer. On the other hand, FDG uptake was observed to be higher in the presence of KRAS mutation and it was concluded that coexistence of KRAS mutation with higher SUV(max) is a negative prognostic factor. Galenos Publishing 2020-02 2020-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7057728/ /pubmed/32079384 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/mirt.galenos.2019.33866 Text en ©Copyright 2020 by Turkish Society of Nuclear Medicine | Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy published by Galenos Yayınevi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Arslan, Esra
Aksoy, Tamer
Gürsu, Rıza Umar
Dursun, Nevra
Çakar, Ekrem
Çermik, Tevfik Fikret
The Prognostic Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and KRAS Mutation in Colorectal Cancers
title The Prognostic Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and KRAS Mutation in Colorectal Cancers
title_full The Prognostic Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and KRAS Mutation in Colorectal Cancers
title_fullStr The Prognostic Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and KRAS Mutation in Colorectal Cancers
title_full_unstemmed The Prognostic Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and KRAS Mutation in Colorectal Cancers
title_short The Prognostic Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and KRAS Mutation in Colorectal Cancers
title_sort prognostic value of (18)f-fdg pet/ct and kras mutation in colorectal cancers
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7057728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32079384
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/mirt.galenos.2019.33866
work_keys_str_mv AT arslanesra theprognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctandkrasmutationincolorectalcancers
AT aksoytamer theprognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctandkrasmutationincolorectalcancers
AT gursurızaumar theprognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctandkrasmutationincolorectalcancers
AT dursunnevra theprognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctandkrasmutationincolorectalcancers
AT cakarekrem theprognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctandkrasmutationincolorectalcancers
AT cermiktevfikfikret theprognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctandkrasmutationincolorectalcancers
AT arslanesra prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctandkrasmutationincolorectalcancers
AT aksoytamer prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctandkrasmutationincolorectalcancers
AT gursurızaumar prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctandkrasmutationincolorectalcancers
AT dursunnevra prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctandkrasmutationincolorectalcancers
AT cakarekrem prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctandkrasmutationincolorectalcancers
AT cermiktevfikfikret prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctandkrasmutationincolorectalcancers