Cargando…
The Prognostic Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and KRAS Mutation in Colorectal Cancers
OBJECTIVE: Prognostic effect of KRAS mutation and side of tumor in colorectal cancer is a highly controversial subject. Therefore, we evaluated the association between FDG uptake pattern in (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) imaging and K...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Galenos Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7057728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32079384 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/mirt.galenos.2019.33866 |
_version_ | 1783503724540329984 |
---|---|
author | Arslan, Esra Aksoy, Tamer Gürsu, Rıza Umar Dursun, Nevra Çakar, Ekrem Çermik, Tevfik Fikret |
author_facet | Arslan, Esra Aksoy, Tamer Gürsu, Rıza Umar Dursun, Nevra Çakar, Ekrem Çermik, Tevfik Fikret |
author_sort | Arslan, Esra |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Prognostic effect of KRAS mutation and side of tumor in colorectal cancer is a highly controversial subject. Therefore, we evaluated the association between FDG uptake pattern in (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) imaging and KRAS mutation and tumor localization in patients with a diagnosis of colon cancer and assessed the effects of these three factors on prognosis and survival. METHODS: Eighty-three patients with colorectal cancer were retrospectively included in this study. (18)F-FDG PET/CT study was performed for pretreatment staging. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) of the primary tumor and survival data of patients were compared between groups. KRAS mutations were detected with the help of real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction technique through genomic DNA extracted from paraffin-embedded tumor tissue blocks. Tumor lesions with potential KRAS mutations were classified as mutant KRAS and wild type. RESULTS: Twenty five patients were female while 58 were male. The mean age of the patients was 59.8±11.3 years. Mean follow-up was 35.5±18.9 months. Primary tumor was localized in the left colon in 83.1% of patients and in the right colon in 16.9%. KRAS mutation was detected in 54.2% (n=45) of patients. Mean SUV(max) of patients with primary tumor was estimated to be 21.1±9.1 (range= 6.0-47.5). Mean tumor SUV(max) of patients with a KRAS mutation (24.0±9.0) was found to be significantly higher than those without KRAS mutation (17.7±8.2) (p=0.001). Mean survival was significantly shorter in patients with locoregional nodal metastasis than in patients without locoregional nodal metastasis as well as in patients with distant nodal metastasis than in patients without distant nodal metastasis and in patients with organ metastasis in initial PET/CT than in patients without organ metastasis. Also, mean survival was nearly statistically-significantly shorter in patients with tumors located in left colon (34.2±19.4) than in right colon (43.2±14.6) (p=0.059). However, we found no significant impact of KRAS mutation on survival. CONCLUSION: In our study, we found that tumor localization had no significant effect on prognosis in patients with colon cancer. On the other hand, FDG uptake was observed to be higher in the presence of KRAS mutation and it was concluded that coexistence of KRAS mutation with higher SUV(max) is a negative prognostic factor. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7057728 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Galenos Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70577282020-03-16 The Prognostic Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and KRAS Mutation in Colorectal Cancers Arslan, Esra Aksoy, Tamer Gürsu, Rıza Umar Dursun, Nevra Çakar, Ekrem Çermik, Tevfik Fikret Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Prognostic effect of KRAS mutation and side of tumor in colorectal cancer is a highly controversial subject. Therefore, we evaluated the association between FDG uptake pattern in (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) imaging and KRAS mutation and tumor localization in patients with a diagnosis of colon cancer and assessed the effects of these three factors on prognosis and survival. METHODS: Eighty-three patients with colorectal cancer were retrospectively included in this study. (18)F-FDG PET/CT study was performed for pretreatment staging. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) of the primary tumor and survival data of patients were compared between groups. KRAS mutations were detected with the help of real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction technique through genomic DNA extracted from paraffin-embedded tumor tissue blocks. Tumor lesions with potential KRAS mutations were classified as mutant KRAS and wild type. RESULTS: Twenty five patients were female while 58 were male. The mean age of the patients was 59.8±11.3 years. Mean follow-up was 35.5±18.9 months. Primary tumor was localized in the left colon in 83.1% of patients and in the right colon in 16.9%. KRAS mutation was detected in 54.2% (n=45) of patients. Mean SUV(max) of patients with primary tumor was estimated to be 21.1±9.1 (range= 6.0-47.5). Mean tumor SUV(max) of patients with a KRAS mutation (24.0±9.0) was found to be significantly higher than those without KRAS mutation (17.7±8.2) (p=0.001). Mean survival was significantly shorter in patients with locoregional nodal metastasis than in patients without locoregional nodal metastasis as well as in patients with distant nodal metastasis than in patients without distant nodal metastasis and in patients with organ metastasis in initial PET/CT than in patients without organ metastasis. Also, mean survival was nearly statistically-significantly shorter in patients with tumors located in left colon (34.2±19.4) than in right colon (43.2±14.6) (p=0.059). However, we found no significant impact of KRAS mutation on survival. CONCLUSION: In our study, we found that tumor localization had no significant effect on prognosis in patients with colon cancer. On the other hand, FDG uptake was observed to be higher in the presence of KRAS mutation and it was concluded that coexistence of KRAS mutation with higher SUV(max) is a negative prognostic factor. Galenos Publishing 2020-02 2020-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7057728/ /pubmed/32079384 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/mirt.galenos.2019.33866 Text en ©Copyright 2020 by Turkish Society of Nuclear Medicine | Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy published by Galenos Yayınevi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Arslan, Esra Aksoy, Tamer Gürsu, Rıza Umar Dursun, Nevra Çakar, Ekrem Çermik, Tevfik Fikret The Prognostic Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and KRAS Mutation in Colorectal Cancers |
title | The Prognostic Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and KRAS Mutation in Colorectal Cancers |
title_full | The Prognostic Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and KRAS Mutation in Colorectal Cancers |
title_fullStr | The Prognostic Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and KRAS Mutation in Colorectal Cancers |
title_full_unstemmed | The Prognostic Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and KRAS Mutation in Colorectal Cancers |
title_short | The Prognostic Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and KRAS Mutation in Colorectal Cancers |
title_sort | prognostic value of (18)f-fdg pet/ct and kras mutation in colorectal cancers |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7057728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32079384 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/mirt.galenos.2019.33866 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arslanesra theprognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctandkrasmutationincolorectalcancers AT aksoytamer theprognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctandkrasmutationincolorectalcancers AT gursurızaumar theprognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctandkrasmutationincolorectalcancers AT dursunnevra theprognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctandkrasmutationincolorectalcancers AT cakarekrem theprognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctandkrasmutationincolorectalcancers AT cermiktevfikfikret theprognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctandkrasmutationincolorectalcancers AT arslanesra prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctandkrasmutationincolorectalcancers AT aksoytamer prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctandkrasmutationincolorectalcancers AT gursurızaumar prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctandkrasmutationincolorectalcancers AT dursunnevra prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctandkrasmutationincolorectalcancers AT cakarekrem prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctandkrasmutationincolorectalcancers AT cermiktevfikfikret prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctandkrasmutationincolorectalcancers |